PhaonsBrother
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2009
- Posts
- 160
We've been post -agriworld for quite some time now. The "thinness" of the veneer of culture is very much up for debate. Most hunter-gatherer societies today live in social structures completely fucked over from whatever they were by a postindustrial and postcolonial world - but when you find neolithic man do let us know how we're doing it wrong, because the success of his social structures has brought the industrial world to its knees - oh, wait.
The major feature of homo sapiens is this giant frontal grey stuff which does these amazing
external adaptations every year or so, like ipods and twitter and a slightly different gear box on this year's Audi and sexting. You are typing into a thing that has revolutionized sexuality for a large chunk of the world.
Sweetheart-on-a-highfalutin-tart, we live within the confines of the Neolithic Revolution, the first agricultural revolution and settlements that became Jericho, Damascus, Byblos etc. The social structures were formed within this transition and have changed very little. Romantic love has nothing to do with the way the rest of the world forms marriages and up until about the 20th Century had nothing to do with the way English speakers paired off. There's little reason to doubt that Neolithic man paired off into something similar to what's considered a household today in Lebanon or Jordan or Mexico. Industry didn't change marriage, it created smaller households.
The reason social anthropology and archaeology have the veneer of a science is because there exists many hunter-gatherer societies today with social structures and technologies that have changed very little in the past 8000-10000 years. Because these societies and artifacts exist we can paint a picture of the world pre-industry, pre-feudal, pre-city, pre-agriculture.