Phoenix To Recruit Minority Lifeguards Even If They Can’t Swim…

The Disease is NOT just in the Phoenix Swimming Pools


DIVERSITY AND INTELLECTUAL DECLINE AT BOWDOIN:



The Klingenstein report nicely captures the illiberal or fallacious aspects of this campus doctrine, but the paper’s true contribution is in recording some of its absurd manifestations at Bowdoin. For example, the college has “no curricular requirements that center on the American founding or the history of the nation.” Even history majors aren’t required to take a single course in American history. In the History Department, no course is devoted to American political, military, diplomatic or intellectual history—the only ones available are organized around some aspect of race, class, gender or sexuality.

One of the few requirements is that Bowdoin students take a yearlong freshman seminar. Some of the 37 seminars offered this year: “Affirmative Action and U.S. Society,” “Fictions of Freedom,” “Racism,” “Queer Gardens” (which “examines the work of gay and lesbian gardeners and traces how marginal identities find expression in specific garden spaces”), “Sexual Life of Colonialism” and “Modern Western Prostitutes.”

Regarding Bowdoin professors, the report estimates that “four or five out of approximately 182 full-time faculty members might be described as politically conservative.” In the 2012 election cycle, 100% of faculty donations went to President Obama.


Sounds like a diversity problem to me. My advice to potential students: Don’t borrow money to go there.


Hey, at least they have a buncha CUNT STUDIES shit.....the kids will get BIG $$$ jobs when they graduate
 
The first quote describes AA, and how it quickly became quotas ordered by government bureaucrats or courts, just as I said and contrary to your Post 91. This has decreased, but it still exists. The second quote describes how the U. of Texas uses race in determining who gets admitted. :eek: This is contrary to your comment that colleges do not use such methods.

BTW, Sioux City is in Iowa.


You're misreading. The first article (Wiki) just describes the notion of racial quotas in general. Then it says this:

In 1978, the Supreme Court ruled in Bakke v. Regents that public universities (and other government institutions) could not set specific numerical targets based on race for admissions or employment.[1]

The second quote about U of Texas doesn't have anything do do with racial quotas either. And the article follows exactly what I'm saying and contradicts my statements in no way at all. In fact I could have submitted this article as evidence of my point.
 
Here is something more recent, and I could probably find hundreds more examples if I wanted to take the time:

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/fed...sponding-minorities-who-failed-entrance-exams

Here is another on the same subject: http://news.investors.com/ibd-edito...erez-at-labor-would-enforce-hiring-quotas.htm


These aren't examples at all. In fact the investors.com article is just an op-ed.

-The CNS article cites a case where the employer was found to be guilty of discriminatiory hiring practices. They were nailed for using an applicant test where many of the questions screened out minorities by asking bogus questions that had nothing to do with the job:
In United States v. City of New York, Judge Garaufis found: (1) that the City’s use of two written examinations screened out black and Hispanic applicants at a significantly higher rate than white applicants; and (2) that the City’s use of these examinations did not predict which applicants would be best able to perform the job, which means that the use of these examinations was not job-related and consistent with business necessity. As a result, the Court found the City liable for disparate impact discrimination under Title VII.

So the result was that a judge awarded cash damages to those wrongly discriminated against. And this is why CNS is a massive shitstain of a media source: they're lying about the quota. It doesn't exist. They're carrying on all this bullshit meant to stoke racial fears in white people about blacks and hispanics taking their jobs but that's not what happened. According to the judge's ruling which you can read right here, the court order against the guilty employer is to:

1) go back to the applicants who failed the discriminatory exam
2) give them the new version of the exam which is not discriminatory
3) IF they pass it then give them limited priority in the hiring process

That's completely different than courts pushing racial quotas just for the sake of it.
 
Last edited:
You should stop

WE ALL KNOW THE TRUTH

Those that you are trying to educate, care not for it


If Boxlicker was correct he would have shown us the racial quota law by now. But despite his imagination no such law exists. And until he can come up with said imaginary law he's just going to keep posting bogus links from right-wing sources who are lying.
 
Back
Top