Quick Sex

[ReadyOne]

Guys can get ready to fuck almost instantly. A girl smiles, maybe shows some skin, and far as the guy goes, he's hard and ready to plunge it in. They're always ready for sex and orgasms.

Of course, women need more time to build arousal. Some say that women can't get horny without the emotional bond, which takes time to build. The old saying, "Women give sex to get love, men give love to get sex".

Yes, stereotypes. But my point is that men can get and get off quick, but most of the time in MF they can't get off quick because they have to invest time in getting the woman ready, willing, and eager. And then when they've come, they're finished and ready to sleep or run.

Can guy-guy sex can be quick, hard, full speed from the get-go, a rapid buildup to a swift orgasmic finish?

If you are (have been) in a MF relationship, did you seek MM because it didn't require all the stuff females need?

Guys, is this difference something you (sometime? often?) seek? Is it important to you?

 

[Moonlust]

Yes, you said it's a stereotype, but just wanted to point out that not every woman needs "stuff." I'm pretty unromantic, in general, and find quickness a lot more exciting.

 

[Mikijl Dragon]

I find women tend to have moods where they like one or the other. My wife sometimes likes the I come through the door throw her on the bed and have rough and tumble sex in an instant. Other tiems she like the smooth work up of an hour or so of foreplay or even a all day teasing each other kinda thing. It would be unfair to ay that anyone wants it one way all the time.

As for the boyfriend and I there is a little work up between us. I dont think we have ever done the instant sex. I also see though where thast could be possible, just have not done it.

 

[CJontherocks]

That difference is not something I seek at all. Or at least, I never really thought about it. The buildup, for me, leads to the passion and the heat that makes the climax so much more intense. But the buildup doesn't have to be an hour of physical foreplay either. It can be the excitement of something new or risky, or the anticipation after some teasing, or just the wanting of a particular person. In fact, as far as MM sex is concerned, lately I've been giving a lot of thought to that whole passionate soulful sex thing that I get with women. My experiences with men have been more of a "monkey sex" kinda thing, and I'm not quite satisfied with that any more.

Not that there's anything wrong with grabbin' her/him by the hair and gettin' dirty... that can be fun too. All in all, I'd have to say it depends on what it is about the person I'm with that turns me on. With some people I might just wanna get it on. Others, I might want a long, languid touching-of-the-souls kind of thing. Either way it has little if anything to do with gender.

So the short answer is no, and no.

 

[eepy]

What about a FF sexual encounter?

If both girls fit the female stereotype, it'd be completely emotional, slow, etc.

I think that's another reason I'm contemplating the bisexuality thing. I'm tired of the stereotypical male (and the stereotype does, indeed, fit every guy I've been with). Wouldn't it make more sense, then, to look for a female who, like me, cannot separate the emotional from the physical when it comes to sex? Wouldn't that mean a lot less hurt and frustration?

For those who have had FF relationships, does that hold true, or is there just as much fucking-for-the-sake-of-fucking as in a FM situation?

 

[deezire1900]

I think in a FF it depends on the situation and the woman. I am not able to orgasm as quickly as others, but it isn't always about me. I dated a girl that could cum in 2 minutes if I kissed her hard and played with her nipples...that was fun. We could do it anywhere (well, almost anywhere) she thought i got cheated, but to me it was the quick sex i craved, i really didn't care if she was the only one that screamed my name.

I think FF sex is usually longer, slower, and filled with more passion, because that is how most (my opinion) like it.