Repoh Kids at RW College call fro BURING OF MOSQUES

[Busybody]

Tee Hee

I agree

BURN EM ALL!


Wanna see the VID or do you think I made it up

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I think you are changing the facts in order to yell about hypocrisy, but the left knows no hypocrisy for they have no standard...

 

[subdued_passion]

Who/What are Repoh Kids?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Republican kids, but in this case it is more of a dog whistle for Islamic students demanding that churches be burned to the ground.


His tactics rarely change.

 

[subdued_passion]

Republican kids, but in this case it is more of a dog whistle for Islamic students demanding that churches be burned to the ground.


His tactics rarely change.

I don't understand this code that the rest of you all seem pretty fluent with. May be a cultural thing.







In other news, Islamic students killed by Jihadists in Nigeria. I'm waiting to hear PeePee's version of the events as well his take on it.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I don't understand this code that the rest of you all seem pretty fluent with. May be a cultural thing.


In other news, Islamic students killed by Jihadists in Nigeria. I'm waiting to hear PeePee's version of the events as well his take on it.

They are all better off dead. Let them kill each other off. You knew the answer...

What is so hard to understand?

Students at an Islamic University are calling for the burning of Churches; the subtext is that we are too politically correct to put this into our headlines whereas we would make it the number one story of hate if Republican kids at a University called for the burning of mosques.

 

[Busybody]

Yes, Im obvious

There was a PRO LIFE rally at a college, the TOLLY RANTERS, the CIVILITY people said that ALL CHURCHES should be burned!

Will they be suspended? Letters of reprimand in the record? Sensitivity training? HELL NO!

Can you imagine if the RALLY woulda been against GAYS or MUSLIMS?

 

[Busybody]

Republican kids, but in this case it is more of a dog whistle for Islamic students demanding that churches be burned to the ground.


His tactics rarely change.

actually it wasn't Islamic kids who called for CHURCH BURNING

WHITE MIDDLE UPPER CLASS KID

 

[Busybody]

In other news, Islamic students killed by Jihadists in Nigeria. I'm waiting to hear PeePee's version of the events as well his take on it.

good

 

[subdued_passion]

They are all better off dead. Let them kill each other off. You knew the answer...

What is so hard to understand?

Students at an Islamic University are calling for the burning of Churches; the subtext is that we are too politically correct to put this into our headlines whereas we would make it the number one story of hate if Republican kids at a University called for the burning of mosques.

I don't get why one headline is more upsetting than the other. My constitution allows for religious freedom, so all are free to practice their faith and the call to burn any religious institution would be seen as an attack on our constitutional rights.

Are you implying that people are so concerned with appearing sensitive towards minorities that they would allow them to get away with behaviour that was in violation of your laws and rights?

I find that a stretch (or maybe I'm again failing to grasp the nuances).

 

[subdued_passion]

Yes, Im obvious

There was a PRO LIFE rally at a college, the TOLLY RANTERS, the CIVILITY people said that ALL CHURCHES should be burned!

Will they be suspended? Letters of reprimand in the record? Sensitivity training? HELL NO!

Can you imagine if the RALLY woulda been against GAYS or MUSLIMS?

And no one was arrested? Shouldn't that be considered as hate speech?

 

[Busybody]

I don't get why one headline is more upsetting than the other. My constitution allows for religious freedom, so all are free to practice their faith and the call to burn any religious institution would be seen as an attack on our constitutional rights.

Are you implying that people are so concerned with appearing sensitive towards minorities that they would allow them to get away with behaviour that was in violation of your laws and rights?

I find that a stretch (or maybe I'm again failing to grasp the nuances).

yes

that YOU don't see that

is YOUR issue

LOON!

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I don't get why one headline is more upsetting than the other. My constitution allows for religious freedom, so all are free to practice their faith and the call to burn any religious institution would be seen as an attack on our constitutional rights.

Are you implying that people are so concerned with appearing sensitive towards minorities that they would allow them to get away with behaviour that was in violation of your laws and rights?

I find that a stretch (or maybe I'm again failing to grasp the nuances).

Sharia says that the constitutions of Kaffirs mean nothing.

Am I saying it? I do not have to; we can easily provide you with fresh example each day, as busybody is doing with this thread. The only thing I erred on was which precious minority was being protected from the consequences of their hate speech this time.

 

[subdued_passion]

good

Predictable.

 

[Busybody]

And no one was arrested? Shouldn't that be considered as hate speech?

STOP BEING NAIVE

 

[Busybody]

Predictable.

there is NO ONE that ISNT delighted with MUSLIM deaths

 

[subdued_passion]

yes

that YOU don't see that

is YOUR issue

LOON!

How would I see that? All I see is you starting threads which seem to imply that and it's hard to take your narrative to heart because you do have that habit of omitting facts quite often.

Sharia says that the constitutions of Kaffirs mean nothing.

Am I saying it? I do not have to; we can easily provide you with fresh example each day, as busybody is doing with this thread. The only thing I erred on was which precious minority was being protected from the consequences of their hate speech this time.

(Forget about what sharia says) If a person says something like, "burn all churches" at a rally, why is action not being taken against such a person?

]STOP BEING NAIVE

I prefer ingenue.

there is NO ONE that ISNT delighted with MUSLIM deaths

I am not delighted by violent murders, I don't care what the cause is or who the perpetrators or the victims.

 

[Busybody]

How would I see that? All I see is you starting threads which seem to imply that and it's hard to take your narrative to heart because you do have that habit of omitting facts quite often...........That isn't true at all



(Forget about what sharia says) If a person says something like, "burn all churches" at a rally, why is action not being taken against such a person?




I prefer ingenue. .........I'd rather be IN YOU



I am not delighted by violent murders, I don't care what the cause is or who the perpetrators or the victims..........Naive

 

[subdued_passion]

Come on PeePee, most times you either omit facts or present biased views. And I am not naive in not taking delight in violent deaths... I am with the majority on that one.

 

[Busybody]

Come on PeePee, most times you either omit facts or present biased views............untrue. And I am not naive in not taking delight in violent deaths... I am with the majority on that one.........I believe in their hearts, MOST DELIGHT IN MUSLIM DEATHS....

 

[Busybody]

stop calling me Pee Pee

I have a new Name

No HOMO!

 

[Busybody]

Brendan O’Neill: I’m sorry, but we have to talk about the barbarism of modern Islamist terrorism. “In Western news-making and opinion-forming circles, there’s a palpable reluctance to talk about the most noteworthy thing about modern Islamist violence: its barbarism, its graphic lack of moral restraint. This goes beyond the BBC’s yellow reluctance to deploy the T-word – terrorism – in relation to the bloody assault on the Westgate shopping mall in Kenya at the weekend. Across the commentating board, people are sheepish about pointing out the historically unique lunacy of Islamist violence and its utter detachment from any recognisable moral universe or human values. We have to talk about this barbarism; we have to appreciate how new and unusual it is, how different it is even from the terrorism of the 1970s or of the early twentieth century. We owe it to the victims of these assaults, and to the principle of honest and frank political debate, to face up to the unhinged, morally unanchored nature of Islamist violence in the 21st century.” Yes, but doing that might require unpleasant actions — or, worse, uncomfortable thoughts.