DoctorWatson1975
Digital Artist
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2023
- Posts
- 107
At this point, I have been approached about 50 times by writers wanting me to draw an illustration for their story.
For free.
I realise that paid commissions aren't always what people are looking for, and there's no actual harm in asking for free art. Shoot your shot it's fine. I hold nothing against those who ask, and when I state that I only do paid commissions, part ways with no bad blood.
But there are often those who feel entitled to free art, for some reason, and it comes across poorly.
I'm writing this mainly so that I can link to it later, for them. Feel free to add your opinions.
This is in no way intended to imply that the ability to draw is superior to the ability to write. It takes the same amount of effort, time, talent and imagination to write good erotica as it takes to illustrate it. I want to get this out of the way because most (not all) writers turn combative when I ask for money, with the mindset that I think I'm 'superior' to them, just because I'm asking them for money.
"I'm writing for free in Literotica...why do you think you are entitled to money? You should do it for the creative satisfaction!" - or variations of this logic are the most common when I refuse to draw for free for them. Except I do draw for free. I have 22 FREE drawings published here. Just like your free stories. Drawn and shared only for "creative satisfaction". Nobody asked me to draw these illustrations.
"But it's my idea that you'll be drawing. Why should you be paid by me when the idea is mine!" - the second most common logic offered when asking for free art. Unfortunately, while writing a story is certainly an exercise in creativity, articulating an "idea"...not so much. Even if you write a whole story and ask me to illustrate it...I didn't ask you to write it, did I?
You expect me to spend anywhere between 4 to 8 hours working on 'I want you to draw X doing Y to Z while A does B standing on C, looking at P wearing a Q while holding an R"? Pay me.
"I can't afford it..." usually followed by insisting on free work or a demand for marked reduction in my quoted price. Why would you assume that you can't afford it but I can?
Bargaining/negotiation is fine, but that's a two way street. If you offer less money, you will probably get a rougher, quicker and simpler drawing than what I usually would draw. My prices are based on what I anticipate to be the amount of time and effort I will take to make what you ask. I know that if my prices are unfair, the market will punish me for it. I've come to these prices after years of trial and error and as of now, they work for me. I certainly don't plan to generate generational wealth doing this, and I'm not trying to hustle you.
"Will you collaborate with me by drawing an illustration for my story?"- ie- "I've put in the creative effort of writing a story, now you put in the creative effort of illustrating it and we'll be equal partners on publication...and no money needs to change hands." In a fair collaboration, I get a story I want, and you get an artwork you want. But if you look closely here, you're getting artwork you want for your story. I'm not getting anything. How is this a collaboration?
When you ask me to draw something for you, I'm entitled to payment for my time and effort. Just like you would be entitled to payment if I asked you to write something for me. Writing commissions are fairly common. Not just that...if I asked you if I could draw something from a story you've already written, you'd be well within your rights to ask me to pay you if I want to draw it.
When demand meets supply, demand pays.
For free.
I realise that paid commissions aren't always what people are looking for, and there's no actual harm in asking for free art. Shoot your shot it's fine. I hold nothing against those who ask, and when I state that I only do paid commissions, part ways with no bad blood.
But there are often those who feel entitled to free art, for some reason, and it comes across poorly.
I'm writing this mainly so that I can link to it later, for them. Feel free to add your opinions.
This is in no way intended to imply that the ability to draw is superior to the ability to write. It takes the same amount of effort, time, talent and imagination to write good erotica as it takes to illustrate it. I want to get this out of the way because most (not all) writers turn combative when I ask for money, with the mindset that I think I'm 'superior' to them, just because I'm asking them for money.
"I'm writing for free in Literotica...why do you think you are entitled to money? You should do it for the creative satisfaction!" - or variations of this logic are the most common when I refuse to draw for free for them. Except I do draw for free. I have 22 FREE drawings published here. Just like your free stories. Drawn and shared only for "creative satisfaction". Nobody asked me to draw these illustrations.
"But it's my idea that you'll be drawing. Why should you be paid by me when the idea is mine!" - the second most common logic offered when asking for free art. Unfortunately, while writing a story is certainly an exercise in creativity, articulating an "idea"...not so much. Even if you write a whole story and ask me to illustrate it...I didn't ask you to write it, did I?
You expect me to spend anywhere between 4 to 8 hours working on 'I want you to draw X doing Y to Z while A does B standing on C, looking at P wearing a Q while holding an R"? Pay me.
"I can't afford it..." usually followed by insisting on free work or a demand for marked reduction in my quoted price. Why would you assume that you can't afford it but I can?
Bargaining/negotiation is fine, but that's a two way street. If you offer less money, you will probably get a rougher, quicker and simpler drawing than what I usually would draw. My prices are based on what I anticipate to be the amount of time and effort I will take to make what you ask. I know that if my prices are unfair, the market will punish me for it. I've come to these prices after years of trial and error and as of now, they work for me. I certainly don't plan to generate generational wealth doing this, and I'm not trying to hustle you.
"Will you collaborate with me by drawing an illustration for my story?"- ie- "I've put in the creative effort of writing a story, now you put in the creative effort of illustrating it and we'll be equal partners on publication...and no money needs to change hands." In a fair collaboration, I get a story I want, and you get an artwork you want. But if you look closely here, you're getting artwork you want for your story. I'm not getting anything. How is this a collaboration?
When you ask me to draw something for you, I'm entitled to payment for my time and effort. Just like you would be entitled to payment if I asked you to write something for me. Writing commissions are fairly common. Not just that...if I asked you if I could draw something from a story you've already written, you'd be well within your rights to ask me to pay you if I want to draw it.
When demand meets supply, demand pays.
Last edited: