Psycho Bitch Invokes The Don While Assaulting Multiple Deputies.

[AsmodeusPrime]

I do so enjoy as your MAGA group likes to claim people are ignorant and provide no structure for that argument.
.

I just brought the receipts for that argument.

You can't even make a point much less an argument 99% of the time.

 

[HisArpy]

I do so enjoy as your MAGA group likes to claim people are ignorant and provide no structure for that argument.

Your say so as to the veracity of my arguments is hardly the form of a legitimate arbiter.

Yours is one that continues to argue election fraud and that Jan 6 was not a coup attempt. So if you want to be serious about anything, start there. If not, then please don’t suppose to think that your evaluation of any position will be met with any sincerity.

But yeah, as always, thanks for the opportunity.

Lol on the complete lack of veracity of your argument while you're simultaneously saying that mine aren't supported even though I produce links backing up what I post.

I didn't argue that there was election fraud. What I did was point out that YOU saying there wasn't because all of the lawsuits over it were tossed out "because there wasn't any evidence" is false.

YOU took a technical procedural issue and turned it into "no evidence" when it's clear that all that happened was the courts said the suits couldn't be heard. Note, that's not "a lack of evidence" as you claim it to be.



P.S. You can pick up your ass with the hatcheck girl on your walk of shame on the way out.

 

[dkovic77]

Lol on the complete lack of veracity of your argument while you're simultaneously saying that mine aren't supported even though I produce links backing up what I post.

I didn't argue that there was election fraud. What I did was point out that YOU saying there wasn't because all of the lawsuits over it were tossed out "because there wasn't any evidence" is false.

YOU took a technical procedural issue and turned it into "no evidence" when it's clear that all that happened was the courts said the suits couldn't be heard. Note, that's not "a lack of evidence" as you claim it to be.



P.S. You can pick up your ass with the hatcheck girl on your walk of shame on the way out.

So cute that you think the two cases are any where near similar. It’s not a double standard when one doesn’t have clearly the evidence that the second has. The Republican AG (any of them… ) could have and didn’t do what you wanted them to do. You say… there is evidence, then they should have prosecuted. Either you have the cards or you don’t. In this case, the AGs didn’t think they had the cards.

Unlike the 2020 supposed election fraud cases, who cares if there is evidence and file away with wreckless abandon.

And now the classified documents case, sure seems like the evidence is fully there (and keeps being there, with new stuff found) so in comparison, to all of this- I stand by my statements.

 

[jomar]

site issues and don’t want to rewrite

 

[dkovic77]

site issues and don’t want to rewrite

Awww, not even worth your time? Usually a select all, copy, refresh, and then paste works just fine.

I have found I have to do it when replying to Linus and he makes an edit to his original post while I am responding. He sure likes to shift arguments around hoping that confusion of the reply makes his assertions at all credible.

At the end of the day, they fall flat. But he thinks he wins, it’s kinda adorable (like a toddler learning to walk) but sad (when it’s an adult).

 

[jomar]

Awww, not even worth your time?

Eh, it was an ode to Harpy’s legal prowess, his assertion we buy his appeal to his authority that we, not being lawyers, have no clue why cases can be dismissed on technicalities rather than lack of evidence, while providing no link to prove his point while claiming he did-so I dismissed his claim for lack of evidence.

Usually a select all, copy, refresh, and then paste works just fine.

Usually, yes. But it locked up and I lost both the all copy and the post when I refreshed.

I have found I have to do it when replying to Linus and he makes an edit to his original post while I am responding. He sure likes to shift arguments around hoping that confusion of the reply makes his assertions at all credible.

Yes, he called me a prick for keeping a discussion on point and not responding to his off point creep.

 

[jaF0]

Audrey keeps screaming 'feed me' and y'all keep answering the bell.

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fgoldenarmor.com%2Fstorage%2FJUMBOAUDREY2.jpg%3F__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION%3D1380715610070&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=cdcceaa20c9485a2d67f14a85915dee753d1da34b2b18954e495a91e7cdc419f&ipo=images


Yet you can't even get her name right.

 

[HisArpy]

So cute that you think the two cases are any where near similar. It’s not a double standard when one doesn’t have clearly the evidence that the second has. The Republican AG (any of them… ) could have and didn’t do what you wanted them to do. You say… there is evidence, then they should have prosecuted. Either you have the cards or you don’t. In this case, the AGs didn’t think they had the cards.

Unlike the 2020 supposed election fraud cases, who cares if there is evidence and file away with wreckless abandon.

And now the classified documents case, sure seems like the evidence is fully there (and keeps being there, with new stuff found) so in comparison, to all of this- I stand by my statements.

Lol, that's not what I said. I said that the cases were tossed on procedural grounds (ie technicalities).

You're the one who keeps ranting about there not being any evidence even after I showed you that you can file a case and demand discovery to GET the evidence you need to prove your case.

It's like you're stuck on stupid and are now insisting on proving it in public, whether we want to know or not.

 

[HisArpy]

Eh, it was an ode to Harpy’s legal prowess, his assertion we buy his appeal to his authority that we, not being lawyers, have no clue why cases can be dismissed on technicalities rather than lack of evidence, while providing no link to prove his point while claiming he did-so I dismissed his claim for lack of evidence.


Usually, yes. But it locked up and I lost both the all copy and the post when I refreshed.


Yes, he called me a prick for keeping a discussion on point and not responding to his off point creep.

Poor baby, making excuses for deleting your post, after spending all that time foaming at the mouth while writing it. You must be crushed emotionally.

 

[jomar]

Poor baby, making excuses for deleting your post, after spending all that time foaming at the mouth while writing it. You must be crushed emotionally.

Nah, I might edit for clarity, but I don’t delete my posts.

You, on the other hand, need to seriously step up your insult game.

 

[dkovic77]

Eh, it was an ode to Harpy’s legal prowess, his assertion we buy his appeal to his authority that we, not being lawyers, have no clue why cases can be dismissed on technicalities rather than lack of evidence, while providing no link to prove his point while claiming he did-so I dismissed his claim for lack of evidence.


Usually, yes. But it locked up and I lost both the all copy and the post when I refreshed.


Yes, he called me a prick for keeping a discussion on point and not responding to his off point creep.

Takes all kinds out there.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Nah, I might edit for clarity, but I don’t delete my posts.

You, on the other hand, need to seriously step up your insult game.

I'm miss the GOFUCKYOURSELF reply... guess he feels it has gotten old.

 

[wallstreetguy]

She is like all RINOs: entitled, destructive, combative, egotistical and wishes harm on others.

 

[HisArpy]

Nah, I might edit for clarity, but I don’t delete my posts.

You, on the other hand, need to seriously step up your insult game.

Except, somehow, your post went "missing"?

There isn't a PanaMax ship big enough to carry the boatload of lol's that one brings to the table.

 

[HisArpy]

I'm miss the GOFUCKYOURSELF reply... guess he feels it has gotten old.

Teachers can always tell when the lesson has been well ingrained. Once that happens they can move on to the next one.

 

[jomar]

Except, somehow, your post went "missing"?

Yes, like I said the site “froze” and wouldn’t accept the post. So I “copied all”, refreshed and poof, the complete pending post and the clipboard disappeared. What got posted was mostly incomplete so I just nixed it.

There isn't a PanaMax ship big enough to carry the boatload of lol's that one brings to the table.

You have an odd sense of humor.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Teachers can always tell when the lesson has been well ingrained. Once that happens they can move on to the next one.

Rent free eh? *chuckles*

 

[HisArpy]

You have an odd sense of humor.

You say that like it's a bad thing.

 

[My I]

Did she mention what her Pronouns were?