No, the purpose of the 2nd Amendment is not to facilitate insurrection

[Lazaran]

.
BoBo is right.

A bunch of small town Deplorables all across the country wet themselves and mobilized for an imaginary "BLM invasion" that never materialized because it never existed in the first place.

Sheriff Taylor and one bullet BoBo defended Mayberry Minnesota from "busloads" of BLM looters and rioters.

LMFAOOOOOOO

 

[Fuzzy1975]

.
BoBo is right.

A bunch of small town Deplorables all across the country wet themselves and mobilized for an imaginary "BLM invasion" that never materialized because it never existed in the first place.

Sheriff Taylor and one bullet BoBo defended Mayberry Minnesota from "busloads" of BLM looters and rioters.

LMFAOOOOOOO

It only happened in his mind......

 

[pecksniff]

IBTW, this scene to some extent or another went down in small towns ALL SUMMER LONG last year.

I hope none of the people in those towns will vote to re-elect their sheriffs. To summon an armed posse to deal with that situation would be as irresponsible and reckless as you could get -- anything BLM could do would be preferable to gunplay.

 

[CornusKousa]

.
BoBo is right.

A bunch of small town Deplorables all across the country wet themselves and mobilized for an imaginary "BLM invasion" that never materialized because it never existed in the first place.

Sheriff Taylor and one bullet BoBo defended Mayberry Minnesota from "busloads" of BLM looters and rioters.

LMFAOOOOOOO

Now BLM never existed!! LOL

We've gone from riots, to mostly peaceful protest to peaceful protesters to 'that never existed'.

Whatever you've got to tell yourself Laz.

 

[CornusKousa]

I hope none of the people in those towns will vote to re-elect their sheriffs.

We did pretty much right after that.

To summon an armed posse to deal with that situation would be as irresponsible and reckless as you could get --

No, letting BLM sac the place and violate it's residents would be irresponsible and reckless as you can get.

Why are you so fucking backwards about everything??

anything BLM could do would be preferable to gunplay.

As a resident of this town having it and my home destroyed is not preferable to gunning those who threaten it down like a feral pig infestation.

 

[vastiesmith100]

bell must be a math major in JR high!

maybe when he grows up and grows a set he'll understand that we gun owners are the Americans who pay for everything he has.

54% of ALL felonies in the US are committed by a group that represent 13% of the population. And it's actually worse than that. Within that 13% it's only males between the ages of 15 and 35 doing the crimes. So in reality we're only talking about 5% of the population.................maybe.

Another group that represents approx. 19% of the population commits another 27% of all felonies. And again, only males in the same age group, maybe 9% of that demographic.

So here we have 32% of the population committing 81% of all felonies by demographic group and by actual representation it's but 24%.

And those very same assholes are trying to tell me that I'm the problem!!!! That dog won't hunt.

 

[pecksniff]

maybe when he grows up and grows a set he'll understand that we gun owners are the Americans who pay for everything he has.

Most of the paying is done by unarmed blue staters.

 

[pecksniff]

As a resident of this town having it and my home destroyed is not preferable to gunning those who threaten it down like a feral pig infestation.

Then it's a good thing you're not a LEO.

 

[Wrong Element]

The idea that the framers' generation was just cool with the idea of armed overthrow of the government by mobs is contradicted by how they actually dealt with the mobs of that era.

This is something people would know if they had ever read anything other than NRA press releases.

 

[pecksniff]

The idea that the framers' generation was just cool with the idea of armed overthrow of the government by mobs is contradicted by how they actually dealt with the mobs of that era.

This is something people would know if they had ever read anything other than NRA press releases.

See Whiskey Rebellion.

 

[CornusKousa]

Then it's a good thing you're not a LEO.

Because it would be better if I just stood aside and let BLM destroy my home and violate my family and if I supported such things THAT would make me good LEO?

https://media4.giphy.com/media/jQmVFypWInKCc/200.gif

GOOD LEO's enforce the law, they don't enable terrorist scum like BLM or their racist bullshit.

 

[pecksniff]

Because it would be better if I just stood aside and let BLM destroy my home and violate my family and if I supported such things THAT would make me good LEO?

Yes, in preference to summoning an armed mob. There are entirely too many things that can go wrong with that and they're all worse than anything BLM does.

 

[CornusKousa]

Yes,

Then why are hired for EXPLICTLY the opposite purpose??

Enabling and promoting BLM to destroy/violate the town is the OPPOSITE of their sworn duty.

100% Backwards as always.....war is peace, freedom is slavery and ignorance is strength, the Peck motto.

There are entirely too many things that can go wrong with that and they're all worse than anything BLM does.

Like what???

What is worse than BLM destroying the town and violating it's residence?

 

[pecksniff]

Like what???

What is worse than BLM destroying the town and violating it's residence?

Anyone on either side getting shot.

 

[CornusKousa]

Anyone on either side getting shot.

I disagree....mowing down 6 bus loads of BLM protesters would have been better than a any people or property being violated by those fucking savages.

Besides, the coyotes would have the mess cleaned up over night.

Rebuilding the town would cost a bunch of money and take a lot of time.

 

[pecksniff]

I disagree....mowing down 6 bus loads of BLM protesters would have been better than a any people or property being violated by those fucking savages.

Besides, the coyotes would have the mess cleaned up over night.

Rebuilding the town would cost a bunch of money and take a lot of time.

You don't get to use deadly force to protect property, and they were never going to rape anybody.

 

[CornusKousa]

You don't get to use deadly force to protect property,

Sure I do....it's even totally legal in most if not all red states and even some more moderate blue ones. With more going constitutional carry/CD/SYG every month it seems lately.

Hell at my spot in Montana I can pop you for trying to steal one of my lawn gnomes.

My sheriff would give me a box of ammo and thank me for saving him the excessive paperwork.


https://www.ballisticink.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/BallisticInk_IV8888_RoofKoreanNoLootNoShoot_Women_Tshirt_Black_CloseUp.jpg

and they were never going to rape anybody.

Fucking right they weren't....we made sure of it.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Sure I do....it's even totally legal in most if not all red states and even some more moderate blue ones.

Hell at my spot in Montana I can pop you for trying to steal one of my lawn gnomes.

My sheriff would give me a box of ammo and thank me for saving the paperwork.





Fucking right they weren't.

*chuckles*

Good day for Lit to be acting up on holding log in's......

Ummm sorry BoBo, you go to jail for shooting a person for theft in Montana....

You may not use deadly force to stop theft. The use of force likely to cause death or serious bodily harm is justified only if the person reasonably believes that the force is necessary to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.

You are such a fucking liar.......*chuckles*, now have nice day ....

Montana does not have any codified protection from liability for justifiable self-defense. That means you could potentially be sued if you shoot someone in self-defense.


https://www.frontiercarry.org/self-defense-mt.html

 

[pecksniff]

Sure I do....it's even totally legal in most if not all red states and even some more moderate blue ones. With more going constitutional carry/CD/SYG every month it seems lately.

Only if so provided by statute in derogation of the common law, which does not allow use of deadly force to protect property. You'd better check with a lawyer before you ever act on that assumption.

 

[CornusKousa]

*chuckles*

Good day for Lit to be acting up on holding log in's......

Ummm sorry BoBo, you go to jail for shooting a person for theft in Montana....

You may not use deadly force to stop theft. The use of force likely to cause death or serious bodily harm is justified only if the person reasonably believes that the force is necessary to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.

You are such a fucking liar.......*chuckles*, now have nice day ....

Montana does not have any codified protection from liability for justifiable self-defense. That means you could potentially be sued if you shoot someone in self-defense.

GTA is a felony no??

Oh well, good thing I have heavy equipment!!

BTW, dead people don't sue.

 

[CornusKousa]

Only if so provided by statute in derogation of the common law, which does not allow use of deadly force to protect property. You'd better check with a lawyer before you ever act on that assumption.

Law?? PFFFT!!! LOL who cares about that anymore??

It's a joke.

So I'm not too worried about it.

 

[Rightguide]

GTA is a felony no??

Oh well, good thing I have heavy equipment!!

BTW, dead people don't sue.

The only thing left standing for them is the rap sheet and toe tag.

 

[CornusKousa]

The only thing left standing for them is the rap sheet and toe tag.

"IDK....I asked him what he was doing and he came at me. When I saw the pistol in his hand I was just SOOOO scared I had to stand over him, re-load and crank off another 15 rounds!!"



Or maybe it all goes down at 1am and nobody sees anything.

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/ActualDopeyBandicoot-max-1mb.gif

 

[Lazaran]

.
One Bullet BoBo changed the subject about repelling a BLM bus invasion with Sheriff Andy in record time.

It makes me wonder if that BLM bus invasion of Mayberry Minnesota ever really happened.

LMFAOOOOOOOO

 

[Cubantripod]

*chuckles*

Good day for Lit to be acting up on holding log in's......

Ummm sorry BoBo, you go to jail for shooting a person for theft in Montana....

You may not use deadly force to stop theft. The use of force likely to cause death or serious bodily harm is justified only if the person reasonably believes that the force is necessary to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.

You are such a fucking liar.......*chuckles*, now have nice day ....

Montana does not have any codified protection from liability for justifiable self-defense. That means you could potentially be sued if you shoot someone in self-defense.


https://www.frontiercarry.org/self-defense-mt.html

Self-defense is an affirmative defense. An affirmative defense is a legal excuse. You're saying "yes I did it, but I have a good reason" that law accepts. Affirmative defenses also work in civil cases.