Saturn0815
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2021
- Posts
- 283
One in the same, just differnt political ideologies.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or him being a lifelong Democrat.So she has changed her position. Seems similar to Trump’s position on handling classified materials.
So basically you don't have a good argument so you are attacking my semantics.There's only reason you called her the border czar.....don't care whether you're moderate or not.
Sounds like a plan for ya then.
I'm pointing out that you're falling for the same bullshit that this thread is meant to do...conflating Harris's public support and change of position in order to cloud the discussion of good policy that Biden has enacted.So basically you don't have a good argument so you are attacking my semantics.
Why??? Biden is even more hypocritical, more incompetent and more of a liar than Harris. Biden will not run in 2024, he's too feeble.It's pretty presumtuous of you to assume I frequent far right media outlets, which I do not. I am very moderate.
Believe me I will not vote for her if she is on the ticket, my guess is Biden will probably replace her with someone else if he decides to run again.
Harris smoked dope when it was illegal, when she was AG she incarcerated people for the very same criminal behavior she participated in, she's a piece of shit.I'm pointing out that you're falling for the same bullshit that this thread is meant to do...conflating Harris's public support and change of position in order to cloud the discussion of good policy that Biden has enacted.
I don't have any desire to argue about Harris except to point out why she's being discussed. They literally can't find something bad about the policy so they're finding another vector to campaign on.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/kamal...-inmates-locked-up-for-cheap-labor?ref=scrollOrdered to reduce the population of California’s overcrowded prisons, lawyers from then-California Attorney General Kamala Harris’s office made the case that some non-violent offenders needed to stay incarcerated or else the prison system would lose a source of cheap labor.
In 2011, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Plata that California’s prisons were so overcrowded that they violated the Constitution’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. Three years later, in early 2014, the state was ordered to allow non-violent, second time offenders who have served half of their sentence to be eligible for parole.
According to court filings, lawyers for the state said California met benchmarks, and argued that if certain potential parolees were given a faster track out of prison, it would negatively impact the prison’s labor program including one that allowed certain inmates to work fighting California’s wildfires for about $2 a day.
The incident is just a small part of Harris’s long career as a prosecutor, which has drawn scrutiny from Democrats and activists who describe her as a late comer to the social justice movement.
Which part of that is your view on the policy that Biden enacted?Harris smoked dope when it was illegal, when she was AG she incarcerated people for the very same criminal behavior she participated in, she's a piece of shit.
Biden doesn't give two shits about incarcerated pot users, he's touting bullshit like he did by trying to eliminate student debt: BUYING VOTES THE SLEAZY WAY!!
https://static.prisonpolicy.org/scans/whos_in_prison_for_marij.pdf
If she ever is a primary candidate of consideration on my ballot, I certainly will. When it comes to others seeking to conflate good policy decisions with things like this to garner support for their bullshit, I'll clarify as I did, to expose their bullshit.
The topic is justice, the legal system, and Kamala Harris. The topic is not, "Let's praise some hack/slut politician who slept her way to the top". Harris is a piece of shit who doesn't give a fuck about justice. Praising her decades late purely political position without acknowledging her history as a prosecutor and fucking the boss to get ahead is not acknowledging reality.I bet she can stay on topic.
No, you are the one going on and on about your hatred of Harris while I remain focused on the marijuana policy which they are attempting to conflate.So you consider justice for victims of child rape and falsely accused prisoners kept behind bars "bullshit". It's just mean people trying to garner support for prosecuting pedophiles and releasing the falsely imprisoned. Completely illegitimate concerns for citizens who want justice for all. Got it.
Harris' marijuana policy is political hypocrisy at it's finest. I know the cucks from the Pussy Hat wing of the Democratic party don't like to acknowledge these facts but they exist whether you like them or not.No, you are the one going on and on about your hatred of Harris while I remain focused on the marijuana policy which they are attempting to conflate.
You can do whatever the fuck you want.....I'm just not here to follow you along.
The desperation is palpable.
Are you really going to give Vice President Harris shit for enforcing the laws during her time as DA?
SAD!
Harris doesn't have a marijuana policy. Biden does, and that's what she is supporting.Harris' marijuana policy is political hypocrisy at it's finest. I know the cucks from the Pussy Hat wing of the Democratic party don't like to acknowledge these facts but they exist whether you like them or not.
View attachment 2182266
It's literally in this thread, you no comprehending dumbfuck.Was this when she was Willy Brown’s sugar baby?
I love California politics.
No it doesn't. Stop pulling facts out of your ass and actually inform yourself before opening your pie hole.Harris doesn't have a marijuana policy. Biden does, and that's what she is supporting.
The Democratic party supports that policy as well.
Yes, it's a shift in the party policy, dumbass....that's why it's a big fucking deal.No it doesn't. Stop pulling facts out of your ass and actually inform yourself before opening your pie hole.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s biggest challenge to legalizing marijuana is his fellow Democrats.
But as it stands on Capitol Hill, Schumer does not have enough votes from his own party to pass cannabis reform, let alone the 10 or more Republicans necessary to reach 60 — the threshold needed to bypass a likely filibuster. If a cannabis vote was held in the Senate tomorrow, the bill would certainly fail.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/04/20/senate-democrats-weed-legalization-schumer-483747
If there’s no such problem why establish a policy, I know! its pure grandstanding and pandering to buy votes, a typical incompetent attempt at creating a policy in search of a ghost to impress an uninformed electorate. Like most of Biden’s policies there either destructive or thoughtless responses to Trump policies that did work. Biden is a narcissistic, insecure, incompetent fool playing Mr. tough guy.Which part of that is your view on the policy that Biden enacted?
Oh right...none of it.
I don't truly need to know your view on candidates....you spew it all the time. Is the policy good or bad and why? And yes, I know that it only addresses federal convicts and does not address the federal law regarding marijuana.
So you don't like the policy.If there’s no such problem why establish a policy, I know! its pure grandstanding and pandering to buy votes, a typical incompetent attempt at creating a policy in search of a ghost to impress an uninformed electorate. Like most of Biden’s policies there either destructive or thoughtless responses to Trump policies that did work. Biden is a narcissistic, insecure, incompetent fool playing Mr. tough guy.
You’d be hard pressed to find a conviction and jail time for the use of pot without an accompanying more serious violation of a criminal statute. Can anyone substantiate just how many pure pot users are in the federal system based purely on pot usage and no other crime that Biden feels an urgency to create a policy.So you don't like the policy.
You prefer that the federal government continue to keep offenders jailed and arrest and imprison new ones. And you don't think state governors and drug classification groups should reconsider their approach to marijuana either.
Got it.
The number is around 1600.You’d be hard pressed to find a conviction and jail time for the use of pot without an accompanying more serious violation of a criminal statute. Can anyone substantiate just how many pure pot users are in the federal system based purely on pot usage and no other crime that Biden feels an urgency to create a policy.