Accept because it's all irrelevant culture-war shit and neither side threatens the plutocracy
Not so Swing Seats Swnging
- Thread starter ChloeTzang
- Start date
Fem-woktardation never does, it's all just vibes and doing what FEELS good in the moment.
That's why it's always a disaster.
That's all the same left wing group. You marxist don't decide who is and isn't left.
Over (D)umb fat bitch feminism?? Yes.....
Still better than the bullshit you're offering.....
Last edited:
You are an idiot.
What plutocracy? We have an elected government.
Facts are facts. Race socailist are still socialist. You class socialist don't have a monopoly on stealing from others because you suck
Cannot exist, no more than anarchist fascists can exist.
Last edited:
We only get to choose between candidates the plutocracy finds acceptable. We're no more a democracy than Iran, where the votes are counted fairly, but only candidates approved by the Guardian Council appear on the ballot.
They exist because class socialism isn't the only kind of socialism.
That's EXACTLY what it is. The whole point of socialism is equality -- if that's not the point, it isn't socialism.
Just because you let the Democrats cuck you dodn't make us a plutocracy.
You're just full of shit.
No it's not. Race socialism is still socialism.
Wall Street controls the Dems almost as much as it controls the Pubs, and we can't attack them effectively by voting Dem. THAT makes us a plutocracy.
LOL so you're just on the WRONG SIDE OF DEMOCRACY and can't handle it.
Got it.
There is no plutocracy, you're just a loser.
Hitler might have spoken of "race socialism," but he said a LOT of bullshit.
You're missing the point: We're still a plutocracy when the Dems WIN.
He is far from the only one and you know it.
Fascist LOVE strong collective control over the economy, just like the Marxist.....as all socialist do. It's literally what defines socialism.
No we're not...we elected them, that makes it not a plutocracy.
And YOUR fault, not rich peoples.
Words mean things.
It's a very different matter, though.
https://www.benespen.com/2014-10-1-the-long-view-fascism-a-history/
Fascism would not have been possible without Friedrich Nietzsche. There has been no lack of anti-theistic philosophers both before and after Nietzsche, but he is almost alone in honestly facing the consequences of living in a world in which everything is permitted. Most thinkers have sought to preserve some fragment of the intellectual structure that depended from the hypothesis of the Christian God, and so they appeal to reason or history or science. Nietzsche would have none of it. If the skies are really empty, then there are no imperatives. There is, however, life, which in the case of human beings expresses itself not just as biology but as the will. Now Nietzsche, unlike Schopenhauer and unlike many of his own followers, recognized the will is itself a composite entity. It is not a primary physical force, and it is not a god. It does, however, actually exist, and its exercise is all the meaning that life can ever have.
The proposition that the meaning of life is the exercise of the will leads to two kinds of conclusions. The most obvious, and the most popular, is the cult of cruelty. Naturally, the street-fighters who normally figure in the public activities of successful fascist parties are rarely well-read in the literature of philosophical nihilism. Nevertheless, even the nihilist violence of the German SA and the Italian "squadristi" chimes with high theory. Fascism promotes ruthlessness for the same reason that it promotes conspiracy theories: for a fascist, nothing is going to happen unless some will makes it happen. One suspects this consideration is also a factor in the usual fascist suspicion of free markets.
Only in which collectrive justifies to itself that it's ok to kill, subjugate and abuse the other for being part of the other.
That's why socialist shit holes be they Nazi, Fascistic or Marxist all look the same after application to the real world.
Oh, fascist states had certain points in common with Communist states -- but the differences were far more striking.
No they weren't, you're just a Marxist who think's it's REALLY different when it's the "proletariat" doing all the horrible shit....like being better at mass murder and genocide than the Fasicst or Nazis could have ever imagined.
LOL
Baztrachian
Ars est celare artem
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2019
- Posts
- 2,776
Fascism is just another form of socialism.
Baztrachian
Ars est celare artem
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2019
- Posts
- 2,776
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_fascism
In short, social democracy is just fascism with a different name.
In short, social democracy is just fascism with a different name.
Exactly....see Baz made it past the 3rd grade before (D)umbfuck woke tards took over the Pub-Lick "education" system.
All collectively owned/administered/controled means of production = socialism. The circumstances around that collective and their control of the means of production are define what KIND of socialism.
Marxist = class socialist
Nazis = ethno-nation (race) socailist.
Fascist = Nation state socailist
Liberal socialist = employee owned company/co-ops.
Etc.
RobDownSouth
General Disaster
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 79,019
CHAN madness increasing.
*nods*
*nods*
That's just something the Communists said when they were in electoral competition with the Social Democrats. It's bullshit.
Similar threads
