Menstrual Cycle Weakens Mental Capacity, Should Avoid Making “Crucial Decisions”…

[Busybody]

Women’s Menstrual Cycle Weakens Mental Capacity, Should Avoid Making “Crucial Decisions”…

 

[Tryharder62]

 

[Busybody]

You talkin to me?

 

[Tryharder62]

I hope you made that up because that is hogwash! Plus I am bored and looking up pictures of PMS is killing the time. This is funny.

http://t3.***********/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRivZE6CqSpM0HB_uBiGAmq27RlthrZLAT8E9164h8wp9nK2K_DPgVeVO03-g

 

[Tryharder62]

Tee hee!

 

[MatthewVett]

Women’s Menstrual Cycle Weakens Mental Capacity, Should Avoid Making “Crucial Decisions”…

[Citation Needed]

 

[Busybody]

Wahhabi University: Women’s Menstrual Cycle Weakens Mental Capacity, Should Avoid Making “Crucial Decisions”…




And who doesn’t get their scientific advice from 7th century Wahhabi Islamists?

Via Emirates 24/7:


Women should avoid taking crucial decisions in the last phase of their menstrual cycle as it affects their mental capabilities, according to a Saudi university.

The study by two professors, including a woman, at Umm Al Qura university in the western Saudi town of Makkah found that women’s mental powers do not fully function during the last 13 days of their monthly period.

Authored by Dr Ranya Al Faran and Dr Abed Rabbo Suleiman, the study found that the menstrual cycle weakens the woman’s “ability for the production of ideas, planning, strategies, organization, initiatives and self control.”

“Women are advised not to take any crucial decisions in the last phase of their menstrual cycle as a result of the changes and emotions that arise during that period,” said the study, published in the Saudi daily Al-Watan.

It said women’s monthly period is normally divided into three parts, the last of which lasts for around 13 days. “During these 13 days, women are advised to avert taking any serious and crucial decisions as their mental abilities are not fully functioning.”

 

[Tryharder62]

I would love to see the testing procedure they used to conclude that.

 

[Busybody]

go to SA and ask em

 

[Busybody]

 

[Busybody]

did you get the citation, DUMMY?

 

[kbate]

ffs.


.

 

[Busybody]

ffs.


.

I agree with the Wahhabi University comments

And

Further

This is yet another reason WOMEN shouldn't be allowed to vote

Their "judgment" is impaired and or warped

 

[kbate]

I agree with the Wahhabi University comments

And

Further

This is yet another reason WOMEN shouldn't be allowed to vote

Their "judgment" is impaired and or warped

WahU would agree with you on that as well. You're a lot closer to them than your threads indicate.

 

[Busybody]

WahU would agree with you on that as well. You're a lot closer to them than your threads indicate.

reality is

that study after study, election after election, decade after decade


show

that women base their vote on look, dress etc and that indeed, whore moan all changes are at work

should WE as a society let ourselves be subject to such WHIM?

 

[Busybody]

reality is

that study after study, election after election, decade after decade


show

that women base their vote on look, dress etc and that indeed, whore moan all changes are at work

should WE as a society let ourselves be subject to such WHIM?

we ALL know that to be true


say so, and the PC POLICE are upside the ass

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/25/cnn-scratches-womens-hormones-voting-choices_n_2015652.html

 

[Busybody]

we ALL know that to be true


say so, and the PC POLICE are upside the ass

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/25/cnn-scratches-womens-hormones-voting-choices_n_2015652.html

CNN Scratches Story On How Women's Hormones Influence Voting Choices


The Huffington Post | By Rebecca Shapiro Posted: 10/25/2012 8:33 am EDT Updated: 10/26/2012 3:52 am EDT


CNN has removed a story from its website about how women's hormones can affect their voting choices.

The story, which appeared on the website's health section, reported on a study that investigated how women vote differently based on a variety of factors: if they were ovulating, single, in a committed relationship, and more. The study reportedly found that women who are ovulating tend to vote liberal because they "feel sexier."

The article also stated that "the most controversial part of the study is not only that hormonal cycles are linked to women's preferences for candidates and voting behaviors, but also that single women who are ovulating are more likely to be socially liberal."

The piece was quickly mocked on Twitter and by other media outlets, including The Huffington Post.

CNN later scratched the story. The link that once led to the article now brought readers to an editors note:

Post removed: Study looks at voting and hormones A post previously published in this space regarding a study about how hormones may influence voting choices has been removed.
After further review it was determined that some elements of the story did not meet the editorial standards of CNN.

We thank you for your comments and feedback.


According to the Washington Post's Erik Wemple, CNN said that the story did not go through the proper editorial channels before landing on the news network's website. CNN released the following statement:

However, it’s worth noting that the post in question did not channel through the standard internal process and it was not reviewed by senior editorial staff before appearing on CNN.com. As recognized by our leadership, audience and critics, the piece did not meet the journalistic standards of CNN and should not have appeared on our site. We had an obligation to remove it.

 

[kbate]

reality is

that study after study, election after election, decade after decade show

that women base their vote on look, dress etc and that indeed, whore moan all changes are at work should WE as a society let ourselves be subject to such WHIM?

Study after shite study is shite.

Let's talk about the number of men who talked about Sarah Palin's tits and Michelle Bachmann's looks. . .

Let's talk about how many old Nancy Pelosi photos (from youth) and how many 'Chelsea is Ugly" threads we've had.

My own studies prove that men only care about appearance and there's no way in hell that we should have a nation where those men are allowed to vote.

 

[Busybody]

Study after shite study is shite............well OF COURSE studies that don't gp your way are suspect

Let's talk about the number of men who talked about Sarah Palin's tits and Michelle Bachmann's looks. . . ..........and they DID look great, but more importantly, WERE PEOPLE OF SUBSTANCE!

Let's talk about how many old Nancy Pelosi photos (from youth)..........she is NOT ony UGLY, but vile and evil as well and how many 'Chelsea is Ugly" ............she is.....and has cashed in on her name to the detriment of others.....threads we've had.

My own studies prove that men only care about appearance and there's no way in hell that we should have a nation where those men are allowed to vote.

 

[chillywilly2]

Study after shite study is shite.

Let's talk about the number of men who talked about Sarah Palin's tits and Michelle Bachmann's looks. . .

Let's talk about how many old Nancy Pelosi photos (from youth) and how many 'Chelsea is Ugly" threads we've had.

My own studies prove that men only care about appearance and there's no way in hell that we should have a nation where those men are allowed to vote.

We may talk about it, but we don't let it influence our vote...my wife wants to vote for justin because he's cute...ffs is right

 

[phrodeau]

I agree that Michele Bachmann is a person of substance.

However, we probably disagree on what that substance is.

 

[Busybody]

women

shouldn't

be

allowed

to

VOTE



or at least, have to answer 22 questions on the person they will vote for, to make sure they know what the fuck they are doing

 

[Tryharder62]

Further evidence against evolution. Not far from the cavemen around here.

 

[SalviaDivinorum]

When we ovulate we're perceptive as fuck.

 

[Busybody]

yeah