Mar a Lago Employee # 4 Bombshell.

Lazaran

Literotica Guru
Joined
May 14, 2020
Posts
16,060

Rut-Roh….

https://www.mediaite.com/politics/t...-identified-as-mar-a-lago-it-director-report/

From the article:

“Prosecutors say Trump, along with two employees Walt Naruta and Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos De Oliveira, tried to ‘alter, mutilate and conceal evidence’ after trying to delete security camera footage. Why? De Oliveira has been added to the case as a defendant now. Prosecutors argue he told the IT Director that, quote, ‘The Boss’ wanted that server deleted.”

That ^ can’t be good for the rapey, racist, misogynistic, corrupt orange traitor’s defense.

👍

🤣

🇺🇸
 
Trump now wants to look over the classified documents in the comfort of his Mar-a-Lago living room, so that he can prepare his defense.

The Special Counsel responded, "There is no basis for the defendant's request that he be given the extraordinary authority to discuss classified information at his residence, and it is particularly striking that he seeks permission to do so in the very location at which he is charged with willfully retaining the documents charged in this case."
 
Trump now wants to look over the classified documents in the comfort of his Mar-a-Lago living room, so that he can prepare his defense.

The Special Counsel responded, "There is no basis for the defendant's request that he be given the extraordinary authority to discuss classified information at his residence, and it is particularly striking that he seeks permission to do so in the very location at which he is charged with willfully retaining the documents charged in this case."

That sociopath is either trying to promote the notion that having the documents at Mar a lago was “no big deal”, or he really doesn’t see it as a big deal.

🤔.

Either way…

Lock him up!!!

👍

🇺🇸
 
Don’t lock him up…..he is an irredeemable traitor….. a .50 cal between the eyes is a more appropriate sentence

Sorry, I’m not really okay with the Death penalty unless it’s a heinous murder case. And even then, I have concerns that some anonymous person has to kill another human because “it’s their job”.

I know it could be argued that the orange POS is responsible for the deaths at the Capitol on J6, but there were others involved that would logically be worthy of the same sentence.

In this case, and with this defendant, “lock him up!!!” seems like poetic justice.

*nods*
 
View attachment 2255417First time he actually looked good in orange……
And his hands are way too big, his arms too long, and what's up with that third set of fingers behind the front crisscrossed pair? Is this one of those alien reveals? No, on a second viewing it's just a typical AI-created thing .... Yet one can still wish for justice. Perhaps confined to live out his sentence in Mira Lago without outside access and remaining there floating between the ballroom, bathroom, and bedroom while looking for more papers under the mattresses or down the pipes?
 
And his hands are way too big, his arms too long, and what's up with that third set of fingers behind the front crisscrossed pair? Is this one of those alien reveals? No, on a second viewing it's just a typical AI-created thing .... Yet one can still wish for justice. Perhaps confined to live out his sentence in Mira Lago without outside access and remaining there floating between the ballroom, bathroom, and bedroom while looking for more papers under the mattresses or down the pipes?
those hands are truly fucked, right? :eek:
 
Smith's team corrects error, having not submitted all materials it believed it had, with superseding indictment.
On Monday, in a letter signed by Smith and others, the team handling the investigation reported that it had provided additional materials, including surveillance footage to Trump's legal team, as part of the case's discovery process.
The letter explained that the materials were not previously provided by mistake, realizing the error as it prepared to submit the superseding indictment. The materials were originally obtained by the government in May, with the DOJ attesting in court on July 18 that all necessary files had been turned over, which it said in hindsight was "therefore incorrect."
"Included in Production 3 is additional CCTV footage from The Mar-a-Lago Club that the Government obtained from the Trump Organization on May 9 and May 12, 2023, in response to a grand jury subpoena served on April 27," the letter explained. "On July 27, as part of the preparation for the superseding indictment coming later that day and the discovery production for Defendant De Oliveira, the Government learned that this footage had not been processed and uploaded to the platform established for the defense to view the subpoenaed footage.
"The Government's representation at the July 18 hearing that all surveillance footage the Government had obtained pre-indictment had been produced was therefore incorrect."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...31&cvid=b6ad7a943bf94b91a2bc47d40271b7dd&ei=8
 
Don’t lock him up…..he is an irredeemable traitor….. a .50 cal between the eyes is a more appropriate sentence
Posts like that have gotten a number of people permanently banned from Lit.

I'd suggest you edit your post ... pronto.
 
trump's former and current lawyer not selling her own skin to cover trump's lies, tells grand jury she told him and he understood it would be a crime if he didn't comply with the subpoena for documents
A Donald Trump attorney provided damning evidence against the former president in the Mar-a-Lago documents case — and a legal analyst said it will almost certainly lead to a conviction once the case finally goes to trial.

ABC News reported that Trump attorney Jennifer Little told a grand jury that she "very clearly" warned the ex-president that he must comply with a federal subpoena for the classified documents he took home from the White House, and she's "absolutely" certain that he understood that failure to do so would be a "crime" — testimony that stunned CNN legal analyst Elie Honig Thursday.
"If you're a prosecutor and you have to prove obstruction, you have to show that the defendant, in this case Donald Trump, knew he had a subpoena, knew he had to comply and intentionally did not do so, and this witness, Trump's former and, by the way, current lawyer, has told the grand jury straight up, no ambiguity, 'You have to comply, if you don't, it's a crime,' and he said, 'I got it, I understand.'"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...1&cvid=02a88bd127a64c8ab90f329c00c707b3&ei=47
 
I’m thinking that lawyers willing to represent that orange POS are in incredibly short supply.

That ^ may explain why she still has a job.

*nods*
Harpy might be available. He can cite God and turn things around pronto for the indicted former President.
 
Harpy might be available. He can cite God and turn things around pronto for the indicted former President.
trump’s got a few more levels to go before he gets down to Harpy’s level of competence.
 
Jack Smith due to meet judge cannon behind closed doors... if she partially/fully rules in trump's favour then an appeal will happen in short order. Perhaps he can take the opportunity to privately correct judicial errors of judgement on her part so she doesn't look stupid or (more) corrupt in the eyes of the public

The 'ex parte' hearing on January 31 pertains to objections filed by Trump lawyers in which they have asked for access to documents that are off-limits because of sensitive information.

In a motion filed in December last year, Trump's lawyers said they "seek attorneys'-eyes-only access to these filings so that we can challenge [Smith's] assertions in adversarial proceedings."

An ex parte meeting is conducted without parties affected by the proceeding and without a transcript, meaning details of Cannon and special counsel's conversations will not be made public.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=7898744282184984b8a1e0f6f58e7fc5&ei=14
 
Jack Smith due to meet judge cannon behind closed doors... if she partially/fully rules in trump's favour then an appeal will happen in short order. Perhaps he can take the opportunity to privately correct judicial errors of judgement on her part so she doesn't look stupid or (more) corrupt in the eyes of the public




https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=7898744282184984b8a1e0f6f58e7fc5&ei=14

Aileen Cannon is such an obviously compromised toady.

Another biased ruling in favor of the corrupt orange traitor wouldn’t surprise me one bit.

I bet Jack Smith already has his appeal paperwork filled out and ready to file.

*nods*
 
Last edited:
can't find the right thread for this but since he's a jan 6th trump co-defendant i'm dropping it here for now)

The D.C. Bar Office of Disciplinary Counsel filed ethics charges against Clark in July 2022. Those proceedings have been paused for several months as the result of various appeals. Clark motioned to have the case against him removed to a federal court in October 2022. A federal judge denied that request in June 2023 in an opinion finding federal courts have no jurisdiction over attorney licensing disputes.

In November 2023, the board overseeing the professional misconduct case rescheduled the proceedings to begin in January. Clark was able to pause that order once again, by filing a motion to stay with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in December 2023. A three-judge panel, however, made up of two Trump-appointed judges (Neomi Rao and Gregory Katsas) and one Joe Biden-appointed judge (Brad Garcia) declined to further delay the long-running ethics case.
“Appellant has not shown that intervening developments warrant reconsideration of the denial of a stay pending appeal,” the panel ruled in their terse, one-page order denying the stay.
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profil...arings-over-2020-election-subversion-efforts/
 
Back
Top