Never Stop talking About This

[Rightguide]

Pam Bondi to get on this case right after she's done with Epstein files.

So we're told.

 

[Rightguide]

All of this could be said about the conspiracy theory in your OP.

What conspiracy "theory" was expressed in the OP? A set of unanswered facts was presented with a stated desire to keep the dialogue going. You're the one who presented a "conspiracy theory."

 

[ll74]

What conspiracy "theory" was expressed in the OP? A set of unanswered facts was presented with a stated desire to keep the dialogue going. You're the one who presented a "conspiracy theory."

So you don't understand that the "unanswered questions" were geared towards a conspiracy theory?

Lol ...

 

[Typo Fu Master]

The Secret Service wouldn't -- but the Trump campaign would. And they would not need the SS' cooperation.

Where are you getting such accurate intel?
What leads you to believe this?

 

[Politruk]

What conspiracy "theory" was expressed in the OP? A set of unanswered facts was presented with a stated desire to keep the dialogue going. You're the one who presented a "conspiracy theory."

Just Asking Questions:

"Just Asking Questions" (JAQ; known derisively as "JAQing off")[a] is a pseudoskeptical tactic often used by conspiracy theorists to present false or distorted claims by framing them as questions. If criticized, the proponent of such a claim may then defend themselves by asserting they were merely asking questions which may upset the mainstream consensus.[2][3][4] The name of the tactic is therefore derived from the typical response of "I'm not saying it was necessarily a conspiracy; I'm just asking questions."[5] In The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe, Steven Novella distinguishes JAQ from scientific skepticism by explaining that:[6]

[W]hen true scientists ask a question, they want an answer and will give due consideration to any possibilities. Deniers, on the other hand, will ask the same undermining questions over and over, long after they have been definitively answered. The questions—used to cast doubt—are all they are interested in, not the process of discovery they're meant to inspire.

An early usage of the tactic can be found in Bertrand Russell's essay 16 Questions on the Assassination, which insinuated that American president John F. Kennedy was assassinated by someone other than Lee Harvey Oswald.[4][7] JAQ as a tactic to justify pseudoarcheological claims was popularized by the Swiss author Erich von Däniken and the American TV show Ancient Aliens,[2][3] and became further prevalent with the rise of the internet.[4]

 

[Baztrachian]

The state of mental health services in the US is in a dire state.

True.

 

[Typo Fu Master]

Just Asking Questions:

"Just Asking Questions" (JAQ; known derisively as "JAQing off")[a] is a pseudoskeptical tactic often used by conspiracy theorists to present false or distorted claims by framing them as questions. If criticized, the proponent of such a claim may then defend themselves by asserting they were merely asking questions which may upset the mainstream consensus.[2][3][4] The name of the tactic is therefore derived from the typical response of "I'm not saying it was necessarily a conspiracy; I'm just asking questions."[5] In The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe, Steven Novella distinguishes JAQ from scientific skepticism by explaining that:[6]


An early usage of the tactic can be found in Bertrand Russell's essay 16 Questions on the Assassination, which insinuated that American president John F. Kennedy was assassinated by someone other than Lee Harvey Oswald.[4][7] JAQ as a tactic to justify pseudoarcheological claims was popularized by the Swiss author Erich von Däniken and the American TV show Ancient Aliens,[2][3] and became further prevalent with the rise of the internet.[4]

The first post contains no questions. Jus' sayin'.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Never stop talking about this

Joe Rogan and Elon Musk point out the INSANE details surrounding the Butler, Pennsylvania Donald Trump assassination attempt shooter

– The assassins house was PROFESSIONALLY scrubbed
– His home was scrubbed so well there wasn’t even silverware left in the home
– No footprint on the internet
– No social media footprint (completely wiped)
– He was in a BlackRock commercial
– Joe Rogan says some individuals inside BlackRock may have “recognized that it’s beneficial to them if he gets assassinated”
– There was never a formal report
– There was never press conferences where they detailed all the information they know currently and where the investigation stands at the moment
– He was a very young g kid there with a rangefinder (used to measure distances, very suspicious)
– CNN streamed it live, which Joe Rogan does not believe they did for any other rally. And certainly not for a rally that’s in the middle of nowhere in Pennsylvania
– They wouldn’t let people be on that roof because the Secret service lady said it was sloped and it was dangerous
– The snipers that were on the other roof was a, a steeper pitch (It made no f*cking sense)
– Random people saw him and pointed him out on the roof with a gun for a long time before it happened
– The kid had 5 phones
– His body was immediately cremated
– There was some indications that there was a phone that had been traveling from outside the FBI offices in D.C to where this kid lived multiple times

We need answers.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1916646512005968064

lol, well if joe rogan and elmo musk say so.

Never stop reminding righguide what a twit he is.

 

[Bray123]

True.

View attachment 2533687

https://metro.co.uk/video/trump-id-like-pope-3424799/

 

[Baztrachian]

Non sequitur.

 

[DeluxAuto]

True.

View attachment 2533687

Your meme fails hard. If you're too ignorant to know why, you shouldn't have posted it.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

What conspiracy "theory" was expressed in the OP? A set of unanswered facts was presented with a stated desire to keep the dialogue going. You're the one who presented a "conspiracy theory."

I am keeping the dialogue going. Every suspicious thing in your OP can be explained by the assassination attempt being staged by Trump himself.

 

[Politruk]

The first post contains no questions. Jus' sayin'.

It contains no question marks, but it contains nothing but questions -- every line that purports to be a statement ends with an invisible but unmistakable "So how do you explain this?"

 

[Politruk]

True.

View attachment 2533687

Hitler Age Sugar!

 

[Typo Fu Master]

It contains no question marks, but it contains nothing but questions -- every line that purports to be a statement ends with an invisible but unmistakable "So how do you explain this?"

I saw nothing but statements.

 

[Politruk]

I saw nothing but statements.

You're lying.

 

[Rotadom]

The state of mental health services in the US is in a dire state.

True.

View attachment 2533687

https://metro.co.uk/video/trump-id-like-pope-3424799/

Non sequitur.

Lol. Baz needs to learn the words he uses what get branded a hypocrite.

 

[Politruk]

You can keep "talking about this" for another ten years, and nothing more than was known the first week will ever come out.

 

[Rightguide]

Where are you getting such accurate intel?
What leads you to believe this?

He has easy access to his ass.

 

[Politruk]

He has easy access to his ass.

You can keep "talking about this" for another ten years, and nothing more than was known the first week will ever come out. You know this.