Okay, Bush bashers, Clinton was warned too

M

miles

Guest
Speak up, Bozos



1999 Report Warned of Suicide Hijack
Fri May 17, 1:09 PM ET
By JOHN SOLOMON, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Exactly two years before the Sept. 11 attacks, a federal report warned the executive branch that Osama bin Laden (news - web sites)'s terrorists might hijack an airliner and dive bomb it into the Pentagon (news - web sites) or other government building.



"Suicide bomber(s) belonging to al-Qaida's Martyrdom Battalion could crash-land an aircraft packed with high explosives (C-4 and semtex) into the Pentagon, the headquarters of the Central Intelligence Agency (news - web sites) (CIA (news - web sites)), or the White House," the September 1999 report said.

The report, entitled the "Sociology and Psychology of Terrorism: Who Becomes a Terrorist and Why?," described the suicide hijacking as one of several possible retribution attacks al-Qaida might seek for the 1998 U.S. airstrike against bin Laden's camps in Afghanistan (news - web sites).

The report noted that an al-Qaida-linked terrorist first arrested in the Philippines in 1995 and later convicted in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing had suggested such a suicide jetliner mission.

"Ramzi Yousef had planned to do this against the CIA headquarters," author Rex Hudson wrote in a report prepared for the National Intelligence Council and shared with other federal agencies.

The intelligence council is attached to the CIA and is made up of a dozen senior intelligence officers who assist the U.S. intelligence community in analysis of threats and priorities.

The report contrasts with Bush administration officials' assertions that none in government had imagined an attack like Sept. 11 before that time.

"I don't think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon; that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile," national security adviser Condoleezza Rice (news - web sites) said Thursday.

The report was written by the Federal Research Division, an arm of the Library of Congress (news - web sites) that provides research for various federal agencies under contracts.

The report was based solely on open-source information that the federal researchers gathered about the likely threats of terrorists, according to Robert L. Worden, the division's chief he federal research division.

"This information was out there, certainly to those who study the in-depth subject of terrorism and al-Qaida," Worden said.

"We knew it was an insightful report," he said. "Then after Sept. 11 we said, 'My gosh, that (suicide hijacking) was in there.'"

Asked about the report at his daily press briefing, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer (news - web sites) described it as a psychological, sociological evaluation of terrorism.

"I don't think it's a surprise to anybody that terrorists think in evil ways," he said.

"It is not a piece of intelligence information suggesting that we had information about a specific plan."

Former CIA Deputy Director John Gannon, who was chairman of the National Intelligence Council when the report was written, said U.S. intelligence long has known a suicide hijacker was a possible threat.

"If you ask anybody could terrorists convert a plane into a missile, nobody would have ruled that out," he said. He called the 1999 report part of a broader effort by his council to identify for U.S. intelligence the full range of attack options for terrorists and U.S. enemies.

"It became such a rich threat environment that it was almost too much for Congress and the administration to absorb," he said. "They couldn't prioritize what was the most significant threat."

Gannon, who served both Democratic and Republican presidents, said Americans need to make a distinction between knowing the type of vulnerabilities terrorist could exploit and knowing the attacks were imminent.

He said criticism that President Bush (news - web sites)'s August briefing should have alerted the administration to the attacks was "egregiously unfair. The president wasn't given actionable intelligence," he said.
 
well darn, I saw the term "Bush Basher" and thought I was going to look at dirty pics! Imagine my suprise
 
Eight years of Bill Clinton decimates our military, our intelligence agencies, and our abilities to get human intelligence "on the ground", and his lackeys in Congress and elsewhere are the first to criticize Bush...a president who DID take positive steps to defend America and press a full-scale war against terrorism.
 
Sorry Miles, this article supports my bottom line he (or those in his administration) even had access to this information and failed to act. It happened on Bush's watch and he is responsible. It is like an employer being culpable for his employees. War time or not, he has questions to answer.
They have maintained all along that nobody could guess the hijackers were going to use the planes a missles. Lies, all lies and this article proves it.

Loved the last line "The President was not given actionable intelligence." At this point I wonder if he had the intelligence to see "actionable intelligence".

HotXBozo
 
Clinton knew, Clinton prevented it for 8 years.

Bush knew, Bush didn't prevent it.

Impeach Bush.
 
Unregistered said:
Clinton knew, Clinton prevented it for 8 years.

Bush knew, Bush didn't prevent it.

Impeach Bush.

What a totally moronic post.

Would you like a list of the terrorist attacks under Clinton, and his complete and utter failure to declare war against the terrorists responsible for 9-11?
 
KinkyKat, don't digress. Here and now and what the administration did and did not know and what they chose to do or not do with the information is the issue.

No one said Bush did not get baggage from other administrations. We are saying he did not act on info he had. All that Clinton stuff is an even bigger reason Bush should have been on high alert from this faction of terrorist.

Look at the cartoon. It says it all. We are suffering from the DUH-BYA factor. If not his personal duh then the inefficiency of the people he is responsible for.

Responsibility and accountability comes with the job. It is the American way.
 
Yeah, and he bombed them and conservatives complained.

The problem with all of this is that before 9-11, there was not the political capital to increase security at airports. Even if bush read anything, he probably could not have done much because we would not have done anything but complain about the increased security.

Conservatives trying to point the finger at Clinton are as disengenuous as others trying to blame Bush.

Bush is fucked up, but this was not his fault. Like Clinton though, not disclosing facts, or waiting as long as he did, only hurts Bush and makes it look like he has something to hide.

Fact is, that the idea of using planes as missles is not new. In the phillipines a police officer reported such plans she discovered from terrorists. I believe she told the CIA, although it may have been the FBI.

That fact was known by Clinton and Bush Administrative agencies. The hijacking threat could have been linked to that information but was not.

Unfortunately for all of us, I do not think Clinton nor Bush pre-911 could have mustered the will of the people to support such drastic changes in airport security such that the outcome would have been changed.
 
Back
Top