Obama's Libya comment - makes him look like a douche!

[pornstarwannabe]

Debate #2. Forget about the Moderator injecting her fat ass into the debate and saying Obama said something at the Rose garden a day after the attack on Ben-Ga-z (she has since retracted her statement). He did make, at the Rose Garden, a general statement "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation..." That was not made specifically about this attack. But keep reading, Libs.

Obama looks like a douche either way. Why?
A. Assume that Obama did indeed mean to say, at the Rose Garden, that the attack was an act of terror. It's a stretch, I know, but for the sake of argument we'll assume he meant it that way. Then why did Sec. Rice and Obama call it spontaneous event for 2 weeks? Why did Obama claim, at the UN, that the video caused the attack? A "spontaneous" event and a "Terrorist Attack" are mutually exclusive. So he looks like a douche for calling it spontaneous after first calling it an attack.

B. Okay, okay, let's assume that the statement he made at the Rose Garden was a generic statement, and not a statement about the Ben-Ga-z attack. But at the debate #2, he said that at the Rose Garden, he called it a terrorist attack. (that's why Romney looked puzzled... he knew Obama was lying on stage). So Obama tried to back-peddle and change history... and ece asked the Moderator to back him up (her fat ass was wrong, of course) So he looks like a douche because 4 people died and he was more concerned about himself.


Chew on that, Libs. Defend it.

EDIT:
The Fat Ass did not backtrack after all. Obama still looks like a douche either way you cut it.

EDIT2: Emails are out RE: the attack. WH knew. Now Obama really looks like a douche..

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

They refuse to.



All they want to do is call Romney a liar.

Reminds me of Joe Pesci in "My Cousin Vinny" delivering his opening statement.

Everything that guy just said is bullshit.

 

[pornstarwannabe]

Holy crap. Not a single Lib to dispute the claim? I finally, after thousands of posts, hit the nail on the head???

Obama: DOTUS (Douche of the United States)

 

[Squibbs]

I stayed up all night working on this so I could post it the minute I woke up. So here it goes>>>DERP!

*PATS ON HEAD*

 

[pornstarwannabe]

*PATS ON HEAD*

I can only interpret that as "Job well done, PSW!"

Thank you for the compliment.

 

[Liar]

How long have you been practizing contortionism, PSW? That's some human pretzel shit going on right there.

 

[phrodeau]

Romney didn't do his homework. The end.

 

[pornstarwannabe]

How long have you been practizing contortionism, PSW? That's some human pretzel shit going on right there.

Bout 3 months?

Romney didn't do his homework. The end.

Well, you can say that. Did Obama's response to the question give anyone a warm fuzzy that the next 4 years will be different than the last 4? Not according to the media, and not according to me. No vision. It was just "hey, I have more to do. What, I do not know. But I have more. Trust me."

 

[Colonel Hogan]

Here's what the White House still has not apparently figured out.

Nobody gives half a damn what we call it. It doesn't matter if it was a case of road rage that spilled over into the consulate proper.

What matters is that in the midst of a war on terror that is now officially in its 11th year and in which embassies, consulates, ships in port and any other instrument or symbol of the United States government have been repeated targets we.....weren't.....prepared.

And the unanswerable question is, why......the......fuck......not?

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Here's what the White House still has not apparently figured out.

Nobody gives half a damn what we call it. It doesn't matter if it was a case of road rage that spilled over into the consulate proper.

What matters is that in the midst of a war on terror that is now officially in its 11th year and in which embassies, consulates, ships in port and any other instrument or symbol of the United States government have been repeated targets we.....weren't.....prepared.

And the unanswerable question is, why......the......fuck......not?

Weren't prepared for what - all contingencies? We cannot not borrow enough money from China to do that. If you think there will never be casualties then you are out of your fucking mind. Here is your answer: There is a war going on out there and people are going to die. End of fucking story.

You want those diplomats safer? You want the soldiers safer? You want there to be fewer casualties? Then bring them home! And that is what this President has been doing. At least he ended one war, killed Bin Laden, is getting us out of Afghanistan, is using technology rather than lives and is making a difference.

You really want to make bigger difference - vote Libertarian because that is the only party that wants us to stop being the policeman to the world. Until then - you get Benghazi.

 

[mercury14]

Debate #2. Forget about the Moderator injecting her fat ass into the debate and saying Obama said something at the Rose garden a day after the attack on Ben-Ga-z (she has since retracted her statement).

Candy did not retract her statement. Not even a little bit. If she retracted her statement you would be able to quote her.

He did make, at the Rose Garden, a general statement "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation..." That was not made specifically about this attack. But keep reading, Libs.

Here's the Sept 12 Obama quote:

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America.

Now tell me how these two sentences which are in their own paragraph together are somehow completely unrelated to one another. I'll give you until the morning to respond since being shown the President's words in a little context probably threw you off guard.

 

[unregistered]

 

[bra_man69]

Candy did not retract her statement. Not even a little bit. If she retracted her statement you would be able to quote her.



Here's the Sept 12 Obama quote:

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America.

Now tell me how these two sentences which are in their own paragraph together are somehow completely unrelated to one another. I'll give you until the morning to respond since being shown the President's words in a little context probably threw you off guard.

Shut up
Go read his fucking speech that he said in front of the UN.

 

[mercury14]

Obama is prepared for the world as he wants it to be, not how it really is.

People who are confident that their candidate won a debate (big time according to you) do not whine about the moderator or moan about semantics like this.

Let's say Obama didn't immediately call Benghazhi an act of terror? So? Wouldn't you want the president to wait for a more sober moment when more facts were known before calling it whatever it is? Look how badly Romney flubbed the facts when he tried to turn this tragedy into votes even before families of the slain could be notified. He confused an Egyptian embassy-level press release for occurring in Libya and said Obama apologized even before Obama spoke.

Romney didn't fall in a hole in the Libya segment of the debate because he didn't have any valid points he could have made. He fell in a hole because he made a big deal out of a piddly semantic issue instead of sticking to his game plan. The audience laughed at him because he looked foolish and horribly off-track. And here you all are doing the exact same thing, focusing on insisting Obama never said something that even Fox News acknowledges he said.

 

[mercury14]

Shut up
Go read his fucking speech that he said in front of the UN.

That has nothing to do with Mitt Romney fuddling around with false accusations that Obama didn't call it an act of terror for 14 days. The quote I just gave you proves Obama called it an Act of Terror on Sept 12th. If you pull the RW tactic of removing the line from its context - including the rest of its own paragraph where he links the 'Act of Terror' phrase specifically to Benghazi - then you make it look like a general comment. But words mean something. The things Obama said before and after the Act of Terror phrase mean something. You can't just pretend they don't exist and say you're arguing at all honestly.

I mean... Wow. The entire reason the Rose Garden speech happened was because of the immediate crisis Benghazi and you're going to sit here and say the president was just rambling on about unrelated matters? That sounds plausible to you?

If you're this pissy then you must think your guy lost really badly.

 

[Beco]

That has nothing to do with Mitt Romney fuddling around with false accusations that Obama didn't call it an act of terror for 14 days. The quote I just gave you proves Obama called it an Act of Terror on Sept 12th. If you pull the RW tactic of removing the line from its context - including the rest of its own paragraph where he links the phrase specifically to Benghazi - then you make it look like a general comment. But words mean something. The things Obama said before and after the Act of Terror phrase mean something. You can't just pretend they don't exist and say you're arguing at all honestly.

If you're this pissy then you must think your guy lost really badly.

he didnt, his people did, not the same thing

 

[bra_man69]

That has nothing to do with Mitt Romney fuddling around with false accusations that Obama didn't call it an act of terror for 14 days.

He didn't stupid.
Look another time he could of
September 25, on ABC's "The View,"
interviewer Joy Behar asked Obama
about a remark made by his secretary of
state. "I heard Hillary Clinton say it was
an act of terrorism. Is it? What do you
say?"

To that, Obama responded, "We're still
doing an investigation. There's no doubt
that (with) the kind of weapons that were
used, the ongoing assault, that it wasn't
just a mob action. We don't have all the
information yet, so we're still gathering
it. But what's clear is that around the
world there's still a lot of threats out
there." Obama added that "extremist
militias" were suspected to have been
involved.

 

[mercury14]

he didnt, his people did, not the same thing

He did on Sept 12th in the Rose Garden which I just quoted for you. Let me give you a refresher.

OBAMA: No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America.

 

[mercury14]

He didn't stupid.

He looked stupid and the audience was laughing at him for it.

It doesn't matter what he said on the View since he already called it an Act of Terror on the 12th. And then again on the 13th. The fact that he didn't grace the ladies of The View with information on the attack doesn't mean he magically didn't say what he did on the 12th and 13th.

 

[bra_man69]

He looked stupid and the audience was laughing at him for it.

It doesn't matter what he said on the view since he already called it an Act of Terror on the 12th. And then again on the 13th.

ok you believe what you want.

 

[pornstarwannabe]

Candy did not retract her statement. Not even a little bit. If she retracted her statement you would be able to quote her.



Here's the Sept 12 Obama quote:

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America.

Now tell me how these two sentences which are in their own paragraph together are somehow completely unrelated to one another. I'll give you until the morning to respond since being shown the President's words in a little context probably threw you off guard.

I read the transcript. He used Act of Terror in a generic way, and not as a reference to the consulate attack. But... look at the OP again, specifically, part A. If what you say is correct, i.e. he used the term to indeed describe the attack as an act of terror, then why on God's Green Earth did Rice and Hillary tell everyone for weeks that the attack was due to a spontaneous event caused by the Video? Why did Obama tell the UN all about some vile video that was not the cause of the event?

I still contend that a spontaneous event is different than a planned attacked. The consulate attack was either planned or it was not.

 

[phrodeau]

I read the transcript. He used Act of Terror in a generic way, and not as a reference to the consulate attack. But... look at the OP again, specifically, part A. If what you say is correct, i.e. he used the term to indeed describe the attack as an act of terror, then why on God's Green Earth did Rice and Hillary tell everyone for weeks that the attack was due to a spontaneous event caused by the Video? Why did Obama tell the UN all about some vile video that was not the cause of the event?

I still contend that a spontaneous event is different than a planned attacked. The consulate attack was either planned or it was not.

Look up Sun Tsu.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Obama is prepared for the world as he wants it to be, not how it really is.

Have a nap gramps. This President is dealing with the world as it is and not like BUSH. He took office and they flew planes into the Towers. Obama took office kicked ass, ended one war, killed bin Laden and has managed to garner the respect of the world.

You want to see dealing with the world as it really is - ? Reelect Obama and see the fucking wrath unleashed on the cocksuckers that killed J. Christopher Stevens. Libya has already singled out Ahmed Abu Khattala as the person responsible because they are so fucking scared shit of what Obama will do they gave him up.

 

[unregistered]

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Keep drinking the Kool Aide dunce, it won't be long now.

Well you got that right - It won't be long now.