Pete Hegseth, Secretary of Defense

Oh well, at least we can always rely on Democrats to make idiots of themselves. The only real concern is they also believe themselves

1736885595322.png 1736885540221.png
 
The first Sec of Defense who's actually for for purpose in a couple of decades. Hegseth knows what it's all about and what's needed

Not to be confused with a jack off, which is what Senator Reed is.

1736887156563.png
 
The question continues to be - will Republicans support Hegseth. Democrat's questions today did not change that.
 
My point is that I think it's a dumb name.

As is Cannon and Moon Unit and Dweezle - you including those other dumb names indicate that you're in agreement.

^apparently thinks he can dictate to parents what names are "acceptable."
 
^apparently thinks he can dictate to parents what names are "acceptable."
Why would I dictate what names are acceptable.?..they can name their kid whatever the fuck they want. Naming him "Gunner" just means he'll be ridiculed for most of his childhood. And likely will be a punching bag for the 6 other kids they have.

It's a stupid name...just as Cannon or Dweezil or Sunflower or Gertrude.
 
Seeing Arab and Muslim Americans celebrate a potential ceasefire in Gaza as proof they were right to back Trump. Meanwhile, Trump's new head of the United States military:

1000018129.jpg

War all the time.
 
Seeing Arab and Muslim Americans celebrate a potential ceasefire in Gaza as proof they were right to back Trump. Meanwhile, Trump's new head of the United States military:

View attachment 2467568

War all the time.


It's only war "all the time" if you give the other team more time to play. Kick their asses absolutely off the battlefield to the point the enemy cannot continue to "bring it" and it's a completely different story called Defeat and Subjugation.

I support this concept.
 
It's the Senate.....most won't be up in the next election.

Ahh, right. The election where they're not going to be primaried because they're not up for reelection.

Meanwhile, back in reality, the "next election" where they ARE up for reelection is going to be fun when those who don't vote to confirm Hegseth will have to face a primary challenger.

See what I did there?
 
Ahh, right. The election where they're not going to be primaried because they're not up for reelection.

Meanwhile, back in reality, the "next election" where they ARE up for reelection is going to be fun when those who don't vote to confirm Hegseth will have to face a primary challenger.

See what I did there?
Lol ....you keep threatening your primary threats...see how that works out for ya.

meanwhile, Hegseth may not have the votes to be confirmed. And by the next election, Republicans may not have both chambers.

The margin is close now, not during the next election.
 
Lol ....you keep threatening your primary threats...see how that works out for ya.

meanwhile, Hegseth may not have the votes to be confirmed. And by the next election, Republicans may not have both chambers.

The margin is close now, not during the next election.

Sure, you can believe that. What are you going to do if your beliefs turn out to be wrong? Cry? Post nonsense on Lit that somehow it's BB's fault that you couldn't see the truth that was right in front of your eyes?

Really?

OTOH, if you're right, then MY BELIEF in the legal process and the law wins.

<-- winner either way.

You, not so much.
 
Back
Top