Okay, here's a wacky one...

[Bramblethorn]

Was it here that someone mentioned that one forum somewhere had as a bannable offense "any behavior that requires the moderators to add a new bannable offense to the list?"

I mentioned that recently, though I don't recall where I first encountered it.

 

[Rustyoznail]

https://imgur.com/gallery/azKjg

 

[KeithD]

I wouldn't be surprised if sex between a human and a dinosaur would NOT pass here, if it were a dinosaur species thought actually to have existed.

 

[BiscuitHammer]

I'll be honest, I'm just surprised we're all not bickering right now about what the best rendition of the Olympic anthem was.

Or what the best dinosaur was.

I feel very grown up. XD

 

[RejectReality]

Terrible quality, but at least this one has the context for the running gag that episode.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuiIu3YNeiU

I will never hear "meow" in that context without hearing Colin Mochrie, much the same as I can't hear ( or say ) Disappointed! or Asshole! without it emerging in Kevin Kline's voice from A Fish Called Wanda.

Just three words of many that have gained enduring soundbites in my head.

 

[RejectReality]

There are more or less two parts to it.

If it appears to be a natural animal, it's off limits. Talking dogs aren't going to fly, despite being capable of consent. The addition of intelligence and speech are irrelevant when it comes to natural, contemporary creatures.

When moving to unnatural creatures, they have to be intelligent, and therefore capable of consent. If the creature isn't an established fantasy creature, ( to such a point that Laurel is aware of it at first glance ) simply having intelligence may not be sufficient for it to get through.

The example that always comes up as skirting the rules is the unicorn. "It's just slapping a horn on a horse." If unicorns weren't well established fantasy creatures, they would probably run afoul of the rejection stamp for that very reason. A dog with a feathered tail isn't likely to pass, even if capable of consent. It's essentially still a dog, and therefore fails the first test. The difference is a standing history of it being a fantasy creature at least capable of intelligence.

Which brings us to dinosaurs...

Personally, I feel that dinosaurs and all the other strange lineages of extinct creatures that have no comparable modern equivalent should be treated the same as fantasy creatures. You're never going to meet one in real life. Nobody owns them as pets. Nobody's eating them. Nobody's riding them. Nobody's ever even seen one in the entire history of upright walking apes.

If demonstrated to have intelligence capable of consent, they should be classified in much the same way as unicorns, phoenixes, sphinxes, and the like.

Then you have the whole other level of critters that evoke modern animals without really being similar. Some of the plesiosaurs have body plans that are very similar to toothy whales. Some synapsids could easily evoke modern mammals. Pteranodons kind of have a bat vibe. That gets a little dicier. It's not like a T-rex or a Stegosaurus that resemble dragons more than any modern animal.

What call Laurel would make is in question, but that's where it would fall in my eyes, based upon the calls that have been made in the past.

I honestly think that anything that would pass Lit muster would fail for someone looking for dino-banging. The addition of sufficient intelligence makes them a lot less dinosaury, and I feel as if that is what someone asking for dino-banging is really after.

So, could you get away with it? Quite possibly. Would it be what the person asking for it was looking for? Not likely.

 

[Ginlover]

T-Rex held the body of Sunshine by the neck, the mane catching between his teeth. Having short upper limbs meant T’s dexterity was perfection. He angled his hemipenis with Sunshine’s holes and deftly slide the little pony onto his lizardhood. Sunshine had relaxed in to a bliss of utopia. Her pink hooves swayed as T lifted and lowered her still firmly gripping her neck in his mouth. He looked at Simon and his expression simply said, ‘that’s how a T-Rex masturbates, we use a toy’.

Do I get bonus points for DP?

 

[SimonDoom]

T
When moving to unnatural creatures, they have to be intelligent, and therefore capable of consent. .

Is this true? I can see the logic of it, but is this really the rule?


Suppose the story takes place in another galaxy on a planet that has creatures that are sluglike, with sluglike intelligence, and they have an orifice that has been discovered to be of use for sexual pleasure for humans? Would sex with such a nonexistent, but also nonintelligent, creature, incapable of giving consent as we know it, be prohibited at Lit? I have no idea.

Would it make a difference if sex with the creature did not hurt it? If it was a symbiotic relationship? Mutually beneficial in some way?

I wrote and published a story about an invasion of creatures from outer space that closely resemble the aquatic worm amusingly known as the Penis Fish (scientific name Urechis caupo). It resembles a penis, and women begin using them as dildos and fall under their power. The suggestion is that the alien Penis Fish have some degree of intelligence and are seeking out these encounters, but the exact level of intelligence is never made clear. That story initially did NOT pass the prohibition on grounds of bestiality, but I sent a note to Laurel and she ultimately let it pass.

I also wrote a tentacle sex story involving an alien being that resembled a giant octopus. It could talk and was highly intelligent and that story had no problem.

 

[BiscuitHammer]

I also wrote a tentacle sex story involving an alien being that resembled a giant octopus. It could talk and was highly intelligent and that story had no problem.

That probably falls under the category of giant freaking monster, which isn't offside. Tentacle monsters are always good. Toshio Maeda paved the way.

... or Hokusai, with that woodblock print The Dream Of The Fisherman's Wife. Take your pick. Either way, tentacles for everyone who wants one!

 

[KeithD]

Which brings us to dinosaurs...

Personally, I feel that dinosaurs and all the other strange lineages of extinct creatures that have no comparable modern equivalent should be treated the same as fantasy creatures. You're never going to meet one in real life. Nobody owns them as pets. Nobody's eating them. Nobody's riding them. Nobody's ever even seen one in the entire history of upright walking apes.

The scenario the OP gives is the time period in which humans cohabited with dinosaurs, which have scientific basis as animals. It isn't case of a story where the dinosaurs are extinct. In that time period the pairing would be no different to a current story pairing a human with a horse or a dog.

I see this as no different in trying to slip by the ban on bestiality that we see a lots of here regarding underage.

 

[NotWise]

The scenario the OP gives is the time period in which humans cohabited with dinosaurs, which have scientific basis as animals. It isn't case of a story where the dinosaurs are extinct. In that time period the pairing would be no different to a current story pairing a human with a horse or a dog.

I see this as no different in trying to slip by the ban on bestiality that we see a lots of here regarding underage.

Humans and dinosaurs never cohabited. Dinosaurs were extinct for about 60 million years before homo sapiens appeared. The story concept is complete fantasy.

 

[SimonDoom]

Let's face it. This conversation has a "How many angels dance on the head of a pin" kind of quality. It's not something to take too seriously.

My own personal view is that personal distaste, no matter how strong, is not a basis for banning a type of story. The only legitimate basis is that the story may have a tendency to promote dangerous behavior in the real world. Pedophilia, rape, snuff, and torture may fit under this category (I say "may" because I am skeptical of, but open-minded about, the existence and degree of real-world risk of reading Literotica stories). I suppose stories about sex with dogs or sheep might justify this concern. But the application of this concept to sex with a dinosaur seems like a big stretch, to me. There are no dinosaurs. Dinosaurs and human beings never, ever lived together. The only way to put dinosaurs and humans together in an erotic story is to do so in a fantasy world that has never existed. It's like sex on another planet with an alien.

Nobody is going to read a story about dino sex and say, "I've got to find me an alligator!"

 

[BiscuitHammer]

Nobody is going to read a story about dino sex and say, "I've got to find me an alligator!"

Never met Florida Man, have you? XD

 

[SimonDoom]

Never met Florida Man, have you? XD

My sense of things is that Florida Man probably can't read. Or figure out how to log on to Literotica.

 

[RejectReality]

The scenario the OP gives is the time period in which humans cohabited with dinosaurs, which have scientific basis as animals. It isn't case of a story where the dinosaurs are extinct. In that time period the pairing would be no different to a current story pairing a human with a horse or a dog.

I see this as no different in trying to slip by the ban on bestiality that we see a lots of here regarding underage.

By that logic, an interracial story set in the 1700s would be bestiality.

 

[RejectReality]

I'm not quoting rules here, but rather the trends I've seen of what gets approved and what gets rejected.

Your octopus got covered by tentacle monsters being a thing that Laurel knows of. The penis fish got rejected initially, but upon reading with the context you likely provided in your communication, she decided the story sufficiently demonstrated consent to pass.

The slug is an interesting question. Plants that are essentially living fleshlights or dildos have always gone through without issue. I still suspect Laurel would reject it as too similar to a contemporary animal on our world if the story did not demonstrate the creatures were intelligent and capable of consent.

Is this true? I can see the logic of it, but is this really the rule?


Suppose the story takes place in another galaxy on a planet that has creatures that are sluglike, with sluglike intelligence, and they have an orifice that has been discovered to be of use for sexual pleasure for humans? Would sex with such a nonexistent, but also nonintelligent, creature, incapable of giving consent as we know it, be prohibited at Lit? I have no idea.

Would it make a difference if sex with the creature did not hurt it? If it was a symbiotic relationship? Mutually beneficial in some way?

I wrote and published a story about an invasion of creatures from outer space that closely resemble the aquatic worm amusingly known as the Penis Fish (scientific name Urechis caupo). It resembles a penis, and women begin using them as dildos and fall under their power. The suggestion is that the alien Penis Fish have some degree of intelligence and are seeking out these encounters, but the exact level of intelligence is never made clear. That story initially did NOT pass the prohibition on grounds of bestiality, but I sent a note to Laurel and she ultimately let it pass.

I also wrote a tentacle sex story involving an alien being that resembled a giant octopus. It could talk and was highly intelligent and that story had no problem.

 

[KeithD]

By that logic, an interracial story set in the 1700s would be bestiality.

No, it wouldn't.

Your discussion of "extinct" was irrelevant to the OP's scenario.

 

[KeithD]

Humans and dinosaurs never cohabited. Dinosaurs were extinct for about 60 million years before homo sapiens appeared. The story concept is complete fantasy.

The situation the author puts them in isn't. It simply is moving a bestiality story back in time.

 

[gordo12]

The situation the author puts them in isn't. It simply is moving a bestiality story back in time.

Easily remedied by having extinct fantasy creatures. T-Rax or velocirapturous or...

 

[RejectReality]

No, it wouldn't.

Your discussion of "extinct" was irrelevant to the OP's scenario.

Not in regards to what will and will not pass on Literotica. Odds are you didn't notice the end of my post, ( as you have a habit of jumping the gun ) but I said that my impression of what the person requesting the story actually wanted was unlikely to pass because it would run afoul of the bestiality restrictions.

What I'm discussing is not how to skirt those guidelines, but rather what version of the requested storyline could potentially land within acceptable parameters, even though it probably wouldn't satisfy the kink of the person requesting it.

Similarity to existing animals has bearing on whether it will survive the vetting process. ( Absent widely known lore, as in the case of unicorns or tentacle monsters )

Assuming you were calling out my sentient dinosaurs scenario rather than what the person making the request probably wanted, my response is accurate. Slaves were considered sub-human, and therefore animals, despite demonstrating intelligence capable of consenting or refusing to. In the context of the setting, that's bestiality by the standards you're establishing.

 

[PBAnnie]

And let's not forget the eternal and ubiquitous catgirls of anime, right?

In the very first episode of "Thundercats" they are all naked...

 

[PBAnnie]

Show of hands: Who else heard this in Colin Mochrie's voice?

I heard Bob Newhart.

 

[BiscuitHammer]

In the very first episode of "Thundercats" they are all naked...

I had SUCH a crush on Cheetara when I was a kid, lol. I think she was my only 'furry' crush...