Sandia
Very Experienced
- Joined
- May 24, 2002
- Posts
- 6,461
"[A] strategic doctrine, if it is to be valid... must be reciprocal...
The doctrine of pre-emptive self-defense, which is the right of one country to attack an adversary based on a subjective evaluation of capability and intent, fails this test. We, in the US, cannot admit that it imparts an equal right to Iraq...
Put another way, the doctrine of pre-emptive self-defense appears logically to imply another, subsidiary doctrine -- that of a Chosen People..." James Galbraith.
Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Austin: "Over-reliance on packing the biggest gun or having the fastest draw does not make us safer; rather, it is a formula for international anarchy."
Yesterday on Fresh Air, they interviewed the former head of the Counter-Terrorism agency under Clinton. Among other things, he said there was enormous pressure on people in the intelligence community to conform to Bush's agenda on Iraq.
In today's newspaper:
"A letter from CIA Director George Tenet to Congress has brought into public view divisions... about what intelligence shows about Iraq's intentions...
The agency argued that Iraq would refrain from sponsoring terrorists attacks for the foreseeable future if the US did not attack..."
Michael Gordon
The New York Times.
The doctrine of pre-emptive self-defense, which is the right of one country to attack an adversary based on a subjective evaluation of capability and intent, fails this test. We, in the US, cannot admit that it imparts an equal right to Iraq...
Put another way, the doctrine of pre-emptive self-defense appears logically to imply another, subsidiary doctrine -- that of a Chosen People..." James Galbraith.
Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Austin: "Over-reliance on packing the biggest gun or having the fastest draw does not make us safer; rather, it is a formula for international anarchy."
Yesterday on Fresh Air, they interviewed the former head of the Counter-Terrorism agency under Clinton. Among other things, he said there was enormous pressure on people in the intelligence community to conform to Bush's agenda on Iraq.
In today's newspaper:
"A letter from CIA Director George Tenet to Congress has brought into public view divisions... about what intelligence shows about Iraq's intentions...
The agency argued that Iraq would refrain from sponsoring terrorists attacks for the foreseeable future if the US did not attack..."
Michael Gordon
The New York Times.