N Korea warns US of pre-emptive action

Frimost

Now 40% more Lesbianism!
Joined
Nov 28, 2001
Posts
6,706
_38784473_ap300march.jpg


North Korea has warned the United States that any decision to send more troops to the Korean peninsular could lead it to make a pre-emptive attack on American forces.

The threat to strike first against US troops in the region came from North Korea's foreign ministry deputy director, Kim Pyong Gap.

North Korea threatens invasion
 
Yet, we WILL go into Korea. Bush is not onl;y a FUCKING idiot, he's a warmonger. And, Korea could,(&, I think will,)use teh weapons it already has, on us. So, this time next year,(counting Iraq,)that would probably make nearly a million Americans dead, all cause of one guy who has teh brain on a 2 month old.
 
nasty1 said:
Yet, we WILL go into Korea. Bush is not onl;y a FUCKING idiot, he's a warmonger. And, Korea could,(&, I think will,)use teh weapons it already has, on us. So, this time next year,(counting Iraq,)that would probably make nearly a million Americans dead, all cause of one guy who has teh brain on a 2 month old.

Hey, except for the excessive hyperbole, spelling and grammar mistakes, and a bizarre Madame Cleo-like attempt at predicting the future, that was an impressive post.
 
That only shows what morons you both are. A MILLION dead?! That is basically our entire active armed forces, Army, Navy, Marines, and Airforce.

Lit posters suck at military affairs, don't even comment if you know nothing about military issues.

In all of WWII we only incurred 292,100 KIA's out of a force of 14,900,000 troops.
 
Last edited:
Frimost said:
That only shows what morons you both are. A MILLION dead?! That is basically our entire armed forces, Army, Navy, Marines, and Airforce.

Lit posters suck at military affairs, don't even comment if you know nothing about military issues.

In all of WWII we only incured 292,100 KIA's out of a force of 14,900,000 troops.

Hey frimost, do everyone a favor and fuck off. I was basically calling him an idiot, you idiot.

See why nobody likes you? Even when people aren't fighting you, you can't figure out how to act.


P.S. douchebag: just because you can google stats doesn't make you a military expert. Grow up.
 
Hey frimost, do everyone a favor and fuck off. I was basically calling him an idiot, you idiot.

See why nobody likes you? Even when people aren't fighting you, you can't figure out how to act.


P.S. douchebag: just because you can google stats doesn't make you a military expert. Grow up.

Well in that case I'm sorry PC.
And they are not "googled", in fact I did not even get them off the Internet at all.
 
Frimost said:
Well in that case I'm sorry PC.
And they are not "googled", in fact I did not even get them off the Internet at all.


I'll be graceful this time and just say "apology accepted".

I don't really care where you go to get your numbers. I respect the fact that you're a smart guy and military hardware is a passion of yours. The point is that you have a habit of wanting to win every argument so badly that you tend to try and drown people in statistics, and it gets tedious after a while.

Having been in the military and knowing a little bit about training and morale, etc., I know there is more to a fight than the sheer numbers of troops, cannons, planes and tanks. Everyone thought Soviet tanks were badass...right up until they met the M1A1, for example.

Just an observation.
 
Granted...And North Korea and Iraq all use shoddy Soviet tanks, older models at that (North Korea's front-line tank is the T-62 and the number in the designation indicates the date the design entered production).
 
Frimost said:
Granted...And North Korea and Iraq all use shoddy Soviet tanks, older models at that (North Korea's front-line tank is the T-62 and the number in the designation indicates the date the design entered production).

That was my point. I wouldn't call the Iraqi T-72's "shoddy", but everyone except the U.S. army seemed to think they could give the M1 a fight. They turned out to be no match. Obviously the T-62 is much less a threat than the 72.
 
That was my point. I wouldn't call the Iraqi T-72's "shoddy", but everyone except the U.S. army seemed to think they could give the M1 a fight. They turned out to be no match. Obviously the T-62 is much less a threat than the 72.

The Taliban had T-62's as well; it didn't seem to do them much good either. A very old tank, but not crappy enough to fall asleep when one is about, they could sneak up from behind and take an M-1 out at close range with a shot to the back of the turret where the armor is thinner like our M-4 Sherman's did to German Tiger tanks in WW2.

The T-72 is pretty crappy, it uses an autoloader for the gun that is so unsafe it has been known to tear the arms off of crew members and stuff them in the bore of the tube like it was a shell. The ammunition is all stored in the crew compartment so when penetrated by an anti-tank round the secondary explosion is so catastrophic that the whole turret has been known to pop off the tank 30-feet into the air!
 
Frimost said:
The Taliban had T-62's as well; it didn't seem to do them much good either. A very old tank, but not crappy enough to fall asleep when one is about, they could sneak up from behind and take an M-1 out at close range with a shot to the back of the turret where the armor is thinner like our M-4 Sherman's did to German Tiger tanks in WW2.

They would never, ever get that close. Between aerial surveillance and ground radar, and thermal imaging sights we see them miles away, and then kill them miles away. If I'm remembering right the M1A1/A2 has a range of something like 4000 meters with something like a 95% first hit percentage.

Thermal imaging sights are like long distance TV. I was sitting in an M1A1 one night, looking through the sight at an APC that had just stopped after a long road march. I could see every hot bearing in the wheels. I could see the faint heat signature of pistons in the engine- through the 1.5" thick aluminum alloy armor and through the engine firewall which is about 3/8" aluminum.

That's why we fight so well at night. To everyone else it's night, but to us it's just like a watching Tv in a dark room.
 
Last edited:
t62-1.jpg


A T-62 main battle tank, 115mm main gun and 242mm of frontal armor.

t62.jpg
 
Re: Re: N Korea warns US of pre-emptive action

teddybear4play said:
"If you do not stand down, we will all Riverdance!"

Oh, you mean this isn't a caption thread?

Well.

Fuck.

TB4p
:D :D :D
 
Frimost.
Key-Wrrrrist. (christ)
You must have a very small penis.
Poor little fellow.
 
Yes, they wish to engage in nuclear war.

They will launch their three and hope and pray we don't shoot them down (like we've announced our total capability) and feel confident that they can withstand our 30 launches...

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
Statistically speaking, even a monkey is correct every now and then.
So you are finally coming out of the closet to admit to me and the world that you are indeed a little globis monkey? That's right girl, you are right every once in a blue moon, that's the spirit! :)
 
Man, you hairy like a motherfuckin monkey!
No wonder you sound like the neanderthal man.
"Ooga booga, war GOOD. Kill GOOD. America so tough! Ooga booga!!!"
Fuckwit!
 
Man, you hairy like a motherfuckin monkey!

It's called being a man, having body hair is inherent with being male, so why don't you sit down and shut up you little bitch.
 
Back
Top