LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Nipples

Preferred Colour of (f) nipple

  • light pink

    Votes: 2,876 32.0%

  • dark pink

    Votes: 2,465 27.5%

  • light brown

    Votes: 2,119 23.6%

  • dark brown

    Votes: 1,518 16.9%
  • Total voters
    8,978
Status
Not open for further replies.
NondescriptInCT said:
Folks, I apologize in up front for both the length of the following and the fact that it has nothing to do with our treasured nipples. After doing a little research on the Internet as a result of my (shared) frustration over the site's recent censorship, I wanted to vent a little...
Click to expand...

Mutt, the pics you and some other distinguished nipplesters posted of old Playboy pinup vixens were pre 1990. Are they still around?

(Re: Title 18, Part I, Chapter 110, section 2257, paragraph (a) states
Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, or other matter which—
(1) contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct; and)

As noted from another post on this page, there was a sweep executed recently by Lit., similar to the one now in progress. I’m questioning the ability (or limitations) of the sweepees. When I submitted my last story to Lit. I was shocked (ego bruising) to have it rejected. Upon drilling into the system for an explanation, the reason given was the story was read by ‘bots’ and they had picked up the mention of being 12 years old and experiencing my first kiss. In its wisdom it classified this act as under age sex and was immediately rejected. (Note: I did reword it and it was accepted.) With that in mind, I wonder if they are letting the bots loose with the 2257 mission, and their limited capabilities are producing this erroneous havoc. I agree, I think Lit is overreacting.

All this said and done THE NIPPLE THREAD SHALL LIVE ON…no matter how quickly (many) they remove our pictures. The spirit is here, the connections have been made…we are family

…and momma has spoken. :kiss:
 
Yayyyy!

JenniferMidnight said:
Mutt, the pics you and some other distinguished nipplesters posted of old Playboy pinup vixens were pre 1990. Are they still around?

(Re: Title 18, Part I, Chapter 110, section 2257, paragraph (a) states
Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, or other matter which—
(1) contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct; and)

As noted from another post on this page, there was a sweep executed recently by Lit., similar to the one now in progress. I’m questioning the ability (or limitations) of the sweepees. When I submitted my last story to Lit. I was shocked (ego bruising) to have it rejected. Upon drilling into the system for an explanation, the reason given was the story was read by ‘bots’ and they had picked up the mention of being 12 years old and experiencing my first kiss. In its wisdom it classified this act as under age sex and was immediately rejected. (Note: I did reword it and it was accepted.) With that in mind, I wonder if they are letting the bots loose with the 2257 mission, and their limited capabilities are producing this erroneous havoc. I agree, I think Lit is overreacting.

All this said and done THE NIPPLE THREAD SHALL LIVE ON…no matter how quickly (many) they remove our pictures. The spirit is here, the connections have been made…we are family

…and momma has spoken. :kiss:
Click to expand...
Long live the nipple thread. And Momma.

Jim
 
Hey, Mutt, regarding this sentence in you sigline: "There are no heterosexuals in foxholes."

I would bet that most of the men who are in foxes' holes are heterosexuals.
 
JenniferMidnight said:
Mutt, the pics you and some other distinguished nipplesters posted of old Playboy pinup vixens were pre 1990. Are they still around?

(Re: Title 18, Part I, Chapter 110, section 2257, paragraph (a) states
Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, or other matter which—
(1) contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct; and)

As noted from another post on this page, there was a sweep executed recently by Lit., similar to the one now in progress. I’m questioning the ability (or limitations) of the sweepees. When I submitted my last story to Lit. I was shocked (ego bruising) to have it rejected. Upon drilling into the system for an explanation, the reason given was the story was read by ‘bots’ and they had picked up the mention of being 12 years old and experiencing my first kiss. In its wisdom it classified this act as under age sex and was immediately rejected. (Note: I did reword it and it was accepted.) With that in mind, I wonder if they are letting the bots loose with the 2257 mission, and their limited capabilities are producing this erroneous havoc. I agree, I think Lit is overreacting.

All this said and done THE NIPPLE THREAD SHALL LIVE ON…no matter how quickly (many) they remove our pictures. The spirit is here, the connections have been made…we are family

…and momma has spoken. :kiss:
Click to expand...

You're right, dammit.

Since this is Friday again (TGIF) here are some suggrstions of ways you might want to spend your weekend:
 
Boxlicker101 said:
Hey, Mutt, regarding this sentence in you sigline: "There are no heterosexuals in foxholes."

I would bet that most of the men who are in foxes' holes are heterosexuals.
Click to expand...
My sig line is meant to point out the absurdity of the "no atheists in foxholes" canard that I heard someone quote today.
 
The Mutt said:
My sig line is meant to point out the absurdity of the "no atheists in foxholes" canard that I heard someone quote today.
Click to expand...

I understood the point and appreciated it. However, an uncle (WWll vet) who was as mean, rotten a son of a bitch as could be found, once bellowed, "Don't talk to me of atheists; I've watched them die." Having been spared the foxhole, I can't comment. However, I have seen a lot of what I think of as presentence conversions and a lot of scared praying that appeared to offer no peace.

By the way, since you seem to be done with it, may I have "Are you a Republican or do you hate Jesus?"
 
iansearchof said:
I understood the point and appreciated it. However, an uncle (WWll vet) who was as mean, rotten a son of a bitch as could be found, once bellowed, "Don't talk to me of atheists; I've watched them die." Having been spared the foxhole, I can't comment. However, I have seen a lot of what I think of as presentence conversions and a lot of scared praying that appeared to offer no peace.

By the way, since you seem to be done with it, may I have "Are you a Republican or do you hate Jesus?"
Click to expand...
Sure. I'd be proud.
 
The Mutt said:
Sure. I'd be proud.
Click to expand...

10/Q.

JenniMid,
While I'm here...for a long time I've been wanting to tell how breathtaking I find your AV. Unfortunately, looking at it took away my words.
 
iansearchof said:
10/Q.

JenniMid,
While I'm here...for a long time I've been wanting to tell how breathtaking I find your AV. Unfortunately, looking at it took away my words.
Click to expand...

Hopefully, it will get better. Periodically, The delightful lady does a slow strip :p tease and we all eagerly watch to see what comes off next and how far she goes. :) I would say we watch with 'bated breath but that would be silly. She takes weeks to reach the finale and if we held our breath that long, we would all be dead. :D
 
Foxholes

Boxlicker101 said:
Hey, Mutt, regarding this sentence in you sigline: "There are no heterosexuals in foxholes."

I would bet that most of the men who are in foxes' holes are heterosexuals.
Click to expand...
I always thought that if I had to be in a foxhole in a war, I would prefer somebody in there who loved the hell out of me. Think of King Leonidas and the Three Hundred at Thermopylae.

Jim
 
Thank you

Bill Dada said:
Some more BBs for kwas. I she was the inspiration for my first wet dream and many that followed.

http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c155/Billdada1/Done/Celebs/Bardot03.jpg
http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c155/Billdada1/Done/Celebs/bardot17.jpg
http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c155/Billdada1/Done/Celebs/bardot14.jpg
http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c155/Billdada1/Done/Celebs/bardot13.jpg
Click to expand...
You are a prince among men, Mr. Dada. Let's take Brigitte to a foxhole and screw the hell out of her.

Jim
 
kwas1modem said:
You are a prince among men, Mr. Dada. Let's take Brigitte to a foxhole and screw the hell out of her.

Jim
Click to expand...

She was one of the sexiest women of the fifties and sixties. I saw a current pic of her not long ago and she's still pretty hot.
 
I'm with you JenM.

JenniferMidnight said:
Mutt, the pics you and some other distinguished nipplesters posted of old Playboy pinup vixens were pre 1990. Are they still around?

(Re: Title 18, Part I, Chapter 110, section 2257, paragraph (a) states
Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, or other matter which—
(1) contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of actual sexually explicit conduct; and)

As noted from another post on this page, there was a sweep executed recently by Lit., similar to the one now in progress. I’m questioning the ability (or limitations) of the sweepees. When I submitted my last story to Lit. I was shocked (ego bruising) to have it rejected. Upon drilling into the system for an explanation, the reason given was the story was read by ‘bots’ and they had picked up the mention of being 12 years old and experiencing my first kiss. In its wisdom it classified this act as under age sex and was immediately rejected. (Note: I did reword it and it was accepted.) With that in mind, I wonder if they are letting the bots loose with the 2257 mission, and their limited capabilities are producing this erroneous havoc. I agree, I think Lit is overreacting.

All this said and done THE NIPPLE THREAD SHALL LIVE ON…no matter how quickly (many) they remove our pictures. The spirit is here, the connections have been made…we are family

…and momma has spoken. :kiss:
Click to expand...

Abso..bloody..lutely. Of course, if we all posted our own pics they couldn't delete them. Which brings me back to photos and tan lines(or lack of them)????!! Now who owes us a few of them?? ;)

Then again, I don't think there would be a great rush of interest to see my nipples! :D
 
Fantasymaster said:
Abso..bloody..lutely. Of course, if we all posted our own pics they couldn't delete them. Which brings me back to photos and tan lines(or lack of them)????!! Now who owes us a few of them?? ;)

Then again, I don't think there would be a great rush of interest to see my nipples! :D
Click to expand...

Yeah, what he said :nana:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

TheWritingGroup
"Pranked", a tale of jokes, family, friends, and sex slavery
Replies
3
Views
885
TheWritingGroup
TheWritingGroup
TheWritingGroup
Unicorn: How it came out that way
Replies
0
Views
485
TheWritingGroup
TheWritingGroup
TheWritingGroup
Wager: Director Commentary
Replies
4
Views
674
TheWritingGroup
TheWritingGroup
8letters
  • Locked
Extended Author Notes for "Are My Brother And Sister Lovers?"
Replies
13
Views
2K
Sammael Bard
Sammael Bard
secretLace
Survivor 26 - Rules and Registration thread (read first)
Replies
13
Views
627
talemestories
talemestories
Back
Top