Sunadmire
Experienced
- Joined
- May 6, 2018
- Posts
- 48
I'm in two minds about the amount of detail I want to wrovide:
Background:
I've completed Chapter 5 (of 8) of a new series I'm working on. It still needs refinement.
Towards the end of this chapter (the first part is a build-up to this) the Main male character (MMC) impregnates his previous lover (A - twice), A's sister-in-law (B - once) and his faithfull and unsuspecting wife (C - twice) in ahort succession.
I've written very little of the detail of these events. e.g.:
I may stop at the point where the MMC's erection enters B's soaking wet pussy. Then continues where the MMC got dressed up while B was still laying on her back, with semen seeping out of her pussy, hoping to get as much sperm through her cervix before she cleans herself up.
My motivation to restrict the detail, is because I (hope that I have) left enough flesh so that the reader can fill in the missing detail. An expansion of the detail (in all five cases) may end up to contain a lot of similar action, which readers may find boring.
I'm now double guessing the wisdom to leave the action to the imagination of the reader. I can probably spice the action up by providing more detail.
Any ideas as to which way to go, or how to mix the two strategies.
Sun
Background:
I've completed Chapter 5 (of 8) of a new series I'm working on. It still needs refinement.
Towards the end of this chapter (the first part is a build-up to this) the Main male character (MMC) impregnates his previous lover (A - twice), A's sister-in-law (B - once) and his faithfull and unsuspecting wife (C - twice) in ahort succession.
I've written very little of the detail of these events. e.g.:
I may stop at the point where the MMC's erection enters B's soaking wet pussy. Then continues where the MMC got dressed up while B was still laying on her back, with semen seeping out of her pussy, hoping to get as much sperm through her cervix before she cleans herself up.
My motivation to restrict the detail, is because I (hope that I have) left enough flesh so that the reader can fill in the missing detail. An expansion of the detail (in all five cases) may end up to contain a lot of similar action, which readers may find boring.
I'm now double guessing the wisdom to leave the action to the imagination of the reader. I can probably spice the action up by providing more detail.
Any ideas as to which way to go, or how to mix the two strategies.
Sun