Psycho Bitch Invokes The Don While Assaulting Multiple Deputies.

Again, stealing classified government documents is illegal, and trying to cover it up is also illegal.
You are correct, but in the other thread, you condemn the FBI for prosecuting exactly this very crime. (Because, in your opinion, stealing classified government documents is PERFECTLY legal as long as Donald Trump does it.)
 
No pivoting. Why are you so delusional??



I understand there are anti-free speech people out there and that you super duper extra ultra mega hate free speech.

You and other democrats hatred of civil liberties is what makes you lot anti-American.



Project all you want.
Dude, I've had just about enough of you for one day.

At some point, I am going to track you down. Find out your home address, and post it not only on here, but on every ANTIFA and far-left website I can find. Then find your place of work (that is assuming you have a job) and post THAT address. And after doing so, openly encourage far-left activists to find you, and teach you a lesson.

Because, that's "Free Speech."

To the forum moderators, this should not be considered as real threat, nor do I intend to follow through, because I am only trying to make a point- which "Chad" here doesn't seem to grasp:
That being, there are limits to "Free Speech" in a peaceful civilized society. In a violent right-wing anarchist society then of course, this would be perfectly okay.
 
You are correct, but in the other thread, you condemn the FBI for prosecuting exactly this very crime. (Because, in your opinion, stealing classified government documents is PERFECTLY legal as long as Donald Trump does it.)

Yes I think the FBI being a partisan weapon is bad.

And if you can't beat them, join them..... if it's ok for Clinton, it's ok for Trump.

Dude, I've had just about enough of you for one day.

LOL ok.

At some point, I am going to track you down. Find out your home address, and post it not only on here, but on every ANTIFA and far-left website I can find. Then find your place of work (that is assuming you have a job) and post THAT address. And after doing so, openly encourage far-left activists to find you, and teach you a lesson.

Because, that's "Free Speech."

Promise???
https://media.tenor.com/PDxKLdGZ5mwAAAAd/amos-burton-amos.gif

I live in Palo Pinto Co. Texas bubba... go on and send yer BLM and AntiFa's on out here.

To the forum moderators, this should not be considered as real threat, nor do I intend to follow through, because I am only trying to make a point- which "Chad" here doesn't seem to grasp:
That being, there are limits to "Free Speech" in a peaceful civilized society.

You can church it up and justify the censorship all you like..... still censorship.... still anti-free speech.

In a violent right-wing anarchist society then of course, this would be perfectly okay.
Nope....free speech isn't violence, it in fact requires peace.
 
Last edited:
Nice random deflection.
But true. Your freedoms are not as unlimited as you claim. There are these things called, laws.
What relevance is any of that??
Those that operate in actual truth, facts, and thinking who are not racist and a white supremacist don’t seem to get blocked.

You keep saying all you are saying is true, however we all kinds of evidence to the contrary. So answer the question if you actually can…. How many screen names? How many times blocked?

More that 10? More than 20? More than 50?

And I’m sure you probably have the posts saved that got you blocked each time, so proud of them because of your free speech allows you to say whatever you want and it’s just these anti-free speech folks here that all are at fault. But as I have tried to point out, there are consequences everywhere- maybe not from a government but a society.

So, for giggles, try being actually truthful one time on these boards, what’s the number?

Even more, since you are so proud, what were all of the names… (especially if you need to count them by listing them)

I’ll come back and check later in the week, I’m sure it will take some time.
 
https://www.nola.com/news/crime_pol...cle_592e7ee2-728d-11ed-9b91-9345a9dda9b2.html


In the scuffle, she injured six deputies, biting one on the arm and breaking the skin, and kicking another in the groin, Rivarde said. They were treated there by paramedics.

All the while, Epstein shouted that the deputies were going to lose their jobs or end up in jail, boasting that she was related to powerful people and that her uncle is a friend of former President Donald Trump, Rivarde said. Chris Christie did not return messages left Friday at two telephone numbers associated with him.

Seven deputies were needed to handcuff Epstein to a wheelchair, so that she could be moved to the airport security office, Rivarde said. She continued to shout vulgarities and try to bite deputies, he added.

They booked Epstein with six counts of battery on a police officer, three of disturbing the peace, one of resisting arrest by force and one of remaining after forbidden ...
Bain dramage
 
But true. Your freedoms are not as unlimited as you claim.

I never maid that claim, now you resort to lying.

Those that operate in actual truth, facts, and thinking who are not racist and a white supremacist don’t seem to get blocked.

So no actual relevance of any sort.... got it.
You keep saying all you are saying is true, however we all kinds of evidence to the contrary.

Your fantasies and delusions, don't have anything to do with what I've said.
 
Hmmm is that what DJT did? Boxes of them! Then claimed they were all gone. And then they werent.

HRC didn’t do anything like that , but since you can’t even give the details that you claim… no reason to keep talking about it.
This is an assumption on your part that an ex President "stole" classified documents while he was still President.

Meanwhile HRC was well briefed on what "originator" when it comes to classified materials meant, yet decided that when she was the "originator" that didn't matter so she kept her secret documents on a secret and unsecured server housed in someone's bathroom.
 
This is an assumption on your part that an ex President "stole" classified documents while he was still President.
Assumption? Seriously?
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/laws/1974-act.html

Nixon sealed DJTs fate.
Were the docs in Florida? Yup!

Did they belong there? Nope.

Were they DJTs to take? Nope.

Did he have his lawyers lie to say they had turned them all over? Yup.

Did the FBI find more there afterward? Yup.

Interesting to see what your version of stolen is… having something that isn’t yours, lying about it, and then being caught with them. Open and shut case. Of course you gotta cry witch hunt. But in this case it’s just a clear crime.

Those documents belong to the presidency. At 12:00pm on Jan 20th they became stolen. He brought them to Florida with intent on keeping them, that’s premeditation.

Not sure what else you need? Oh that DJT made a mistake, a slip up? Mayve instead of lying about 2020 election fraud when he knew he lost and instead work on packing and -gasp- following the rules.
Meanwhile HRC was well briefed on what "originator" when it comes to classified materials meant, yet decided that when she was the "originator" that didn't matter so she kept her secret documents on a secret and unsecured server housed in someone's bathroom.
Gotcha, so please do tell us all more.

Here’s the transcript if you want to check it.

Chairman Chaffetz.
Did you--you're just not able to prosecute it, or did Hillary Clinton break the law?

Mr. Comey.
Well, I don't want to give an overly lawyerly answer, but the question I always look at is, is there evidence that would establish beyond a reasonable doubt that somebody engaged in conduct that violated a criminal statute? And my judgment here is there is not.

There was a Republican DOJ with AG Sessions, they could have done something. Jeff wouldn’t and DJT fired him. (Well he resigned). The replacement couldn’t find a case either. There is the rule of law and then there is what you MAGA folks believe.

But who needs facts when you are bringing a case right?
 
Assumption? Seriously?
https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries/laws/1974-act.html

Nixon sealed DJTs fate.
Were the docs in Florida? Yup!

Did they belong there? Nope.

Were they DJTs to take? Nope.

Did he have his lawyers lie to say they had turned them all over? Yup.

Did the FBI find more there afterward? Yup.

Interesting to see what your version of stolen is… having something that isn’t yours, lying about it, and then being caught with them. Open and shut case. Of course you gotta cry witch hunt. But in this case it’s just a clear crime.

It's 100% ok when Hillary did it, why should I give any fucks that Trump did??

Going after him right after letting Hillary slide for the same shit just proves how corrupt the FBI and DOJ is, who they actually work for.

There was a Republican DOJ

No, it was the Obama DOJ/FBI.....there was a Republican administration in the WH, not the same thing.
 
It's 100% ok when Hillary did it, why should I give any fucks that Trump did??
The two things aren’t even close to the same thing.
Going after him right after letting Hillary slide for the same shit just proves how corrupt the FBI and DOJ is, who they actually work for.
Because you disagree doesn’t mean it’s corrupt. Well I guess to you MAGA folks it does.
No, it was the Obama DOJ/FBI.....there was a Republican administration in the WH, not the same thing.
Are you sure you aren’t on some medication?
 
The two things aren’t even close to the same thing.

Yea, she wasn't even POTUS.

But otherwise stealing classified documents is stealing classified documents. The ONLY reason you're ok with Hillary doing it is because she has a (D) next to her name and CNN has told you that makes her above the law.

And you buy it.

Because you disagree doesn’t mean it’s corrupt.

Didn't say it did. It's because they only enforce the law one direction that they are corrupt.

Well I guess to you MAGA folks it does.

Just anyone who's not delusional enough to think it's perfectly fair and balanced to give only Democrats a pass on their felonious criminal activities while ALWAYS throwing the book at anyone who's not an important/rich/powerful democrat.

Are you sure you aren’t on some medication?

Yup.... your pretending to be a psychiatrist to avoid reality notwithstanding of course.
 
Yea, she wasn't even POTUS.
And as DJT is finding out, and so is that judge in Florida, rules are for everyone including POTUS.
But otherwise stealing classified documents is stealing classified documents. The ONLY reason you're ok with Hillary doing it is because she has a (D) next to her name and CNN has told you that makes her above the law.
How did she steal them again? She followed the department policy.

DJT just boxed it up and then took it, lied, and look- they found even more.
And you buy it.
I buy facts. Facts are always good. Not delusional randomness.
Didn't say it did. It's because they only enforce the law one direction that they are corrupt.
When there is a crime the other direction that has sufficient evidence and not some need for there to be some balance in convictions on both sides.


Just anyone who's not delusional enough to think it's perfectly fair and balanced to give only Democrats a pass on their felonious criminal activities while ALWAYS throwing the book at anyone who's not an important/rich/powerful democrat.
There was an investigation. It didn’t have the results you wanted. You are sad, just like DJT. So then the lies begin to make yourself and others feel better.
Yup.... your pretending to be a psychiatrist to avoid reality notwithstanding of course.
Oh you took lots of psych classes too in your UC school. What classes didn’t you take there? Your opinions are all the authority on everything, despite not having any facts backing you up.
 
And as DJT is finding out, and so is that judge in Florida, rules are for everyone including POTUS.


But not Hillary, and that's the problem.

There was an investigation. It didn’t have the results you wanted

Actually it did, the FBI came out and point blank said she committed the crime.

But there would be no prosecution recommendation and the Clintons friend the AG dropped it because Clinton!!

Boom...above the law, bias, gestapo scum.... your kind of people.
 
But not Hillary, and that's the problem.
And the facts were all there? Please oh great legal scholar do lay them out for us.
Actually it did, the FBI came out and point blank said she committed the crime.
Yeah, I saw they said there wasn’t enough evidence. Or just some random person who said they were in the FBI who supports your story. Do you have a girlfriend in Canada too??
But there would be no prosecution recommendation and the Clintons friend the AG dropped it because Clinton!!
Which AG again? Please tell us.
Boom...above the law, bias, gestapo scum.... your kind of people.
You just keeping saying it doesn’t make it true. Only gestapo like things happening are your MAGA folks, trying to line up supporters for your cause with intimidation.
 
Yeah, I saw they said there wasn’t enough evidence.

Actually, what they said was that there was evidence of a crime but that they didn't believe they could get a conviction.

That's not "wasn't enough evidence" like you claim so it would be a lot better if you just stopped lying because the only people buying it are you and your puppet master.
 
What's this false shit about Hilary Clinton stealing classified documents? She didn't steal any classified documents.
 
Actually, what they said was that there was evidence of a crime but that they didn't believe they could get a conviction.

That's not "wasn't enough evidence" like you claim so it would be a lot better if you just stopped lying because the only people buying it are you and your puppet master.
And if they legitimately did, they would take it to court anyway. Guess the Republican AG didn’t think DJT had put enough conservative judges in key places yet. Could have brought the case later, and didn’t. So there was no case.

Unlike the crimes DJT did just with the boxes of docs alone. Seems this administration is winning with the DJT appointed judges too.

Makes you a little sad, when one wasn’t a case and this one is. Facts are killer.
 
And if they legitimately did, they would take it to court anyway. Guess the Republican AG didn’t think DJT had put enough conservative judges in key places yet. Could have brought the case later, and didn’t. So there was no case.

Unlike the crimes DJT did just with the boxes of docs alone. Seems this administration is winning with the DJT appointed judges too.

Makes you a little sad, when one wasn’t a case and this one is. Facts are killer.
dudly you are SOOO dam ignorant all you can do is spout your bullshit and get your ass hammered in return.

And you somehow think you're "winning" points with this losing style. Seriously... :rolleyes:
 
dudly you are SOOO dam ignorant all you can do is spout your bullshit and get your ass hammered in return.

And you somehow think you're "winning" points with this losing style. Seriously... :rolleyes:
I do so enjoy as your MAGA group likes to claim people are ignorant and provide no structure for that argument.

Your say so as to the veracity of my arguments is hardly the form of a legitimate arbiter.

Yours is one that continues to argue election fraud and that Jan 6 was not a coup attempt. So if you want to be serious about anything, start there. If not, then please don’t suppose to think that your evaluation of any position will be met with any sincerity.

But yeah, as always, thanks for the opportunity.
 
And the facts were all there? Please oh great legal scholar do lay them out for us.

That's what the FBI said, take it up with them.

Yeah, I saw they said there wasn’t enough evidence.

That is NOT what Comey said.

Comey said....

"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."

https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-rele...-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system


Anyone else would be in bigly deep shit, but they're letting Clinton go because..... Clinton.

Which AG again? Please tell us.
Loretta Lynch, the one who had the private tarmac meeting with Clinton just before deciding not to prosecute because... Clinton. .

You just keeping saying it doesn’t make it true.

No, the fact that it happened, the corruption was well documented and the FBI admitted their bias publicly.... does make it true.

Only gestapo like things happening are your MAGA folks,

No, that is the opposite of objective reality. Put the crack pipe down.

trying to line up supporters for your cause with intimidation.

You're still making shit up.
 
Back
Top