https://justthenews.com/government/...rral&utm_medium=offthepress&utm_campaign=home
they will never release it, who will make them release it?
they will never release it, who will make them release it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Chairman of the Oversight Committee can go to federal court and have a lawful subpoena enforced if it is refused by the National Archives. They have the power to use inherent contempt but it hasn't been used in modern times, but it does exist. If Congress can't subpoena the Executive Branch then Congress is not a co-equal branch of government.https://justthenews.com/government/...rral&utm_medium=offthepress&utm_campaign=home
they will never release it, who will make them release it?
So what? Who will enforce it?The Chairman of the Oversight Committee can go to federal court and have a lawful subpoena enforced if it is refused by the National Archives.
Nobody said he was smart.CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY: Joe Biden sent at least 5,400 pseudonymous emails as VP.
Related: Joe Biden’s email aliases reveal truth behind aw-shucks facade. “The only reason to run such an account is to make sure that the emails don’t get archived in official systems and aren’t available under the Freedom of Information Act, and to keep the communications out of the reach of critics, and possibly law enforcement.”
Were they even asked? No!Has the White House offered an explanation for why POTUS did this?
Maybe they’ll say the fake names were used to talk about the weather.Were they even asked? No!
Executive privilege.Has the White House offered an explanation for why POTUS did this?
Are these answers that have come from the WH, or your guesses? The items you list might be used to argue that POTUS (and those who addressed him using fake names) have the right to do so, but it doesn’t explain why they felt the need to do it.Executive privilege.
National security.
Separation of powers.
First Amendment.
Bing bong, they’re all classified now.
wedding plans and yoga instructionsMaybe they’ll say the fake names were used to talk about the weather.
"Dear Ms. Hermann:
This letter is in response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated June 9, 2022 for access to Biden Vice Presidential records pertaining to all emails from the accounts of robinware456@gmail.com, JRBWare@gmail.com and Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov
preserved through the National Archives and Records Administration.
Your request was received by the Archival Operations Division on June 9, 2022. FOIA requests for Biden Vice Presidential records are processed and reviewed for access under provisions of the 1978 Presidential Records Act, as amended (PRA) (44 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2209), which incorporates the Freedom of Information Act (5U.S.C. § 552) in substantial part.
We have performed a search of our collection for Vice Presidential records related to your request and have identified approximately 5,138 email messages, 25 electronic files and 200 pages of potentially responsive records that must be processed in order to respond to your request.
Please keep in mind that these totals are an estimate and that all material processed may not be applicable to your specific topic.The staff of the Archival Operations Division is currently processing and reviewing FOIA requests"
So when I read this request, it seems Ms. Hermann has supplied the email address's, not that the NARA claimed they are Bidens.
They further state, that they have 5,138 emails 25 electronic files and 200 pages that may match records. Which means when they search Biden*robinware* for example, they got a "hit". That hit doesn't mean an email from or to Biden.
Fuck you guys are so damn gullible!!
https://www.slfliberty.org/wp-conte.../08/20230828-Complaint-Exhibit-4-Doc.-1-4.pdf
A simple explanation from the WH could be that President Biden has never used a pseudonym or authorized use of a pseudonym to hide his identity in email correspondence. I haven’t heard any type of explanation at this point. It’s possible they have issued an explanation that I haven’t seen covered in the press."Dear Ms. Hermann:
This letter is in response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated June 9, 2022 for access to Biden Vice Presidential records pertaining to all emails from the accounts of robinware456@gmail.com, JRBWare@gmail.com and Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov
preserved through the National Archives and Records Administration.
Your request was received by the Archival Operations Division on June 9, 2022. FOIA requests for Biden Vice Presidential records are processed and reviewed for access under provisions of the 1978 Presidential Records Act, as amended (PRA) (44 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2209), which incorporates the Freedom of Information Act (5U.S.C. § 552) in substantial part.
We have performed a search of our collection for Vice Presidential records related to your request and have identified approximately 5,138 email messages, 25 electronic files and 200 pages of potentially responsive records that must be processed in order to respond to your request.
Please keep in mind that these totals are an estimate and that all material processed may not be applicable to your specific topic.The staff of the Archival Operations Division is currently processing and reviewing FOIA requests"
So when I read this request, it seems Ms. Hermann has supplied the email address's, not that the NARA claimed they are Bidens.
They further state, that they have 5,138 emails 25 electronic files and 200 pages that may match records. Which means when they search Biden*robinware* for example, they got a "hit". That hit doesn't mean an email from or to Biden.
Fuck you guys are so damn gullible!!
https://www.slfliberty.org/wp-conte.../08/20230828-Complaint-Exhibit-4-Doc.-1-4.pdf
Some guy calling himself John Baron.Are these answers that have come from the WH, or your guesses? The items you list might be used to argue that POTUS (and those who addressed him using fake names) have the right to do so, but it doesn’t explain why they felt the need to do it.
Or, it's possible the White House isn't even aware of the request. I do wonder how many FOIR's they get a day,about the most obscure shit imaginable? I know if was at the helm I wouldn't be wasting other peoples times about FOIR requests.A simple explanation from the WH could be that President Biden has never used a pseudonym or authorized use of a pseudonym to hide his identity in email correspondence. I haven’t heard any type of explanation at this point. It’s possible they have issued an explanation that I haven’t seen covered in the press.
Maybe they’ll say the fake names were used to talk about the weather.
It’s been reported by dozens of national news outlets.Or, it's possible the White House isn't even aware of the request. I do wonder how many FOIR's they get a day,about the most obscure shit imaginable? I know if was at the helm I wouldn't be wasting other peoples times about FOIR requests.
Good point. Biden’s 20+ speakerphone conversations and dinners with Hunter’s business associates were discussions about the weather. Maybe fake names are needed for emails when the subject pertains to weather.When meteorologists trump talked about the weather he used maps and magic markers. Thank gawd we had a Prez that could do everything himself.
So are you saying the President ( no matter which one) should always be involved in FOIR's with the NA.It’s been reported by dozens of national news outlets.
And to your question, yes I’m a small government Republican. T
Has nothing to do with expanding the size and scope of government. It is odd and unusual for a Vice President to use pseudonyms in email correspondence. The president could clarify things by simply declaring whether did or didn’t, and if he did, just explain the purpose.So are you saying the President ( no matter which one) should always be involved in FOIR's with the NA.
If so, then this post of yours below
is pretty redundant. Since you're demanding to increase the work of the Office of the President.
He could, or he could keep fuck twits such as yourself dangling. Now if I was there, I'm thinking I'd have way more important duties to deal with.Has nothing to do with expanding the size and scope of government. It is odd and unusual for a Vice President to use pseudonyms in email correspondence. The president could clarify things by simply declaring whether did or didn’t, and if he did, just explain the purpose.