Obamaniacs must feel like an attorney defending a child molester

M

miles

Guest
They know he's reprehensible but feel compelled to support him publicly. It must suck to be you.
 
Child molesters (teachers) are a crucial special interest group of the Democrat Party.
 
Miles conflating Obama supporters with child molesters?



Eat kosher shit and die, Miles! :)
 
I don't see anyone defending you, miles.

Keep up the good work, chomo.
 
The smell of desperation hangs around miles like week old dirty socks.

And grows even more pungent with every passing day.
 
The smell of desperation hangs around miles like week old dirty socks.

And grows even more pungent with every passing day.

The really interesting thing is the different reasons the Lit Marines Without Honor™ oppose President Obama

  • 4est_4est_Gump simply has problems with non-Republican authority figures
  • The Vettebigot has problems with Negroes who don't "know their role" in society
  • Miles, though, is different. He has unresolved issues with his mother, who is a huge Obama supporter. (I'm not revealing personal information here either...Miles let this slip quite a while back).
 
The smell of desperation hangs around miles like week old dirty socks.

And grows even more pungent with every passing day.

Is it the week old dirty socks that are hanging around miles, or the week old dirty sock's smell?

Because your post wasn't very clear on that point.
 
So far the responses suggest that it sucks to be Miles. I hope he didn't bet actual money on Myth winning.
 
Islandboy, take the dirty socks out of your mouth so we can hear you.
 
The irony, of course, is that the righties fucking hate Romney and have to do mental contortions to try and defend him at all.
 
"Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn."

I've been waiting 2 years to say that in a MilesThread.
 
He can do no wrong. He can tell monumental lies like, because Jefferson owned a Koran and invited a Tunisian diplomat to dinner after sunset to accommodate his religion, he had the first "Iftar Ramadan" dinner in the White House and that Islam was part of the founding of America.

The only reason Jefferson had that Koran was to study their culture and gain as much information as he could so that he could use it to kick their fucking asses in the Barbary wars a few years later. He didn't give a hoot in Hell about Islam or Ramadan.

The man is a serial liar and fabricates historical falsehoods to support his agenda.

Jefferson was a natural philosopher, a citizen of the world and an Enlightenment scholar. Did he study the ways of Indians with fascination because he wanted to sneak Great Spirit worship into the founding of the nation? No. He was just a curious guy who wanted to know everything.
 
The only reason Jefferson had that Koran was to study their culture and gain as much information as he could so that he could use it to kick their fucking asses in the Barbary wars a few years later. He didn't give a hoot in Hell about Islam or Ramadan.
.

You mean the ones where the US got the shit kicked out of them, losing their greatest warship, and had to rely on the French to clear up their mess fifty years later? Those Barbary Wars?
 
You are correct in that the establishment social elite have indeed presented us with a choice between two evils, one being lesser than the other. You are wrong however in characterizing the choice as intellectually difficult.

The differences between the two are stark and well defined. For instance, Romney is not an international apologist and does not seek to subordinate the political, economic, and military interests of the United States to the Third Word.

Romney, unlike Obama, understands that freedom is the real bedrock upon which our free enterprise system rests, not an oppressive centralized government dictating economic outcomes.

"Freedom" is not an economic plan.

"Not Obama" does not a Presidential platform make.
 
You are correct in that the establishment social elite have indeed presented us with a choice between two evils, one being lesser than the other. You are wrong however in characterizing the choice as intellectually difficult.

The differences between the two are stark and well defined. For instance, Romney is not an international apologist and does not seek to subordinate the political, economic, and military interests of the United States to the Third Word.

Romney, unlike Obama, understands that freedom is the real bedrock upon which our free enterprise system rests, not an oppressive centralized government dictating economic outcomes.

Unless you can give specific evidence of Obama's oppression, you're sounding more and more like that old man yelling for kids to get off his lawn.
 
Back
Top