Ridiculous Foursome incest

[loquere]

A guy comes home from college unexpectedly one weekend, thinking his family is on vacation, believing he'll have the house for a party. Instead he catches his three triplet sisters fucking each other. He plans to blackmail them into sex but finds them to be willing participants.

-He quickly finds himself receiving three-way head while while watching his favourite team in the championship game, while smoking a cigar.

 

[Sean Renaud]

I swear you have the most bizzare ideas.

You might be able to handle that as a story. I find that group sex works much better in porn than in erotica (or however you chose to define the difference between video and the written word). It gets real easy to forget who's on first when there are three hers, shes floating around and I imagine that would just get worse with three identical girls so you can't even use the hair colors or other identifiers to try to let the reader keep track. (Though if you have an artist this could easily be pure gold.)

 

[sr71plt]

And where does it go from there? It isn't a story yet, just a set up. And a tired one, but it would still have a big audience in Incest/Taboo, even as is. They don't need much intellectual stimulation in that category.

 

[loquere]

And where does it go from there? It isn't a story yet, just a set up. And a tired one, but it would still have a big audience in Incest/Taboo, even as is. They don't need much intellectual stimulation in that category.

-Mass suicide perfect ending.

 

[emap]

Dangit Sean whatever you have been drinking stop you are wrong again. I don't know about what but you are wrong so there.

Writing a foursome is a nightmare, doing one doesn't seem better, I mean hell watch porn sometime. About the closest thing to nice I have seen or heard about in foursomes where they are not doing a gangbang is a daisy chain with one gal being fucked by the guy.

Incest readers i'm pretty sure don't want to think anyway. I'm pretty sure just doing a gangbang of dad, brothers, and cousins on one gal would be viewed as the epitamy of the section.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Personally I'm all about more dicks than chicks in porn. Most of the time when you have more than one girl one of them is sitting around clearly without a clue what the fuck she should be doing with herself and too dumb to just get off camera and wait her turn.

Doesn't change the fact that it's a lot easier with actual people than to write it. Actually I think we're mostly in agreement other than I didn't completely shoot the idea down.

 

[emap]

We are talking about porn here, the gal not really doing anything but is nominally in on the sex is waiting for the director to figure out what she should do. She stays in the shot because the cameraman doesn't take her out at the behest of the director since porn is watched by men. I am quite sure men would forget she was there thirty seconds after she gets off screen.

Course porn in and of itself sucks for having more than two people involved in the sex. Simple reason, they have to show the dick in the pussy or the tongue licking the pussy or the men who are watching would not know what the hell they are doing.

Threesomes can be great fun, either with two men or two women. Foursomes with three women, or three men you run in to problems with unless everybody wants everybody. Course at that point you have a four person orgy not a foursome. This is all a matter of logistics, there are only so many ways for three women to please a man, or three men to please a woman. Generally you have one person left out simply because they don't really fit in the positions.

Granted there are ways for a woman to handle, so to speak, three men, but what do three women do to one guy?

Oh and Sean you are still wrong so there.

 

[lovecraft68]

Dangit Sean whatever you have been drinking stop you are wrong again. I don't know about what but you are wrong so there.

Writing a foursome is a nightmare, doing one doesn't seem better, I mean hell watch porn sometime. About the closest thing to nice I have seen or heard about in foursomes where they are not doing a gangbang is a daisy chain with one gal being fucked by the guy.

Incest readers i'm pretty sure don't want to think anyway. I'm pretty sure just doing a gangbang of dad, brothers, and cousins on one gal would be viewed as the epitamy of the section.

In general I agree there is such a thing as too much even in porn. If its 3/4 guys on one girl half the time at least one guy is standing around with his cock in his hand. I also find them a turn off because the average video has the girl just taking it in every hole and maybe if she is lucky one guy grabs her tit for two seconds.

This is about the most erotic gang bang vid I have seen 4 guys one girl, but they enjoy her as much as they give it to her. There is no part of this that this woman does not have at least two pair of hands wandering all over her and heaven forbid they even go down on her.

http://www.redtube.com/179533

As for real life? Having been involved in a couple of these back in the day, more than a couple of guys is awkward. Even women who are into multiple partners in r/l are not up for DP and one in the mouth.

A lot of times a couple of guys are standing around with their cocks in their hands waiting. Unlike porn they do not just step up and jam their cock somewhere their is etiquette and manners involved in real group sex/orgy/swinging situations.

My personal preference is the train. Each guy gets to fully enjoy the woman and she can enjoy each of them as well.

 

[lovecraft68]

Separate point. It continues to amaze me how people seem to think incest readers are less intelligent than readers of any other kink here.

I think making that statement simply proves the ignorance of the one stating it. Incest has a "bad rap" so to speak therefore the readers must be stupid.

I've interacted with a lot of readers in my time here through e-mail and I can tell you, most of them(not all of course) are normal and pretty intelligent people some who I've really become friendly with have quite the professional careers going, they just happen to like this kink.

Orgy incest is no more "brain dead" then any group sex story where the 18 year old virgin looses her cherry to the football team and suddenly knows how to fuck like a porn star.

The sickening GM trope that every super macho straight guy really, really, really wants to suck cock.

Every guy wants to watch his wife fuck 4 of his friends.

Every husband wants to be tied to a chair and demeaned while a black guy fucks his wife.

Every white woman drops to her knees and drool for a black cock.

Every woman really,really,really wants to get raped.

This entire site is full of "stupid" when you look at it that way.

I just look at it as different fantasies, none really better or worse than the next because most people who read them won't do them, they just like whatever kink they are reading for the vicarious thrill.

End of the day I have come to the conclusion that the incest bashers are simply pissed off that such a "stupid" category gets five times the views and votes and comments than all of other authors oh so intellectual writing in other categories.

Must hurt being so much smarter than everyone else.

Oh, wait, not smarter, I meant to say petty.

 

[loquere]

Personally I'm all about more dicks than chicks in porn. Most of the time when you have more than one girl one of them is sitting around clearly without a clue what the fuck she should be doing with herself and too dumb to just get off camera and wait her turn.

Doesn't change the fact that it's a lot easier with actual people than to write it. Actually I think we're mostly in agreement other than I didn't completely shoot the idea down.

I rather more pussy than dick.

 

[lovecraft68]

And where does it go from there? It isn't a story yet, just a set up. And a tired one, but it would still have a big audience in Incest/Taboo, even as is. They don't need much intellectual stimulation in that category.

Ever think that its statements like this, not feuds with other authors that gets you trolled?

 

[loquere]

Dangit Sean whatever you have been drinking stop you are wrong again. I don't know about what but you are wrong so there.

Writing a foursome is a nightmare, doing one doesn't seem better, I mean hell watch porn sometime. About the closest thing to nice I have seen or heard about in foursomes where they are not doing a gangbang is a daisy chain with one gal being fucked by the guy.

Incest readers i'm pretty sure don't want to think anyway. I'm pretty sure just doing a gangbang of dad, brothers, and cousins on one gal would be viewed as the epitamy of the section.

Nah I think it's hot, it's doable just a little hard. Just constantly use certain markers and each of there names all the time.

 

[lovecraft68]

What's difficult is do you keep going with "he did this, she did that," and hope the reader knows which he/she it is or do you just keep using the names, which can get repetitive and annoying?

I did a fff threesome one time and the thing drove me crazy.

She...which she?

Her...which her?

Who's fingers? Who's tongue? wait which one was under who?

I was visualizing as I wrote it and started having a hard time. Thing gave me a fucking headache.

 

[loquere]

Oh, and the girls were clearly fuking each other before the brother joined. So they know how to fuck reach other independant of the brothers direction.

 

[loquere]

I see the brother then getting a BJ from the first girl. While the two other sisters strap on fuck the first one, vaginaly and anally. Oh yeah and nipple clamps.

 

[Sean Renaud]

It is doable. Don't ever think that I'm saying something is impossible. Just really difficult and oft times not worth the effort that goes into it. (The latter being personal opinion.) Action is one of those things that works so much better with visuals and it doesn't matter if it's sex or fighting. Four people flailing around just gets unwieldy (at least for me both reading and writing) pretty quickly but I never lost track of say Neo in the fight of one thousands Smiths.

I won't debate most of the things that were said about threesomes one way or the other. I mostly agree with everything that was said including that I should place at least some of the blame on stupid camera men not knowing how to frame a shot (which is admitedly harder than it sounds and most of these people have little in the way of formal training but that ultimately does not get them forgiveness) but it still ends up with guys with cock in hand or girls who are watching and trying to remmeber not to look bored if the camera gets to their face.

I rarely talk down about any particular group of writers or readers. When I do it's usually with reason and the only group I consistently talk down about would be the Loving Wives readers and that's more because they seem unable to decide if the category is supposed to be romance of cuckold and insist upon flaming no matter which we deliver. (Granted I blame the site owners for not simply eliminating Loving Wives, replacing it with Cuckold and letting stories about actual Loving Wives fall into the Romance Category. See I can hate on more than one group at a time) regardless they are just fine by me.

 

[Carnevil9]

I almost wrote this story. But in mine, the sisters are twins, not triplets, and the brother is being schooled by them in the ways of sex. I didn't find it too difficult to keep the pronouns in check. The story and its sequel seem to be very popular.

I do have plans for a third chapter where their mother joins in. That will give me an opportunity to see if the MFFF situation is much harder than the MFF. But I don't think it will be.

 

[RicoLouis]

Are the triplet’s identical triplets or fraternal triplets because the second one would allow you to make them look alike but have some key differences such as hair color. Also girls often times change their hair color, maybe that want people to tell them apart more easily. I think twins are easier to write then triplets, but having triplets in a foursome makes it easier to couple up during sex then a threesome which can more easily lead to the odd man out like Sean was saying.

 

[loquere]

Are the triplet’s identical triplets or fraternal triplets because the second one would allow you to make them look alike but have some key differences such as hair color. Also girls often times change their hair color, maybe that want people to tell them apart more easily. I think twins are easier to write then triplets, but having triplets in a foursome makes it easier to couple up during sex then a threesome which can more easily lead to the odd man out like Sean was saying.

The whole point is them being identical, I want them to look the same.

Make a it a train. The brother fucks one triplet from behind, that triplet has a strap-on fucking the next one and she has a strap-on fucking the last one. Everyone getting what they need.