okay, republicans...

[butters]

...i understand about voting for your party, i do, but have any of you who voted for trump decided it's time he should be replaced by someone else in the republican party?

are any of you really concerned about him representing you as republicans now he's had time to show how he operates as president? are any of you wanting republican politicians to take a stand against his behaviour/lies/methodology?

this isn't about do you wish you weren't a republican; i get that democracy works best when all voters are represented. it's about alternate possibilities.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Just to be clear, I didn't vote for him....but if the (D)'s run some regressive socialist bigot in 2020 and he runs again? He will be the first Republican I ever vote for for POTUS.


Actually, until (D)'z let go of socialism as well as the intersectional bigotry and get back to being liberals in their official platform, I will not be supporting any (D)'s.

...i understand about voting for your party, i do, but have any of you who voted for trump decided it's time he should be replaced by someone else in the republican party?

Being highly liberal the only (R) I could really see replacing him with out and pushing the country the right way would be Rand Paul.

The rest of them are spineless weenies that are just as control freak and oppressive as the (D)'s.

are any of you really concerned about him representing you as republicans now he's had time to show how he operates as president? are any of you wanting republican politicians to take a stand against his behaviour/lies/methodology?

DJT was elected for being the exact opposite of a PC lefty.

None of his supporters want him to turn hysterical SJW male feminist.

this isn't about do you wish you weren't a republican; i get that democracy works best when all voters are represented. it's about alternate possibilities.

They are manifesting on both sides, thanks to Trump.

But we aren't there yet.

 

[HisArpy]

No.

Trump is fine as a President. He works for the American people and tries to do what he believes is best for the country.

You may not like him as a person. You may not agree with his personal/political views, but as President he has yet to let us down.

As opposed to Obama, who drew a red line in the sand and didn't enforce it, he did his job against Syria when they tested our resolve and used Chem Weapons.

As opposed to Obama, who allowed Putin the seize and annex Crimea without resistance or objection, Trump has added more sanctions against Russia and recently exited a planned meeting with Putin after Putin blockaded Ukraine.

As opposed to Bush, who declared a never ending war "won" and "over", Trump is attempting to withdraw from the Middle East as best he can while not leaving US interests there unprotected. It's complicated and made more difficult by the participants who need US involvement to aid credibility to their problems, but Trump is trying to do what he promised.

As opposed to all past Presidents who have "said" they're going to move the Israeli Embassy but who did NOTHING, Trump not only moved the embassy to Jerusalem, but he did it on the cheap.

There are more parallels, but I won't list them because the above should be enough.

What I don't get is how the D's can praise Bill Clinton as a "good President", even though as a person he wasn't all that wonderful, yet declare Trump to be a "horrible President" for obtaining the same economic results with (assuming only for the purposes of this statement) the same or similar conduct toward women. The only difference is the party affiliation and that should NEVER be the basis to judge anyone about anything.

 

[BotanyBoy]

What I don't get is how the D's can praise Bill Clinton as a "good President", even though as a person he wasn't all that wonderful, yet declare Trump to be a "horrible President" for obtaining the same economic results with (assuming only for the purposes of this statement) the same or similar conduct toward women. The only difference is the party affiliation and that should NEVER be the basis to judge anyone about anything.

That's the media.

No matter HOW scummy.....they will church up every (D) POTUS as the greatest thing ever, the most beloved saint since the last (D) POTUS.

And every (R) POTUS is the most diabolical evil Nazi since the last (R) POTUS.

That's why all this shit the anti-Trump folks cry about, is only bad when (R)'s do it.

When a (D) does the exact same shit that's just "Whataboutism" and immediately dismissed.....because it's ok when (D)'s do it.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

No.

Trump is fine as a President. He works for the American people and tries to do what he believes is best for the country.

You may not like him as a person. You may not agree with his personal/political views, but as President he has yet to let us down.

As opposed to Obama, who drew a red line in the sand and didn't enforce it, he did his job against Syria when they tested our resolve and used Chem Weapons.

As opposed to Obama, who allowed Putin the seize and annex Crimea without resistance or objection, Trump has added more sanctions against Russia and recently exited a planned meeting with Putin after Putin blockaded Ukraine.

As opposed to Bush, who declared a never ending war "won" and "over", Trump is attempting to withdraw from the Middle East as best he can while not leaving US interests there unprotected. It's complicated and made more difficult by the participants who need US involvement to aid credibility to their problems, but Trump is trying to do what he promised.

As opposed to all past Presidents who have "said" they're going to move the Israeli Embassy but who did NOTHING, Trump not only moved the embassy to Jerusalem, but he did it on the cheap.

There are more parallels, but I won't list them because the above should be enough.

What I don't get is how the D's can praise Bill Clinton as a "good President", even though as a person he wasn't all that wonderful, yet declare Trump to be a "horrible President" for obtaining the same economic results with (assuming only for the purposes of this statement) the same or similar conduct toward women. The only difference is the party affiliation and that should NEVER be the basis to judge anyone about anything.

"Who's gonna pay for the wall?" "Mexico"!!!

 

[spacekowboy]

These dipshits arent going to admit that. Admitting that means they made a mistake and none of them will do that. Ever.

 

[BotanyBoy]

These dipshits arent going to admit that. Admitting that means they made a mistake and none of them will do that. Ever.

Or maybe there are a lot of people don't think it's a problem to not be a communist PC douche bag.

 

[HisArpy]

"Who's gonna pay for the wall?" "Mexico"!!!

1. Mexico WILL be paying for the wall. Just not directly as you and everyone else assumed.

2. Even if Mexico doesn't pay for the wall, I wonder if all of the promises you've ever made have been kept while laboring under similar opposition as Trump. I bet not.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

HarPy gets very upset at chemical attacks on kids*


*unless they deserve it

http://www.the-immoral-minority.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/migrants-border-tear-gas.jpg

No.

Trump is fine as a President. He works for the American people and tries to do what he believes is best for the country.

You may not like him as a person. You may not agree with his personal/political views, but as President he has yet to let us down.

As opposed to Obama, who drew a red line in the sand and didn't enforce it, he did his job against Syria when they tested our resolve and used Chem Weapons.

As opposed to Obama, who allowed Putin the seize and annex Crimea without resistance or objection, Trump has added more sanctions against Russia and recently exited a planned meeting with Putin after Putin blockaded Ukraine.

As opposed to Bush, who declared a never ending war "won" and "over", Trump is attempting to withdraw from the Middle East as best he can while not leaving US interests there unprotected. It's complicated and made more difficult by the participants who need US involvement to aid credibility to their problems, but Trump is trying to do what he promised.

As opposed to all past Presidents who have "said" they're going to move the Israeli Embassy but who did NOTHING, Trump not only moved the embassy to Jerusalem, but he did it on the cheap.

There are more parallels, but I won't list them because the above should be enough.

What I don't get is how the D's can praise Bill Clinton as a "good President", even though as a person he wasn't all that wonderful, yet declare Trump to be a "horrible President" for obtaining the same economic results with (assuming only for the purposes of this statement) the same or similar conduct toward women. The only difference is the party affiliation and that should NEVER be the basis to judge anyone about anything.

 

[Dribble]

These dipshits arent going to admit that. Admitting that means they made a mistake and none of them will do that. Ever.

Fact.

 

[HisArpy]

HarPy gets very upset at chemical attacks on kids*


*unless they deserve it

That wasn't an internationally banned "chemical weapons attack". It was BP using tear gas to disburse a mob attempting to overrun the US border by force. If you don't know the difference between Chem Weapons and tear gas, you should shut your yap.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

yes, the Dangerous Diaper Mob

That wasn't an internationally banned "chemical weapons attack". It was BP using tear gas to disburse a mob attempting to overrun the US border by force. If you don't know the difference between Chem Weapons and tear gas, you should shut your yap.

 

[Adre]

It’s sorta fun watching RP and BB contort themselves into pretzels rationalizing their support for a bumbling chief executive who has accomplished almost nothing except nominating two Justices (whose names he got off a list compiled by someone else) and signing a tax cut which, quite honestly, benefitted people like me who hardly needed it.

 

[HisArpy]

yes, the Dangerous Diaper Mob

Yes. The mob that was throwing rocks and bottles at law enforcement. Not a brilliant move but at least no one died from the use of those "chemical weapons". I mean, it's not like the US doesn't have the capability to annihilate EVERYONE in that situation yet somehow the evil, mean, nasty Trump supporting border patrol agents heroically restrained themselves in the face of an overwhelming number of hostile attackers approaching from a foreign country and no one died. Imagine that.

I also wonder why you haven't thought about WHY those moms had their kids there in the first place? Oh, that's right, they were "fleeing violence". The same violence they brought with them to the US border and tried to use to force their way across.

Not very "refugee like". But I think they understand and respect the sovereignity of the US border a little better now. Perhaps you should recommend they just get in line and wait their turn. That way their diaper brigade isn't put into any danger.

 

[cowslinger64]

Just to be clear, I didn't vote for him....but if the (D)'s run some regressive socialist bigot in 2020 and he runs again? He will be the first Republican I ever vote for for POTUS.


Actually, until (D)'z let go of socialism as well as the intersectional bigotry and get back to being liberals in their official platform, I will not be supporting any (D)'s.



Being highly liberal the only (R) I could really see replacing him with out and pushing the country the right way would be Rand Paul.

The rest of them are spineless weenies that are just as control freak and oppressive as the (D)'s.



DJT was elected for being the exact opposite of a PC lefty.

None of his supporters want him to turn hysterical SJW male feminist.



They are manifesting on both sides, thanks to Trump.

But we aren't there yet.

First one in is NOT AN R!!!!


Lol... You are not a liberal..Jeezus keerist. You're just another gop bukkakke boy.

The only people believing trump is doing any good, better be the people that just got a massive tax break... and they wouldn't be on here. There's little to nothing else he's done that benefits anyone here.

 

[HisArpy]

First one in is NOT AN R!!!!


Lol... You are not a liberal..Jeezus keerist. You're just another gop bukkakke boy.

The only people believing trump is doing any good, better be the people that just got a massive tax break... and they wouldn't be on here. There's little to nothing else he's done that benefits anyone here.

Welp, there went that theory...

It’s sorta fun watching RP and BB contort themselves into pretzels rationalizing their support for a bumbling chief executive who has accomplished almost nothing except nominating two Justices (whose names he got off a list compiled by someone else) and signing a tax cut which, quite honestly, benefitted people like me who hardly needed it.

 

[BotanyBoy]

First one in is NOT AN R!!!!

Leaning that way as they become the liberal party.

Lol... You are not a liberal..Jeezus keerist.

What about my politics isn't liberal?

This is the part where you deflect and cower because you don't even know what the fuck the word means

The only people believing trump is doing any good, better be the people that just got a massive tax break... and they wouldn't be on here. There's little to nothing else he's done that benefits anyone here.

There are probably several on here.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

1. Mexico WILL be paying for the wall. Just not directly as you and everyone else assumed.

2. Even if Mexico doesn't pay for the wall, I wonder if all of the promises you've ever made have been kept while laboring under similar opposition as Trump. I bet not.

I'm not the fucking president! I didn't ask American citizens to vote for me based upon a lie!

Mexico ain't payin' for shit.

 

[BotanyBoy]

It’s sorta fun watching RP and BB contort themselves into pretzels rationalizing their support for a bumbling chief executive

Contort??

How so?

I don't think I could have been anymore direct and to the point.

who has accomplished almost nothing except nominating two Justices (whose names he got off a list compiled by someone else) and signing a tax cut which, quite honestly, benefitted people like me who hardly needed it.

Yea, secured the Constitution from socialist shitheads, that's a plus.

Allowed people to keep more of their property/means of production/control over their lives.....increasing FREEDOM and it's sending the anti-liberal (D)ipshits and (R)e-thugz alike to the fucking moon and I LOVE IT.


BTW if you bought into your own bullshit you'd go take all that money and give it to some poor bums. You think they have a right to everyone elses shit. Why don't you put your money where you mouth is and voluntarily create the equity you want the government to stick a gun to everyone else head for by giving away any and all the things you don't NEED to those less fortunate than you.

But I bet you wont.....same reason none of these left states will lead the way and show us how that open border communist utopia they are selling really works.

 

[HAL_9000]

"You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time." - Abraham Lincoln

Also:

"There's a sucker born every minute." - PT Barnum

 

[Adre]

Contort??

How so?

I don't think I could have been anymore direct and to the point.



Yea, secured the Constitution from socialist shitheads, that's a plus.

Allowed people to keep more of their property/means of production/control over their lives.....increasing FREEDOM and it's sending the anti-liberal (D)ipshits and (R)e-thugz alike to the fucking moon and I LOVE IT.


BTW if you bought into your own bullshit you'd go take all that money and give it to some poor bums. You think they have a right to everyone elses shit. Why don't you put your money where you mouth is and voluntarily create the equity you want the government to stick a gun to everyone else head for by giving away any and all the things you don't NEED to those less fortunate than you.

But I bet you wont.....same reason none of these left states will lead the way and show us how that open border communist utopia they are selling really works.

You make a lot of assumptions there stoner boy. All I said was I didn’t need the tax cut. What’s wrong with wanting the middle class to benefit from a tax cut? The difference between you and me is you don’t give a fuck about anything but yourself and you think anyone who does care is a sucker. That’s cool, you’re a miserable unhappy prick, and you have every right to be one.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Defending tear gassing kids in diapers.

btw Assad has his reasons for gassing kids. Makes perfect sense to him.

Yes. The mob that was throwing rocks and bottles at law enforcement. Not a brilliant move but at least no one died from the use of those "chemical weapons". I mean, it's not like the US doesn't have the capability to annihilate EVERYONE in that situation yet somehow the evil, mean, nasty Trump supporting border patrol agents heroically restrained themselves in the face of an overwhelming number of hostile attackers approaching from a foreign country and no one died. Imagine that.

I also wonder why you haven't thought about WHY those moms had their kids there in the first place? Oh, that's right, they were "fleeing violence". The same violence they brought with them to the US border and tried to use to force their way across.

Not very "refugee like". But I think they understand and respect the sovereignity of the US border a little better now. Perhaps you should recommend they just get in line and wait their turn. That way their diaper brigade isn't put into any danger.

 

[BotanyBoy]

You make a lot of assumptions there stoner boy. All I said was I didn’t need the tax cut.

Said a bit more than that bubba....

a tax cut which, quite honestly, benefitted people like me who hardly needed it.

As if their need is even relevant to the issue of it being theirs or not.

Along with your ardent support of socialistic policy and the (D)'s pushing it, that's pretty fucking far from an assumption.

But I'll give you a chance to go back on all that.

You want to disavow socialistic policy and (D)emocrats on their current platform??

I'll accept that....but there will be questions

What’s wrong with wanting the middle class to benefit from a tax cut?

Any middle class making enough to be paying taxes in the first place did benefit.

Now their STATE might have fucked them for that if they live in a deep blue one with heavy handed income taxes.....but that's not what we are talking about here.

The difference between you and me is you don’t give a fuck about anything but yourself and you think anyone who does care is a sucker. That’s cool, you’re a miserable unhappy prick, and you have every right to be one.

And there is the lie we had to make up...just HAD to.

That's not true.

The difference is that I think outside of some civil services structured and funded in a fair and equitable manner, in accordance with the liberal ideals and values the USA was founded upon, individuals should be allowed to decide how their income/wealth is spent.


With your huge support for the (D)'s, their socialistic policy and open hostility towards any sort of economic liberty I'm left to guess that you seem to think otherwise.

Right??

Like I said you can claim yourself otherwise, but everything you've ever presented here on the GB screams lefty right down to the language you use when talking about other peoples property.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Defending tear gassing kids in diapers.

btw Assad has his reasons for gassing kids. Makes perfect sense to him.

Yea because genocidal gassing entire villages with some of the most horrible weapons mankind has ever dreamed up is totally the same thing as non-lethally tear gassing violent shitheads who are pissed because our law enforcement officials were doing their job by not allowing them to violate our laws or borders.

Your false equivalencies are getting grander by the day.


BTW if they don't want to get gassed for throwing rocks at border patrol because they are preventing your illegal entry?

Don't try to enter illegally or throw rocks at USBP.

 

[cowslinger64]

Welp, there went that theory...

There isn't anyone in the one percent or ceo of a major corporation here.

Theory stands.