On-Line Porno

R. Richard

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 24, 2003
Posts
10,382
Online pornography to be blocked by default, PM announces
David Cameron: "In the balance between freedom and responsibility we have neglected our responsibility to children"

Most households in the UK will have pornography blocked by their internet provider unless they choose to receive it, David Cameron has announced.

In addition, the prime minister said possessing online pornography depicting rape would become illegal in England and Wales - in line with Scotland.

Mr Cameron warned in a speech that access to online pornography was "corroding childhood".

The new measures will apply to both existing and new customers.

Seven years ago David Cameron told a Google conference that politicians should encourage companies to change, not over-regulate them.

Today, he announced he had reached agreement with the four biggest ISPs on pornography filters, after some behind the scenes tussling.

But he hinted that if search engines like Google didn't agree to a blacklist of search terms, he would legislate.

From Downing St, he can supplement the art of persuasion with the smack of firm government.

Back in his opposition days, Cameron made waves presenting himself as a man on the side of parents against firms that sold chocolates at checkouts and children's bras.

If he can mould a similar image in Downing St, as a PM doing battle with big business on behalf of fellow parents, he will be more than happy.

Mr Cameron also called for some "horrific" internet search terms to be "blacklisted", meaning they would automatically bring up no results on websites such as Google or Bing.

He told the BBC he expected a "row" with service providers who, he said in his speech, were "not doing enough to take responsibility" despite having a "moral duty" to do so.

He also warned he could have to "force action" by changing the law and that, if there were "technical obstacles", firms should use their "greatest brains" to overcome them.

'Innocence'
In his speech, Mr Cameron said family-friendly filters would be automatically selected for all new customers by the end of the year - although they could choose to switch them off.

And millions of existing computer users would be contacted by their internet providers and told they must decide whether to use or not use "family-friendly filters" to restrict adult material.

The filters would apply to all devices linked to the affected home Wi-Fi network and across the public Wi-Fi network "wherever children are likely to be present".

Customers who do not click on either option - accepting or declining - will have filters activated by default, Tory MP Claire Perry, Mr Cameron's adviser on the sexualisation and commercialisation of childhood, told the BBC.

The UK's biggest internet service providers have agreed to the filters scheme meaning it should cover 95% of homes.

Other measures announced by the prime minister included:

New laws so videos streamed online in the UK will be subject to the same restrictions as those sold in shops

Search engines having until October to introduce further measures to block illegal content

Experts from the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre being given more powers to examine secretive file-sharing networks

A secure database of banned child porn images gathered by police across the country will be used to trace illegal content and the paedophiles viewing it
Mr Cameron also called for warning pages to pop up with helpline numbers when people try to search for illegal content.

He said: "I want to talk about the internet, the impact it is having on the innocence of our children, how online pornography is corroding childhood.

"And how, in the darkest corners of the internet, there are things going on that are a direct danger to our children, and that must be stamped out.

"I'm not making this speech because I want to moralise or scaremonger, but because I feel profoundly as a politician, and as a father, that the time for action has come. This is, quite simply, about how we protect our children and their innocence."

But former Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre boss Jim Gamble told BBC Radio 4's Today programme it was important to "get to the root cause" of illegal pornography, by catching those responsible for creating it.
 
I guess that means we'll get all our porno from politicians like Anthony Weiner.
 
That means the state can do a better job of look after you than you can. Baby want a Nanny? It's also about power.

Yes. Let me see if I can expand on the theme a bit. "Your all knowing, all seeing state has trained you people. However, you're now making decisions that we don't want you to make, despite our omniscient training. Thus, we must correct your path to the future that we have selected for you. You may think to rebel but, "Ve haf vays of finding out! Sieg heil!"
 
And I thought the US was becoming fascist. Gotta love the regulating morality, which, no matter their "reasoning," is all it is.
 
And I thought the US was becoming fascist. Gotta love the regulating morality, which, no matter their "reasoning," is all it is.

They can't ban porn here its the only industry still making money.

However, what they might do is realize Chinese porn stars will work cheaper and give the producers tax breaks to film over there.

Wouldn't surprise me, current Government can certainly manage to even fuck up wet dreams.
 
The pornography of which they speak is to do with kids:
Personally, I'd publicly castrate the bastards who make this kiddie-porn.


That means the state can do a better job of look after you than you can. Baby want a Nanny? It's also about power.

Nearly, but not quite.
It's more to do with "something we said we'd get round to sometime", so when it comes to an election, we'll be fed the "we did what you want" line.
:rolleyes:
 
They can't ban porn here its the only industry still making money.

However, what they might do is realize Chinese porn stars will work cheaper and give the producers tax breaks to film over there.

Wouldn't surprise me, current Government can certainly manage to even fuck up wet dreams.

The porn industry pretty operates on the basis of female stars. However, they like to have males of all races pronging the ladies. Thus, you would either have to bring the Chinese porn star lady to the shoot or bring several scruffy males and a video crew to the Chinese lady. The transportation costs would eat up any savings and more.
They don't even use regular Hollywood film crews for porn shoots, because it requires (believe it or not) special skills to tape a porn video. Thus, it really wouldn't work to use a Chinese video crew.
 
The porn industry pretty operates on the basis of female stars. However, they like to have males of all races pronging the ladies. Thus, you would either have to bring the Chinese porn star lady to the shoot or bring several scruffy males and a video crew to the Chinese lady. The transportation costs would eat up any savings and more.
They don't even use regular Hollywood film crews for porn shoots, because it requires (believe it or not) special skills to tape a porn video. Thus, it really wouldn't work to use a Chinese video crew.


Besides, porn is illegal in China.
 
But of course, our worthy (??) members of parliament get a trifle confused, to the amusement of the rest of us:
See Here.
 
They don't even use regular Hollywood film crews for porn shoots, because it requires (believe it or not) special skills to tape a porn video. Thus, it really wouldn't work to use a Chinese video crew.

Ya reckon! You musta been living a very sheltered life - The Japs, the Koreans, the Thais make porn by the truckload. Of course the Chinese can and do make porn - provided there's a kick back to the protection racketeers (sorry, party bosses).

Maria Ozawa is good Muslim Indonesia's most popular actress - Google her. Chinese Indonesians facilitate the business there.
 
kind of sounds like there will be work for this guy over there soon.

creedy.jpg



Sorry if pic is too big just learning this as I go.
 
Oddly, I find myself a bit on the fence with this. I'm against the banning of certain search terms and against the banning of content, of course. That part is easy for me. Otherwise, maybe I'm missing something. I understand the article to say porn will automatically be filtered by ISPs unless specifically requested by the customer. While I'm not comfortable with the government knowing I'm opting in or out of porn, I'm not necessarily against a company volunteering to block porn as a default setting as an arrangement to avoid future regulation. It's what happens after someone says, "Hey, I want unfiltered access!" when things become problematic for me. If offering a preinstalled (and easily rejected) filter pacifies the ultra-uptight as protection, I can be okay with it.
 
Ya reckon! You musta been living a very sheltered life - The Japs, the Koreans, the Thais make porn by the truckload. Of course the Chinese can and do make porn - provided there's a kick back to the protection racketeers (sorry, party bosses).

Maria Ozawa is good Muslim Indonesia's most popular actress - Google her. Chinese Indonesians facilitate the business there.

I'm the co-author, with Sunset Thomas, the porn star, of Anatomy of An Adult Film. What I should have said is that a normal film or video crew really can't do porn. With a normal video taping, you can reshoot a scene, if the crew fucks up. With porn, once the male star comes, that's it for at least a while. The crew has to tape it right, the very first time. Also, the set for a porn shoot is usually a rented house. If you find that part of the shoot didn't go right, you may not be able to reshoot in the same set.
 
I'm the co-author, with Sunset Thomas, the porn star, of Anatomy of An Adult Film. What I should have said is that a normal film or video crew really can't do porn. With a normal video taping, you can reshoot a scene, if the crew fucks up. With porn, once the male star comes, that's it for at least a while. The crew has to tape it right, the very first time. Also, the set for a porn shoot is usually a rented house. If you find that part of the shoot didn't go right, you may not be able to reshoot in the same set.

I've not read your book (wish it was available in an ebook format, btw) - but here's another element of porn shooting that has to be tricky - multiple camera views and keeping each other out of the shot. Not sure how many porn shoots use multiple cameras. For a lot of Hollywood fare, scenes are shot and re-shot with the expensive, rented camera being moved to capture the "over the shoulder" conversation, etc. It's why IMDB.com lists things like jumping cups or hair that's one way for one shot and different way for another shot. It seems most porn is shot with two cameras. I'm curious how accurate that is.
 
I've not read your book (wish it was available in an ebook format, btw) - but here's another element of porn shooting that has to be tricky - multiple camera views and keeping each other out of the shot. Not sure how many porn shoots use multiple cameras. For a lot of Hollywood fare, scenes are shot and re-shot with the expensive, rented camera being moved to capture the "over the shoulder" conversation, etc. It's why IMDB.com lists things like jumping cups or hair that's one way for one shot and different way for another shot. It seems most porn is shot with two cameras. I'm curious how accurate that is.

What normally happens is that a director is given a script, which may be anything from a sketchy outline to a detailed shooting script, and a budget. How much the director spends on any item is his/her discretion. However the total is a fixed sum. More camera's less performers, fancier set, less well known star(s), etc.
 
Back
Top