pp_man - I am very disappointed in you

SexyChele

Lovin' Life
Joined
Apr 24, 2001
Posts
6,099
Never before have I been sent on such a wild goose chase when I have sincerely asked for information as you have sent me on these past few weeks. A while ago, I asked for information on how to reach or find out information on “Jews for Justice in the Middle East”, the publishers of the document you keep quoting from, “The Origin of the Palestine-Israel Conflict.” My request was sincere – I truly did want to learn more about where this organization was coming from. I was at a loss as to who or what this organization was, as I could find absolutely no information on them.

When you sent me the link stating it was to their web page, I thought I would finally be able to thoroughly research this group. The link, rather than lead me to any “home page” of “Jews for Justice in the Middle East”, instead lead me to the personal web page of an American Christian couple living in the American Northeast who have a heavy bias/slant towards Palestine. Nothing on their web page is presented with balance or objectivity. It is simply their own personal stance, and nothing more. Yes, they do have a link to the document you keep purporting as truth. And in the document, where it states you can email the publishers, the address is to the founder of this personal website – not to any official organization.

I did read roughly 70% of their webpage – and found it to be biased, unbalanced, and slanted. That is not a problem. Everyone has a right to their opinion. But that is all it is – their opinion, along with some articles that only support their own viewpoint. Hardly a page worthy of citing as a valid source. Besides, this is a personal web page, and nothing more. I can do the same thing, should I choose. But it would still be my own personal web page, with my own opinions. If one agreed with me, then they would speak highly of it. If one disagreed, it would dismissed.

So far to date, I have searched the internet extensively for any word as to who the “Jews for Justice in the Middle East” is/are to no avail. I have searched through the resources at the local library. I have asked 3 rabbis. I have checked with my local Jewish Community Center. No one has heard of this group. Now, in all fairness, I have 2 last resources I am in the midst of contacting, and perhaps may receive an answer from one of these. But it ain’t lookin’ good.

When you stated that you could not find the Palestinian Charter, Cheyenne posted a link. You disputed that link because it was from a Jewish source. I located a link from a Palestinian source, and you summarily dismissed the whole document. (Yes, it is a notice of intent – notice of intent to get rid of Israel, as anyone can read for themselves) The point here is that when you asked for information, you received the information you requested. When you doubted the validity of that source, you were provided with one that would be more to your liking. Why are you not able to provide me with the same courtesy? Do you simply and blindly accept this document, “The Origin of the Palestine-Israel Conflict”, so easily because it fits in with your own personal opinion? Do you not research the source of any documentation presented to you? Somehow, I had given you more credit than merely accepting something on face value alone.

Now, why am I writing this on the board and not in a PM? Simple. Unless one of the last 2 remaining sources gives me some valid information, I must state that I believe the document you keep trotting out as absolute truth cannot be accepted as valid in any way other than personal opinion. The source for this document cannot be proved in any way as being a source of legitimate facts/research. As the PO address is in Berkeley, California, (and, yes, I do presume to write a letter to them at that address) I can easily assume this document has been created by a couple of college kids passing themselves off as a “group”. I simply do not know. And, so far, no reliable source is aware of who this “group” is, where they are from, what they believe, what they stand for.

Therefore, anytime you casually present this document to unsuspecting individuals here on the board, you can believe that I will follow it up with a disclaimer that the group who has “published” such document is an unreliable source of information, thereby placing the document’s validity into question.

Maybe next time, you can present truly valid, truly objective, truly provable sources for your information. I am very disappointed in you, ppman. I had expected more from you than this.
 
SexyChele said:
Never before have I been sent on such a wild goose chase when I have sincerely asked for information as you have sent me on these past few weeks. A while ago, I asked for information on how to reach or find out information on “Jews for Justice in the Middle East”, the publishers of the document you keep quoting from, “The Origin of the Palestine-Israel Conflict.” My request was sincere – I truly did want to learn more about where this organization was coming from. I was at a loss as to who or what this organization was, as I could find absolutely no information on them.

When you sent me the link stating it was to their web page, I thought I would finally be able to thoroughly research this group. The link, rather than lead me to any “home page” of “Jews for Justice in the Middle East”, instead lead me to the personal web page of an American Christian couple living in the American Northeast who have a heavy bias/slant towards Palestine. Nothing on their web page is presented with balance or objectivity. It is simply their own personal stance, and nothing more. Yes, they do have a link to the document you keep purporting as truth. And in the document, where it states you can email the publishers, the address is to the founder of this personal website – not to any official organization.

I did read roughly 70% of their webpage – and found it to be biased, unbalanced, and slanted. That is not a problem. Everyone has a right to their opinion. But that is all it is – their opinion, along with some articles that only support their own viewpoint. Hardly a page worthy of citing as a valid source. Besides, this is a personal web page, and nothing more. I can do the same thing, should I choose. But it would still be my own personal web page, with my own opinions. If one agreed with me, then they would speak highly of it. If one disagreed, it would dismissed.

So far to date, I have searched the internet extensively for any word as to who the “Jews for Justice in the Middle East” is/are to no avail. I have searched through the resources at the local library. I have asked 3 rabbis. I have checked with my local Jewish Community Center. No one has heard of this group. Now, in all fairness, I have 2 last resources I am in the midst of contacting, and perhaps may receive an answer from one of these. But it ain’t lookin’ good.

When you stated that you could not find the Palestinian Charter, Cheyenne posted a link. You disputed that link because it was from a Jewish source. I located a link from a Palestinian source, and you summarily dismissed the whole document. (Yes, it is a notice of intent – notice of intent to get rid of Israel, as anyone can read for themselves) The point here is that when you asked for information, you received the information you requested. When you doubted the validity of that source, you were provided with one that would be more to your liking. Why are you not able to provide me with the same courtesy? Do you simply and blindly accept this document, “The Origin of the Palestine-Israel Conflict”, so easily because it fits in with your own personal opinion? Do you not research the source of any documentation presented to you? Somehow, I had given you more credit than merely accepting something on face value alone.

Now, why am I writing this on the board and not in a PM? Simple. Unless one of the last 2 remaining sources gives me some valid information, I must state that I believe the document you keep trotting out as absolute truth cannot be accepted as valid in any way other than personal opinion. The source for this document cannot be proved in any way as being a source of legitimate facts/research. As the PO address is in Berkeley, California, (and, yes, I do presume to write a letter to them at that address) I can easily assume this document has been created by a couple of college kids passing themselves off as a “group”. I simply do not know. And, so far, no reliable source is aware of who this “group” is, where they are from, what they believe, what they stand for.

Therefore, anytime you casually present this document to unsuspecting individuals here on the board, you can believe that I will follow it up with a disclaimer that the group who has “published” such document is an unreliable source of information, thereby placing the document’s validity into question.

Maybe next time, you can present truly valid, truly objective, truly provable sources for your information. I am very disappointed in you, ppman. I had expected more from you than this.

OK! OK! I didn't realise that I had sent you on a wild goose chase. I apologise for that.

I sometimes use the document "The Origins of the Palestine-Israel Conflict" because it's easy to absorb. I haven't checked out the group itself and as you say they may be a bunch of students. But what they have to say is repeated in other source material I use. So kids or not the “Jews for Justice in the Middle East” are at least making an effort. Unless your going to claim that all source material originating from Jewish groups who give the Palestine point of view, as fakes.

And they are not afraid to be counted as when one of their contributers was challenged they published both the challenger's and the challenged e-mail exchange. That is, I suppose, if we don't think they're making it all up.

Anyway I'm not here to defend them just to quote them when appropriate. Here are some other sources that I use.

http://www.cactus48.com/truth.html

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/7891/index_zion1.html

http://www.thestruggle.org/Newspapers.html

http://www.ariga.com/peacewatch/

http://www.arab.net/palestine/geography/pe_jordanriver.html

http://www.cactus48.com/index.html

http://www.ariga.com/peacewatch/iscyber.htm

Maybe you can tell me whether they're a load of humbug as well.

Incidentally I find it extremely coincidental that you should start this thread, and such a long one as well, just after Ishmael and myself were having an argument about source material on another thread.

Trying to do a hatchet job SexyChele?

ppman
 
Another example of the right-wingers' character assassination of anyone who dares to stand up to them.
 
Another perfect example of two dimwits (with no credibility) in one thread.
 
Re: Re: pp_man - I am very disappointed in you

p_p_man said:

Incidentally I find it extremely coincidental that you should start this thread, and such a long one as well, just after Ishmael and myself were having an argument about source material on another thread.

Trying to do a hatchet job SexyChele?



No, no "hatchet job" here. I saw the thread earlier, but have not been keeping up with it. I was going to do this as a response in PM, but felt others should be well aware of what you are passing off as a valid source.

I had started composting this thread last night, and finished this morning. Only after I had posted, did I notice there was some ruckus on the other thread. Had I known that, I would have posted this information there, and spared the board another post that most people aren't interested in.

And before I go off for another go round on research, have you at least checked the validity of the sources for these links? Or must I begin at square one?
 
Re: Re: pp_man - I am very disappointed in you

http://www.cactus48.com/truth.htmlIffy

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/7891/index_zion1.html Bad source

http://www.thestruggle.org/Newspapers.html Bad source

http://www.ariga.com/peacewatch/

http://www.arab.net/palestine/geography/pe_jordanriver.html Bad source

http://www.cactus48.com/index.htmlIffy

http://www.ariga.com/peacewatch/iscyber.htm


Any source from geocities or one of its ilk is not a credible source. This information has no standard of verification.

Any source from arab.net is not a credible source any more than one from israel.org is. They're incredibly biased.

Ariga looks okay. I didn't read it.

Cactus looks iffy based on the fact that you cannot find credentials of the domain owners without playing hide and seek, if at all.
 
Re: Re: Re: pp_man - I am very disappointed in you

SexyChele said:
And before I go off for another go round on research, have you at least checked the validity of the sources for these links? Or must I begin at square one?

It's not the validity of the source you should be interested in, but the validity of what's being said. Checks through any number of sources, valid or not, will usually show the information on any given subject to be similar as it should be. Different slants on the same thing of course depending what side the originating source is favouring, but similar for all that.

Now if you come back after a search with sources of your own giving information in direct contrast to what I'm saying then we're getting somewhere.

But if you want to track down source validity, go right ahead, though I can't see what it will really achieve.

Unless you're going to proclaim that because the source is not all what it claims to be then the information therein must also be suspect.

Now we both know that's not necessarily true...

ppman
 
Last edited:
Re: Re: Re: Re: pp_man - I am very disappointed in you

p_p_man said:


It's not the validity of the source you should be interested in, but the validity of what's being said.

I'm waiting to see what Marxist says to this one. And a few other people on the board...
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: pp_man - I am very disappointed in you

p_p_man said:


It's not the validity of the source you should be interested in, but the validity of what's being said. Checks through any number of sources, valid or not, will usually show the information on any given subject to be similar as it should be. Different slants on the same thing of course depending what side the originating source is favouring, but similar for all that.

Now if you come back after a search with sources of your own giving information in direct contrast to what I'm saying then we're getting somewhere.

But if you want to track down source validity, go right ahead, though I can't see what it will really achieve.

Unless you're going to proclaim that because the source is not all what it claims to be then the information therein must also be suspect.

Now we both know that's not necessarily true...

ppman



This is my take:

You go out and find a bunch of sources that qualify your argument. I go and find a bunch of sources that qualify my argument. Both of our sources are slanted to the way we believe. I discount your sources, and you discount mine. In the meantime, nothing is accomplished.

That is why I think the validity of the source is important. I will normally not use a quote from the Jerusalem Post to prove a point, as I know it is slanted towards the Israeli way of thinking. It's obvious and easily cut down as an unobjective source of information. I accept that, and if I use the Post to state something, I acknowledge its bias. Does that mean that every word published by the Jerusalem Post is inaccurate? No. Most of their articles can be substantiated by other periodicals and newspapers. But if I'm directing my quotes to some one who does not believe the Post is an accurate source of information, then I would be foolish to continue to try to convince some one of my argument knowing they do not accept it as valid.

As to targeting the group I did, it was for a number of reasons. 1. You use the document this group has put out many times, without stating that they are heavily slanted to one position only. (I really do believe that you think having the word "Jews" is going to make it seem more palpable to those who disagree with you) 2. I have a great deal of interest in the Mid East, and am familiar with most of the peace-seeking groups, both in the U.S. and Israel. This is one I had never heard of before. 3. As I dug into this group on my own, I found nothing. I've also found out that they only Jewish group who has ever heard of these people is the Anti-Defamation League. (Who refuses to share an opinion one way or the other, at least with me)

So, if I bring forth all sorts of sources that you discount as "Jewish propaganda", and I discount your sources as "Arab propadanda", then we are not accomplishing anything. Unless absolutely objective material can be used, it is an "battle" that is destined to go on forever.
 
Incidentally I find it extremely coincidental that you should start this thread, and such a long one as well, just after Ishmael and myself were having an argument about source material on another thread.

Trying to do a hatchet job SexyChele?

That is the essence of ppman.

He gets busted, then drops little turds of suspicion about a conspiracy against him.

What a loser.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: pp_man - I am very disappointed in you

SexyChele said:
I have a great deal of interest in the Mid East, and am familiar with most of the peace-seeking groups, both in the U.S. and Israel. This is one I had never heard of before. 3. As I dug into this group on my own, I found nothing. I've also found out that they only Jewish group who has ever heard of these people is the Anti-Defamation League. (Who refuses to share an opinion one way or the other, at least with me)

OK scrub what I just said (just? 6 hours or so ago). Like you, I want to learn as well.

So post here what the Jewish groups that you know about are saying about the situation. As you've already said that you discount quotes from the Jewish Chronicle as they would probably be slanted too much one way I trust you to find sources that do not have a slant in any direction.

ppman
 
Back
Top