questions about fantasies (how far & what like)

Phoenix Stone

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jan 25, 2004
Posts
1,292
Okey-dokey, then. Time to ask those questions I've been avoiding. Will be as clear as I can.

1. Do those of you who are satisfied with where you are, and how deeply you've gone into this, find that you need to go as far as your fantasies go before you were satisfied? Or is the fact that it's rl mean you found you didn't need as much intensity?

2. Am I the only one who isn't in her own cum fantasies? What I think about to orgasm are scenarios, like little movies, and I'm not in them. They just happen in my mind like movies.

3. Am I the only one whose cum fantasies (as opposed to, say, daydreams) are of vague shadowy people -- like an old tv with really bad reception? What they are doing is clear but generally I couldn't even tell you what color their hair is, and I don't see features, except as is necessary to the plot.;) (Hard to picture deep-throat, lips to belly, and eyes bulging, without said features.)

All for now. Thanks.:eek:
 
Phoenix Stone said:
Okey-dokey, then. Time to ask those questions I've been avoiding. Will be as clear as I can.

1. Do those of you who are satisfied with where you are, and how deeply you've gone into this, find that you need to go as far as your fantasies go before you were satisfied? Or is the fact that it's rl mean you found you didn't need as much intensity?

I am not really experienced enough to answer this one. To take a shot at it though, my fantasies are not totally "out there" so I do think that at some point I'd like to realize most of them.

Phoenix Stone said:

2. Am I the only one who isn't in her own cum fantasies? What I think about to orgasm are scenarios, like little movies, and I'm not in them. They just happen in my mind like movies.

I do think that I am in all of them. They seem to be in first person, so I have no choice but to think I'm the one seeing what is happening.


Phoenix Stone said:

3. Am I the only one whose cum fantasies (as opposed to, say, daydreams) are of vague shadowy people -- like an old tv with really bad reception? What they are doing is clear but generally I couldn't even tell you what color their hair is, and I don't see features, except as is necessary to the plot.;) (Hard to picture deep-throat, lips to belly, and eyes bulging, without said features.)

All for now. Thanks.:eek:

No, I think that they are usually specific people. I do make it a point not to picture in my head anyone that I know in real life, so they tend to be strangers, but familiar anyway.
 
1. I certainly have fantasies I do not want to live out in real life. They stay better as just fantasies.

2. It is more common there is someone else having sex than that it is myself. And if it is with myself, I'm usually watching it as a thrid part rather than see myself interacting.

3. Differs. I dont have old TV quality or something, but I do have tunnel vision on some things/situations I guess.
 
I think there’s a difference in the way men and women fantasize… personally I have very ‘real’, detailed and calculated sexual fantasies. Usually I fantasize about someone I know (fe. from Lit;))

I have the impression this kind of explicit fantasies are typically male, while women may let their mind wander and just dream up their ideal sex partner…. an ex-girlfriend didn’t even think of men as she masturbated, just a bunch of floating cocks that would fuck her in all holes…

And some of my fantasies are definitely not for real life…
:eek:

Wolf
 
Phoenix Stone said:
Okey-dokey, then. Time to ask those questions I've been avoiding. Will be as clear as I can.

1. Do those of you who are satisfied with where you are, and how deeply you've gone into this, find that you need to go as far as your fantasies go before you were satisfied? Or is the fact that it's rl mean you found you didn't need as much intensity?

2. Am I the only one who isn't in her own cum fantasies? What I think about to orgasm are scenarios, like little movies, and I'm not in them. They just happen in my mind like movies.

3. Am I the only one whose cum fantasies (as opposed to, say, daydreams) are of vague shadowy people -- like an old tv with really bad reception? What they are doing is clear but generally I couldn't even tell you what color their hair is, and I don't see features, except as is necessary to the plot.;) (Hard to picture deep-throat, lips to belly, and eyes bulging, without said features.)

All for now. Thanks.:eek:

1. No answer for that one yet

2. Sometimes, sometimes it's definitely first person

3. You're definitely not the only one here. It's hard as hell to explain to someone, too. IF and when there's a recognizable feature, face, or person in my fantasies, it's usually because i'm pretty deeply involved with them. Otherwise, it's a vague, shadowy, fuzzy anyman in my mind.
 
most of my favorite fantasies are pretty intense, and since they just involve me and my master and its my body and up to me what i do with it, i want to do them all in real life. sure there are some fantasies that need to just stay in your head-i have those too. but my "main" fantasies, i want to do in real life.

about not being in your own fantasies when you masturbate-no yr not the only one, i do that too. i might imagine a guy who i think is hot, watching him fuck two girls and neither are me..watching him please them effortlessly because he is so fucking HOT...like im watching a movie. :)
 
wolf2002 said:
just a bunch of floating cocks that would fuck her in all holes…

LOL!!

I've had a few with only a knife and a hand, and no person attatched to it but that's as close as I can get.
 
dreaming_lilith said:
LOL!!

I've had a few with only a knife and a hand, and no person attatched to it but that's as close as I can get.

Yeah, sick isn;t it? I broke up with her right after she told me that :D
 
Wow, ot a bit but since I started this, wouldn't it be interesting to see a sex video made the way it seems a lot of women truly have fantasies? Much more surrealistic? And even for most men, don't you think a lot of people fantasize with more tone, intensity, quickcuts? More like music vids or commercials and less like rl scenes? The way we subjectively feel the world, rather than the way it objectively exists in reality?

I don't know about you all but when I'm turned on, I'm focussing differently on what's in front of me. A very different perspective than what I've ever seen in any porn.
Kinda impressionistic, with swooping closeups, some hyperrealistic quickcuts, even almost kaleidoscopic because of thinking and viewing several things at once and rapidly, and a lot of pinpoint focus with the rest of the view soft focus. Hard to describe but way different from the flat, straightforward way the porn I've seen seems to proceed.

(Eventually I'll get brave enough to ask the questions I'm still avoiding. Thank you so much for answering. to hear how it is for others is very reassuring.)
 
wolf2002 said:
Yeah, sick isn;t it? I broke up with her right after she told me that :D

Hehe, did it give you a complex that you only had one? :rolleyes:

I'm more into quality.

Phoenix Stone, I can tell you on thing I DON'T think about. In alot of the stories here the give a standard description on lenght, weight, bra size/cock size etc. I don't think I've ever considered any of those when I'm "scrolling"...
 
Phoenix Stone said:

1. Do those of you who are satisfied with where you are, and how deeply you've gone into this, find that you need to go as far as your fantasies go before you were satisfied? Or is the fact that it's rl mean you found you didn't need as much intensity?


Not sure I will ever be ready to say I have arrived at my desired destination..it is a continuous journey with many twists and turns, and a few surprises along the way. I would have to say that r/l experiences and discussions of future explorations tends to fuel my fantasies these days, as much inspired by as a means to preparing psychologically for further exploration.

2. Am I the only one who isn't in her own cum fantasies? What I think about to orgasm are scenarios, like little movies, and I'm not in them. They just happen in my mind like movies.

Usually I am somewhere in them, though in my fantasies there are often no images, more a sense of knowing, feeling, and experiencing. Before this relationship, I used to fantasise about many things, as I still do, but often my partner of the time did not feature in them or my dreams...that has changed and my dreams and fantasies are never without his presence in some form or context. Rarely do I fantasise about orgasm...save that foir the reality time.

3. Am I the only one whose cum fantasies (as opposed to, say, daydreams) are of vague shadowy people -- like an old tv with really bad reception? What they are doing is clear but generally I couldn't even tell you what color their hair is, and I don't see features, except as is necessary to the plot.;) (Hard to picture deep-throat, lips to belly, and eyes bulging, without said features.)

As I said, I rarely even visualise my fantasies in a seeing sense, concentrating more on thoughts and feelings/sensations that accompany those thoughts. Dreams are the same in that though they are movie like most times and in colour, they rarely feature a face/s though the identity of familiar people is known to me through sensory perception. Has always seemed weird to me, but has served me well throughout my life as I seem to have extremely vivid fantasies and dreams which do not seem to suffer from the lack of graphic visualisations and physical features. Even stranger, my daydreaming can be visual in the most minute and graphic form.

Catalina :rose:
 
Phoenix Stone said:


(Eventually I'll get brave enough to ask the questions I'm still avoiding. Thank you so much for answering. to hear how it is for others is very reassuring.)

now that made me HELLA curious :devil: which questions are you avoiding? you can ask them here-most of the ppl on this board are pretty cool/openminded, and if anyone gives you shit for yr questions i'll back you up ;)
 
1. Do those of you who are satisfied with where you are, and how deeply you've gone into this, find that you need to go as far as your fantasies go before you were satisfied? Or is the fact that it's rl mean you found you didn't need as much intensity?

I don't need anywhere the level of intensity in r/l. Fantasies are one thing, r/f is something else

2. Am I the only one who isn't in her own cum fantasies? What I think about to orgasm are scenarios, like little movies, and I'm not in them. They just happen in my mind like movies.

I'm the star in my own fantasies! Always. Uh, well, sometimes I'm the co-star, but I'm always there. It's always about me.

3. Am I the only one whose cum fantasies (as opposed to, say, daydreams) are of vague shadowy people -- like an old tv with really bad reception? What they are doing is clear but generally I couldn't even tell you what color their hair is, and I don't see features, except as is necessary to the plot. (Hard to picture deep-throat, lips to belly, and eyes bulging, without said features.)

I see very clear images in my head, usually. When I don't, something's wrong, and the session doesn't last. When things are right, I see myself and faces I know, doing things I've seen elsewhere. It's always with familiar faces, but the actions can come from anywhere. I have a few favorite fantasy fucks, and when I dream up a new situation, I insert one of the familiar faces, and wander into paradise.
 
Hmm, so far their seems to be a male-female diff here in clarity and visual nature of fantasy imagery, at least.
 
Back
Top