OBAMA TO NAME THOMAS PEREZ FOR LABOR SECRETARY. I expect he’ll get a lot of questions about the racialist dysfunction in his department at DOJ identified by the Inspector General recently.
om Perez: What You Need To Know About the Most Radical Cabinet Nominee
March 18th, 2013 - 7:51 am
Email
Print
Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size
Today, President Obama issues a challenge to Republican Senators: in nominating Tom Perez as Labor secretary, he implies that Senate Republicans don’t have either the guts or organizational skill to stop what would become perhaps the most radical left-wing cabinet member in history.
Whether the president is right about GOP senators remains to be seen.
As they say, I wrote the book on Tom Perez. My New York Times bestseller Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department is largely a catalog of the rancid racialism over which Perez has presided.
The New Black Panther case is one small part. But so are the eighth-grade transvestite lawsuits in New York, and so are the race quotas in New York City. PJ Media has been covering Perez in a way that no other outlet has for the last three years: his wars on peaceful Catholic pro-life protesters, his dishonesty under oath, and his overruling of career DOJ lawyers in the South Carolina Voter ID case are but three more from a long list of radical transgressions.
Make no mistake — that’s why Obama appointed him.
Obama knows power is fleeting. You have a short amount of time to affect a large amount of change. He knows Perez is an unapologetic leftist from the Hugo Chavez-wing of the Democrat Party. (Not an exaggeration: Chavez once had Citgo make a payment to Perez’s illegal alien advocacy group Casa de Maryland.)
Issa: Perez, Under Congressional Investigation, a ‘Bad Choice’
House Oversight Committee chairman Darrell Issa (R., Calif.), who has helped lead the congressional investigation against Obama labor secretary nominee Thomas Perez, expressed concerns over his nomination today.
“We’re going to make our comments on the number of areas of concern to the senators in hopes that they’ll clear up some of the obvious problems: His lack of candor in his testimony, his failure to enforce civil-rights against voter intimidation, and of course the St. Paul situation where he traded off over $180 million dollars of the taxpayers’ money for what appears to be an ideological bent,” Issa tells National Review in a brief interview this morning.
He adds that Perez is a “bad choice” to be President Obama’s nominee, considering the “concerns” he listed. “Then again,” Issa says, “I haven’t been too keen on most of his appointments.”
Democrats Play Race Card Against Republicans For Opposing Obama’s Far-Left Pick To Head Department Of Labor, Tom Perez…
We already knew this was coming.
Via Daily Caller:
Democrats are defending President Barack Obama’s provocative March 18 pick to head the Department of Labor, Tom Perez, by highlighting his Hispanic heritage.
“This morning: RNC autopsy warned GOP to improve Hispanic outreach. This afternoon: Senate Rs fight Hispanic nominee,” said a tweet from Sen. Harry Reid’s digital media advisor, Faiz Shakir.
Brad Woodhouse, the spokesman for the Democratic National Committee, broadcast a tweet from teachers’ union leader, saying “This is why GOP does so poorly with Latinos. Perez deserves better.”
That tweet was linked to a Washington Post opinion column by a progressive blogger, Greg Sargent.
“Conservatives are already signaling that they are going to tee off Perez’s record to go the lurid and racially charged route … That will create a tricky balancing act for those Republicans who agree with the RNC’s diagnosis of the need to repair relations with Latinos,” said the Post, titled “Attacks on Thomas Perez will do wonders for GOP Latino outreach.”
Keep reading…
From yesterday: Obama Nominates Radical Leftist As Next Labor Secretary, Refused To Rule Out Sharia Blasphemy Laws In America, Has Deep Ties To Soros
Boxer Says GOP Hates Minorities Because They Oppose Tom Perez Nomination… Seemingly Unaware She Opposed Miguel Estrada’s Nomination…
As always, it’s only raaaaacist when Republicans do it.
Flashback 2003:
(LA Times) — Lawyer Miguel Estrada was a well-qualified candidate to serve our judiciary system (Sept. 5). The U.S. Senate, however, for over two years refused to vote on his nomination. Our senators, whom we send to Washington to represent us and vote on our behalf, have consistently refused to vote on this nomination. I can respect a senator whom I disagree with, and who votes in ways I do not support. However, I cannot respect a senator who refuses to vote and refuses other senators the opportunity to vote.
Both California Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer have refused to fulfill their constitutional requirements to vote on this nomination. This miscarriage of justice has led Estrada to withdraw his name from consideration. This miscarriage of justice is not only an attack on Estrada but on all Americans who seek justice.