Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
sweetnpetite said:Could he be any more of an ass?
How do people like this get away with calling themselves Christain? it's appaling.
SeaCat said:Sweet,
The problem lies not with Mr. Robertson and his ilk. It lies with the people, of whom there are way too many, who do not, can not and refuse to think. They prefer others to do their thinking for them and follow the person or orginisation with the loudest voice.
Idiots like Mr. Robertson often have the loudest voices and therefore have the most followers. The bible has several comments about people like this. It is unfortunate that people like him forget to read the bible as a whole and just take what they want, what is convenient for their personal beliefs from it. Maybe this is why I don't believe in organised religeon.
Cat
sweetnpetite said:But people do take him seiously, that's the problem.
I think he meets with GWB as well.
CopyCarver said:Pat Robertson announced today that he’s convinced George W. Bush to change the US Government’s emblem from an eagle to a condom because it more accurately reflects the Bush Administration’s political stance.
A condom allows for inflation, halts production, destroys the next generation, protects a bunch of pricks, and gives you a sense of security while you're actually being screwed.
Colleen Thomas said:It's deeper than that. The vast majority of his followers have never cracked a bible unless instructed to. Tell them to open their bibles to judges and give them a verse to read and they do. And they take the verse literally. Ask them what a judge is, and they are lost. Roberston and his ilk surivie on a lack of contextural knowledge among their flocks.
Mossaic law, as provided in Deuternomomy and Leviticus, is draconian. It lacks any kind of compassion and is inflexible. It's also contravened in many cases directly, by the teachings of Jesus. But if you don't understand the context, jesus seems to be speaking into the air.
the biggest failing of most of his followers isn't that they are your run of the mill imbecile. Or that they are too lazy to think for themselves. It's that they have no appreciation of the context of their holy book. And the Robertson's of the world make out like bandits because they can selective quote scripture to support just about any far fetched idea that comes to their heads.
I used to take Genesis, you know, the creation parts of Genesis, the way i would any creation myth. Raven capturing the sun, Bifrost and whatnot, the Titans and the gods-- every creation story has a lesson for us, an aspect to consider out of all the myriad aspects of Life.
mcopado said:But it is the same, only our culture seems to think that it dropped onto our laps set in stone an un edited...Funny how the religuous right uses the king James version---The most highly edited of all and calls that Literal. LOL
I did a thesis on many of the creations stories, and the all tell the same story, The creation and the fall.
cantdog said:I used to take Genesis, you know, the creation parts of Genesis, the way i would any creation myth. Raven capturing the sun, Bifrost and whatnot, the Titans and the gods-- every creation story has a lesson for us, an aspect to consider out of all the myriad aspects of Life.
But it seems to be different with Genesis. Because people take it literally. Not as a myth, but word-for-word. So, alright, okay-- literally, then.
I wantcha to take note that Mankind is created twice in Genesis. Once, by 'Elohim": Male and female he created them.. and once, by 'Yahweh': the one where the dude is formed outta clay and breath, the dude gives birth via his extracted rib to Woman, and the whole serpent and garden scene, quite some time further on in the Genesis book as a whole...

mcopado said:Great post Colleen,
It reminds me of this Poem, that I am oneday going to use as part of a Metaphysical Christmas Service,
God is Born
D. H. Lawrence
The history of the cosmos
is the history of the struggle of becoming.
When the dim flux of unformed life
struggled, convulsed back and forth upon itself,
and broke at last into light and dark
came into existence as light,
came into existence as cold shadow
then every atom of the comsos trembled with delight.
Behold, God is born!
He is bright light!
He is pitch dark and cold!
And in the great struggle of intangible chaos
when, at a certain point, a drop of water
began to drip downwards
and a breath of vapour began to wreathe up
Lo again the shudder of bliss through all the atoms!
Oh, God is born!
Behold, He is born wet!
Look, He hath movement upward! He spirals!
And so, in the great aeons of accomplishment and debacle
from time to time the wild crying of every electron:
Lo! God is born!
When sapphires cooled out of molten chaos:
See, God is born! He is blue, he is deep blue,
he is forever blue!
When gold lay shining threading the cooled-off rock:
God is born! God is born! bright yellow and ductile
He is born.
When the little eggy amoeba emerged out of foam and nowhere
then all the electrons held their breath:
Ach! Ach! Now indeed God is born! He twinkles within.
When from a world of mosses and of ferns
at last the narcissus lifted a tuft of five-point stars
and dangled them in the atmosphere,
then every molecule of creation jumped and clapped its hands:
God is born! God is born perfumed and dangling and with a little cup!
Throughout the aeons, as the lizard swirls his tail finer than water,
as the peacock turns to the sun, and could not be more splendid,
as the leopard smites the small calf with a spangled paw, perfect.
the universe trembles: God is born! God is here!
And when at last man stood on two legs and wondered,
then there was a hush of suspense at the core of every electron:
Behold, now very God is born!
God Himself is born!
And so we see, God is not
until he is born.
And also we see
there is no end to the birth of God.
***
By the way great AV, is it you?![]()
cantdog said:If you insist on literalism, you have to go along with me about the Other People. Otherwise, Cain's kids were all children of incest, and so were any other descendents of Adam and Eve. The casual references to moving off out east to live make little sense otherwise.
woodnymph_O said:I agree the stories of evelotion are numerous, and really don't vary alot from culture to culture, just the names change.

Sweetie, my college Religion Professor (A PhD in Comparative Religion and a Minister), claimed there were 4 creation stories in the first 5 books. (And that didn't include my personal favorite: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.(I told a christian friend of mine that the bible has 2 creation stories that are different and she didn't believe me.)