Putin's Internet Plan Requires 'Sharing' With Security Services

Byron In Exile

Frederick Fucking Chopin
Joined
May 3, 2002
Posts
66,591
By Corey Flintoff

(NPR) — Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a new measure that will give the government much greater control over the Internet.

Critics say the law is aimed at silencing opposition bloggers and restricting what people can say on social media. It would also force international email providers and social networks to make their users' information available to the Russian security services.

Putin sent a chill through many Internet users late last month with this comment at a media forum: "You do know that it all began initially, when the Internet first appeared, as a special CIA project. And this is the way it is developing."

Putin said Americans set the system up so that everything would go through servers in the United States, where intelligence agencies could monitor it.

The president's statement came as Russia's parliament was working on a package of bills that would place restrictions on bloggers and websites.

Bloggers Must Register

"The objective of those laws is to block the Russian Internet from the rest of the world," says Anton Nosik, a popular blogger, "and to shut down the biggest foreign social networks, to block access to foreign social networks for Russian users, and to establish control over networks that are physically based in Russia."

One key provision of the law, which is scheduled to take effect in August, would require bloggers to register with the government if their blogs receive more than 3,000 hits a day.

Registered bloggers would then be treated like mass media and required to certify the factual accuracy of the information in their blogs, but they wouldn't have the same protections and privileges as other journalists.

One of the leading sponsors of the law, Irina Yarovaya, made it clear what lawmakers are aiming for — an end to anonymity on the Internet in Russia.

"In principle, anonymity is always deception," she said in an interview earlier this year. "It's a wish to mislead someone. I can't see any reason to raise lying to [the status of] a human virtue or an understanding of what freedom is."

The law also gives the government new grounds to press charges against bloggers, including "defamation" and "inciting hatred."

New Restrictions For Social Networks

Journalist Kirill Martynov says these rather vaguely defined offenses could make it impossible to express meaningful opinions.

"I can't incite hatred toward fascists, for example, or I can't criticize police officers," Martynov says. "I think anything that's published in a blog, that's not to the authorities' liking, can be used against the person who writes the blog."

Another provision of the law prohibits revealing information about citizens' homes and their personal or family lives. Critics say that provision could be used against anti-corruption bloggers who have revealed embarrassing details about undeclared bank accounts and luxurious homes owned by public officials.

Finally, Nosik notes that the law says that all email providers and social networks must store information about users, their posts and their email on servers in Russia.

"This is what Russian authorities traditionally request from local platforms, and they are always given that information," he says. "I doubt it strongly that Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, or other Google services will ever comply. And if they don't comply, they have to be blocked. That's what the law says."
 
Newly Signed Law Could Give Putin Total Control of Russia's Internet

By Polly Mosendz

The Wire

Vladimir Putin is going to new lengths to control not just the actions, but the words of his people. The Russian president just signed a new law, passed by the legislature on Monday, that will allow the government to monitor and censor more of the Internet. This comes on the same day that he ruled that swearing is not allowed in movies, theater, or in concerts as of July 1.

The online regulations, which go into effect August 1, are aimed at silencing opposition websites, while also providing the Russian government with a wealth of user data. The law requires blogs with 3,000 or more unique visitors per day to register as "mass media." Those bloggers will be held to the same standards as other mass media, in that they will be "required to certify the factual accuracy of the information in their blogs" or risk punishment.

Irina Yarovaya, one of the leading sponsors of the law, told NPR, "In principle, anonymity is always deception. It's a wish to mislead someone. I can't see any reason to raise lying to [the status of] a human virtue or an understanding of what freedom is." The new regulations can, and likely will, successfully shutter digital anonymity in Russia.

Another clause in the law is directed at a practice opposition bloggers have taken up recently: revealing the personal information, such as addresses and secret bank accounts, of public officials. The law now prohibits revealing information about a person's home and personal life online.

The law also requires that all distributors of online content keep user data for six months after its creation within Russia. This will allow the Kremlin direct access to email providers and social networks that serve Russian citizens. The six-month storage clause will force foreign Internet providers to comply with Russia's request for user data, or else risk getting subpoenaed by the Russian government.

This is not so simple, as a company can be active in Russia without having servers there. Putin is looking to change that: "With regard to the civil sphere, here it is necessary to transfer servers. It is possible to do, but it takes time and capital investment." However flawed, his thought process for this law seems to be that he wants to creating a local version of the U.S.-dominated server system. But he is going one step further, aiming to use servers as a state-controlled data source. While the subpoenas might be sent, it is unlikely that companies without Russian-based servers would comply. This includes the likes of Facebook and Twitter, though Google does have one server in Russia.

If a website or internet provider does not comply with the Kremlin's request for data, they will be hit with a fine of 50,000 to 300,000 Rubles ($1,413 to $8,479 USD.) This is a minimal fine for web giants like Google, but for smaller websites, it could take them out of business completely. The compliance regulations do not stop there. In the event the fines aren't doing the trick, websites can be shut down or have their content filtered. In a worst case scenario, Google and its subsidiaries (mainly YouTube) could become banned in Russia.

While Putin is hungry for information about his internal opposition, this law also stems from a resurgence in Cold War sentiment. Putin associates the world wide web with the United States, recently telling reporters: "You do know that it all began initially, when the Internet first appeared, as a special CIA project. And this is the way it is developing."
 
Its not Putin's plan, the legislation originated in the Duma, just as if a bill originated in the US Congress.

Its an unfortunate piece of legislation, and there is plenty of opposition in Russia, including among leaders in the internet industry. That said, the proposal is not as different from much of the legislation that has been proposed in many Western countries. Its not as "extreme" as anti-Russia hysteria mongers are claiming, and in fact, some of the proposals already exist in western countries (I'm not defending the legislation BTW).
 
"This is what Russian authorities traditionally request from local platforms, and they are always given that information," he says. "I doubt it strongly that Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, or other Google services will ever comply. And if they don't comply, they have to be blocked. That's what the law says."

Hmm, that's an interesting point. Russia has its own domestic competitors with many of those sites, for example, it has its own version of Facebook, vk.com. Perhaps the legislation is a veiled protectionist measure, knowing that the "western" companies won't comply, will be blocked, and will free Russian internet companies from competition.
 
"In principle, anonymity is always deception," she said in an interview earlier this year. "It's a wish to mislead someone. I can't see any reason to raise lying to [the status of] a human virtue or an understanding of what freedom is."

Anonymity is not "lying" its called protecting privacy and putting the focus on the message rather than the messenger. Its "lying" to judge an opinion based on who's expressing it rather than judging the message itself. Anonymity allows for true exchange of ideas, without fear of retribution or discrimination.

Not to mention some of the greatest writers in history have used pen names. Pen names are one of the oldest traditions in writing.
 
Last edited:
Its not Putin's plan, the legislation originated in the Duma, just as if a bill originated in the US Congress.

Its an unfortunate piece of legislation, and there is plenty of opposition in Russia, including among leaders in the internet industry. That said, the proposal is not as different from much of the legislation that has been proposed in many Western countries. Its not as "extreme" as anti-Russia hysteria mongers are claiming, and in fact, some of the proposals already exist in western countries (I'm not defending the legislation BTW).

Hmm, that's an interesting point. Russia has its own domestic competitors with many of those sites, for example, it has its own version of Facebook, vk.com. Perhaps the legislation is a veiled protectionist measure, knowing that the "western" companies won't comply, will be blocked, and will free Russian internet companies from competition.

Anonymity is not "lying" its called protecting privacy and putting the focus on the message rather than the messenger. Its "lying" to judge an opinion based on who's expressing it rather than judging the message itself. Anonymity allows for true exchange of ideas, without fear of retribution or discrimination.

Not to mention some of the greatest writers in history have used pen names. Pen names are one of the oldest traditions in writing.

Doesn't Google already share information about users with the US government?
Renard, you are one thoroughly confused individual.
 
I just hope Putin won't block me from my beloved porn sites, most of those are set anywhere but in Russia.

Renard, Duma does anything Putin's puppetmasters tell them.
 
Hey, everyone knows that the Internet, like Capitalism, is a dangerous thing without a lot of government regulation protecting us from harm be it coal or offensive thoughts. I get a chubby just thinking about Russians not having to ever see a single busybody post.

:kbate:
 
I thought that outside of the title, it originated in the Senate...


;) ;)

... maybe it was the Apollo Alliance.
 
I thought that outside of the title, it originated in the Senate...

;) ;)

... maybe it was the Apollo Alliance.
And now that the penalty is a tax, looks like maybe they better find a way to make it a penalty again.

Just keep shifting it depending on the current lawsuit...
 
And now that the penalty is a tax, looks like maybe they better find a way to make it a penalty again.

Just keep shifting it depending on the current lawsuit...

It wasn't a tax the day before it was a tax.

I do not honestly know what is worse, that or the Submariner's Highway when it comes to describing our government...
 
Putin's right about one thing...most internet traffic is monitored by the US Govt...why should he let Russians be spied on by the NSA?
 
Back
Top