Me

Insta Kill? I don't know. I've been playing COD and GTA for a while ... I always go for a head shot though! :p

And for posting on your thread .... mmm .. i praise what I feel deserves it!
(unless am drunk .. LMAO):p

Do people actually go for anything but a head shot? :D When I play MW2 or GTA, or hell any other game that involves me shooting, I always go for the head shots :)

I soooo have to get God of War 3
 
Do people actually go for anything but a head shot? :D When I play MW2 or GTA, or hell any other game that involves me shooting, I always go for the head shots :)

I soooo have to get God of War 3

Head Shots are what i always go after .... obviously when I play to win (which most of us do usually ) but there is also something called "fun play" .. for such purposes I have other preferences .. such as Vulcan Mini Gun in GTA !

God I love that weapon!:devil::devil: Total annihilation!:devil::devil:
(One of the main reasons I love GTA!)
 
Last edited:
Looking quite gorgeous, Kim. :D

Now that -that- is outta the way, onto more gaming talk. *smirks and winks* In all seriousness, it is really frigging awesome that you like those sorta games. Love COD and GTA and lately I've been trying to get used to playing MW on the Wii. Sure they may not own with the graphics, but with a shooting game, you think the motion technology would wipe the floor on the gameplay exp to either PS3 or the 360.
 
Looking quite gorgeous, Kim. :D

Now that -that- is outta the way, onto more gaming talk. *smirks and winks* In all seriousness, it is really frigging awesome that you like those sorta games. Love COD and GTA and lately I've been trying to get used to playing MW on the Wii. Sure they may not own with the graphics, but with a shooting game, you think the motion technology would wipe the floor on the gameplay exp to either PS3 or the 360.

Good graphics are always a plus point but do Graphics count that much? Come'on .. action crazy souls need some good maps, a lot of ambushes, some breath taking weapons(the bigger the better) .. and one nice control so that you can Kill 'em all ... that too smiling!

Even though Quake 3 is way too old, I still consider it to be the almost best FPS game I ever played. It had speed, and loads of blood!
 
Last edited:
Good graphics are always a plus point but do Graphics count that much? Come'on .. action crazy souls need some good maps, a lot of ambushes, some breath taking weapons(the bigger the better) .. and one nice control so that you can Kill 'em all ... that too smiling!

Even though Quake 3 is way too old, I still consider it to be the almost best FPS game I ever played. It had speed, and loads of blood!

Ok....first off....what a sexy arse it is....even if it is lazy. ;)

As for the graphics/gameplay ratio....it actually does matter.....thankfully some of the best games ever (Metal Gear Solid, God of War, Halo, Super Mario....etc) had graphics that were advanced for their time and at least a decent (if not fucking awesome) storyline. Am I glad that games nowadays are more realistic in appearance? To a degree, yes. But you can't deny that games of the past....with images as simple as a yellow circle with a pie piece cut out, a triangle flying through space or two lines playing tennis, helped make games as addictive as they are.
 
Ok....first off....what a sexy arse it is....even if it is lazy. ;)

As for the graphics/gameplay ratio....it actually does matter.....thankfully some of the best games ever (Metal Gear Solid, God of War, Halo, Super Mario....etc) had graphics that were advanced for their time and at least a decent (if not fucking awesome) storyline. Am I glad that games nowadays are more realistic in appearance? To a degree, yes. But you can't deny that games of the past....with images as simple as a yellow circle with a pie piece cut out, a triangle flying through space or two lines playing tennis, helped make games as addictive as they are.

Mario was legend, so no comments.
As I said, graphics are always a plus point, but some companies are just trying to make games as realistic as possible but I wonder if games are supposed to be realistic or fantasy? I had quit playing GTA: SA half way because I got sick of the game at some point even though it had better graphics and more realistic. I still go back and play vice city sometimes. (yeah .. that OG was such a sucker!)

Realistic images are ++ but not the story line. A game must always be garnished with some maniac-ism!


PS: If you know, The nose of mario was made so big only to eliminate other facial features. It didn't mattered then till you were able to stomp on those hideous creatures and score 1ups! I hope you get my point!
 
Last edited:
Mario was legend, so no comments.
As I said, graphics are always a plus point, but some companies are just trying to make games as realistic as possible but I wonder if games are supposed to be realistic or fantasy? I had quit playing GTA: SA half way because I got sick of the game at some point even though it had better graphics and more realistic. I still go back and play vice city sometimes. (yeah .. that OG was such a sucker!)

Realistic images are ++ but not the story line. A game must always be garnished with some maniac-ism!


PS: If you know, The nose of mario was made so big only to eliminate other facial features. It didn't mattered then till you were able to stomp on those hideous creatures and score 1ups! I hope you get my point!

*coughs* Was? WAS?!?!?!? :p Good question.....since games are supposed to be an escape from reality, is it good to have games such as Modern Warfare, GTA, Mercenaries....that although the storyline themselves are fictional, they are very close to events going on in the world today. When is it too much for a game to be 'too real'?

That depends on the individual I suppose. Vice City was a great game....how could you not love the brilliance of a name like Lance Vance?

The one level in MW 2, "No Russian" is perhaps one of the most controversial games/levels I agree with, because that's some realistic and messed up stuff going on there. But in the end.....no matter how much it may be mirroring reality, it's a game.

And yes I did know that...also why he had a huge 70's pornstar 'stache.
 
*coughs* Was? WAS?!?!?!? :p Good question.....since games are supposed to be an escape from reality, is it good to have games such as Modern Warfare, GTA, Mercenaries....that although the storyline themselves are fictional, they are very close to events going on in the world today. When is it too much for a game to be 'too real'?

That depends on the individual I suppose. Vice City was a great game....how could you not love the brilliance of a name like Lance Vance?

The one level in MW 2, "No Russian" is perhaps one of the most controversial games/levels I agree with, because that's some realistic and messed up stuff going on there. But in the end.....no matter how much it may be mirroring reality, it's a game.

And yes I did know that...also why he had a huge 70's pornstar 'stache.


Great, I suppose one of the mods is gonna come and tell us to quit Lit and join another gaming forum if we were to continue with our discussion "what would be the perfect game?" ....


:p

PS: I l'd the "no russian" somehow .... massacre!
 
Great, I suppose one of the mods is gonna come and tell us to quit Lit and join another gaming forum if we were to continue with our discussion "what would be the perfect game?" ....


:p

PS: I l'd the "no russian" somehow .... massacre!

Yes, I AM BAD!
 
that black bikini at the beach series is especially hot :D
 
Back
Top