My initial thought were that it was going to have a massive impact, and possibly take away some people's reason to visit the forums
I agree.
If they insist, I'll delete my pics from the "Dicks Of Lit Slideshow" possibly...
I think it is unwarranted. We are all adults here and come to this site of our own free will. Some to post photos, both nudes and non nudes. and some to view he photos and maybe comment and gain new friends. Very lovely legs by the way. I like your stockings
I've pretty much stopped visiting all together and not posted a pic for awhile. When I do visit I'm here for 5 minutes then gone.
Who??
All I'm gonna say on that is #MakeOrwellFictionAgain
Just wanted to address this here, as I’ve done so on Discord. Multiple people messaged me with concerns about SSH and her hubby, and one sent a screenshot with a Google reverse image search that identified him as a stage actor with the initials O.O. They were both kind enough to video chat with me, and for what it’s worth, I am 100% satisfied that they are indeed the same people in the pics they’ve posted and will personally vouch for them. They are lovely people and IMO, it’s a testament to her beauty and his sculpted cheekbones and skill with photography/retouching that so many people thought someone that looks like her couldn’t possibly enjoy chatting with us pervs and weirdos. She is indeed a sweetheart
That's the thing. The post that first let us know this was coming alluded to "overwhelming feedback" from people who claimed that it was an issue when people peeked over their shoulder, but no one who I've seen comment on it since then remembers being asked, let alone giving that sort of feedback. The circumstances surrounding this change are murky at best, deceptive at worst and site leadership has, as far as I'm aware, done nothing to clear things up.
Well, now isn't that just clear as mud. No definitions regarding what may or may not be allowed. I do know that the current workaround for more edgy/explicit images is off-site hosting. If Lit is serious about banning nude images on their own servers, that's one thing. But Lit would have to ban all off-site links, regardless of content. Like I said, until something is announced in the AmPics Index, I don't see how contributors would know anything about this.
. I was just providing the link.
It's a purge - nothing more, nothing less!
I’ll sum it up simply. If it prevents Stiletto from posting pictures, I am against it. Period.
