Really Bad But Deserving News For Democrats

When was the last time you ever refuted any of the sources I've used with evidence to the contrary? Never.
I don’t even click on them, they are just looking for traffic. Their “about us” say they are biased for one direction so nothing they have is worth the read. But I understand how you like it.

You get a cut of the click count somehow? Seems to be your play.

I look for the story posted to AP… what it’s not there… womp!
 
I don’t even click on them, they are just looking for traffic. Their “about us” say they are biased for one direction so nothing they have is worth the read. But I understand how you like it.

You get a cut of the click count somehow? Seems to be your play.

I look for the story posted to AP… what it’s not there… womp!

Every site and for that matter individual has a bias. I'd rather know what your bias is going in for a lot of reasons on any information than assume you're neutral.
 
Every site and for that matter individual has a bias.
True, but some are a lot more biased than others.
I'd rather know what your bias is going in for a lot of reasons on any information than assume you're neutral.
The thing is, the people here who frequently post from crazy right-wing sites either don't get that they are biased, or they don't care.
 
Every site and for that matter individual has a bias. I'd rather know what your bias is going in for a lot of reasons on any information than assume you're neutral.
And the right wing “news” sites bias removes their objectivity as they are always looking for the same angle… how can they own the libs with every story.

If any of the stories included these little things called…facts…then we are maybe in a conversation about the issue. Countless times there is a loose association to facts with the basis of stories coming from the right that they just assume are facts because someone told them so. (But 2 minutes spent verifying would show they aren’t- who needs to spend 2 minutes when you KNOW it’s “real”)

Just label each of their stories with opinion to call it what it really is. Or maybe they do that, but the word they use is Hunter.
 
It triggers the left the most because they have worked hard to almost outlaw the word in the Democrat media because they know that Communists are driving far-left Democrat party policy and it's the last thing they want the American people to associate them with. Academia and the Democrat media together have succeeded in elevating communists to sainthood on the nation's college campuses by referring to them as progressives. They are the prime movers behind the current demonstrations in support of Hamas terrorism and anti-Semitism and incidents like the subject of this thread.
Delusional histrionics. The whackadoodle right is attempting to move teh Overton Window further and further to the right, so Gunny's natural instinct is to insiste "nuh UH! It's actually moving to teh LEFT!"

I know, you know, Gunny's gonna DARVO!
 
Delusional histrionics. The whackadoodle right is attempting to move teh Overton Window further and further to the right, so Gunny's natural instinct is to insiste "nuh UH! It's actually moving to teh LEFT!"

I know, you know, Gunny's gonna DARVO!
Are you shit-faced again?
 
Because you're an intellectual coward who cannot bring herself to face reality.
You mean, your "chosen Reality"....*chuckles*

Quite the litany of entertainers here on Lit.
Carbon water boy

Chosen reality troll,

a whole slew of ammosexuals.

Such a great place to get a laugh!
 
Because you're an intellectual coward who cannot bring herself to face reality.
No, I have. Maybe like 5% of your posts I will click the link to verify a few things.

One-the “news” is still overly biased (always is)

Two-the stories may only have one loose fact, the rest is all commentary (which you foolishly think is factual)

Three-whenever the story references data, I eagerly follow that link to find (shock) your wrong-wing “brain” trust can’t even interpret the data they are citing. Often they just hope folks aren’t smart enough (and they are correct in your case) to follow the next link to determine on their own.

Since you throw out so many of these crap posts daily I would say I’m clicking on a link maybe once a week. I would need to check my math but I think 5% is a generous estimate.

But I can see how you love ALL of the stories!

Thanks for involving me, always appreciate it. Have a good thanksgiving?
 
Every site and for that matter individual has a bias. I'd rather know what your bias is going in for a lot of reasons on any information than assume you're neutral.
Ordinarily yes, but Rightguide’s links are not just biased but purposefully misleading and inaccurate to the extent you have to fact check everything his articles claim so it’s not worth the time or effort.
 
Then why don't you just shut the fuck up and save your ignorant energy?
I was thinking the same thing. There are days there aren’t endless streams of bile that pour from your keyboard… but you make up for it by doubling down the next day.

My guess, it takes that full day for you to accumulate all of those conservative email forwards that give you what to think and say.

As for me, just a game to see when you can find legit news sources for your trash fire each day. So far, haven’t seen any…or at least the percentage is so small one fails to notice. I do keep an eye out, even have the ballon drop gif ready for you…but likely I won’t ever need to use it.

Thanks for being so predictably wrong, wrong guide.
 
^
The "Prof" has obviously been triggered.

*nods*
Far from a prof but definitely triggered. I guess his fantasy team took a hit today with folks that are out and he’s so anxious because the playoffs are around the corner.

If he spent more time there then parroting the wrong-wing talking points…
 
Back
Top