Many have asked over time..how could good Germans kill so many innocents

[Saint_Ann]

got any actual evidence the vote was made to let hillary win?
got any actual evidence the vote was made to let biden win?

you mean...bs fox mightve said?
so when the actual govt says there was russian meddling or there was no evidence found of tampering...etc...are those less credible or more...than say...a right-wing entertainment show?

I can't follow that. I understand you are angry ( and perhaps crazy) but is there anything I can do to help?

 

[Bray123]

Anything else Musk says you don't believe except that? Lol. Trump won because Harris was unelectable. So you support paper ballots and voter ID the same as Trump?

No, it's all bollocks. But it was said to entertain the poorly educated gullible and are we not entitled to take it at face value for purposes that suits us, or is it only for purposes that suit you.

A bit like the measurements of a New York apartment, one size to suit the bank and the other to suit the tax department.

 

[LilKitKat]

I can't follow that. I understand you are angry ( and perhaps crazy) but is there anything I can do to help?

Next time Ill just use words you might understand like

racism. guns. pro-life. coal. fake news. the best. tranny. blue lives matter. woke. losers. enemies of the people.

 

[Saint_Ann]

No, it's all bollocks. But it was said to entertain the poorly educated gullible and are we not entitled to take it at face value for purposes that suits us, or is it only for purposes that suit you.

A bit like the measurements of a New York apartment, one size to suit the bank and the other to suit the tax department.

Nothin' gets thru that tinfoil hat of yours.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Next time Ill just use words you might understand like

racism. guns. pro-life. coal. fake news. the best. tranny. blue lives matter. woke. losers. enemies of the people.

It's the context that's missing.

 

[LilKitKat]

It's the context that's missing.

its ok. i understand you dont understand when someone answers a question with a question response to clarify things and/or make a point.
even though english is my third language, ill try to dumb it down even more for you moving forward

 

[Saint_Ann]

its ok. i understand you dont understand when someone answers a question with a question response to clarify things and/or make a point.
even though english is my third language, ill try to dumb it down even more for you moving forward

That explains much. What you're saying isn't what you think you're saying.

 

[LilKitKat]

That explains much. What you're saying isn't what you think you're saying.

mmmmkay, keep telling yerself that one

 

[Saint_Ann]

mmmmkay, keep telling yerself that one

That explains much. What you're saying isn't what you think you're saying.

 

[LilKitKat]

That explains much. What you're saying isn't what you think you're saying.

mmmmkay, keep telling yerself that one

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
So you're going with "guilty until proven innocent"? Thanks for letting us know!

I'll take that as yes, yes. Snort another line of fentanyl.

Soon as you provide evidence that the Venezuelan boat had fentanyl on it . . .

Oh, right, you have no evidence!

Do you think Charlie Kirk was shot for trafficking fentanyl? No evidence for it, of course, but according to your "guilty until proven innocent" can't we just execute the bad guys without having to prove anything?

 

[HisArpy]

Soon as you provide evidence that the Venezuelan boat had fentanyl on it . . .

Oh, right, you have no evidence!

Do you think Charlie Kirk was shot for trafficking fentanyl? No evidence for it, of course, but according to your "guilty until proven innocent" can't we just execute the bad guys without having to prove anything?

Flailing.

And failing at it.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Soon as you provide evidence that the Venezuelan boat had fentanyl on it . . .

Oh, right, you have no evidence!

Do you think Charlie Kirk was shot for trafficking fentanyl? No evidence for it, of course, but according to your "guilty until proven innocent" can't we just execute the bad guys without having to prove anything?

Why do you hate America?

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Soon as you provide evidence that the Venezuelan boat had fentanyl on it . . .

Oh, right, you have no evidence!

Do you think Charlie Kirk was shot for trafficking fentanyl? No evidence for it, of course, but according to your "guilty until proven innocent" can't we just execute the bad guys without having to prove anything?

Why do you hate America?

I don't even hate Donald Trump! I do think blowing people up without evidence that they did anything bad is wrong.

In fact, I'd guess you think such a thing is Un-American, don't you?

 

[Saint_Ann]

I don't even hate Donald Trump! I do think blowing people up without evidence that they did anything bad is wrong.

In fact, I'd guess you think such a thing is Un-American, don't you?

The lack of sharing the evidence is not a lack of evidence. It is your choice to believe the military acted inappropriately. Why is that?

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
I don't even hate Donald Trump! I do think blowing people up without evidence that they did anything bad is wrong.

In fact, I'd guess you think such a thing is Un-American, don't you?

The lack of sharing the evidence is not a lack of evidence. It is your choice to believe the military acted inappropriately. Why is that?

If a prosecutor in a trial says, "The defendant is guilty, take my word for it," but provides no evidence, should the jury convict?

If the President says those people he blew up were bad people, but gives no evidence, why should we believe him? Or do you have boundless trust in your government?

 

[Saint_Ann]

If a prosecutor in a trial says, "The defendant is guilty, take my word for it," but provides no evidence, should the jury convict?

If the President says those people he blew up were bad people, but gives no evidence, why should we believe him? Or do you have boundless trust in your government?

What has any other administration attempted to do about the fentanyl problem? Maybe, just maybe it's time to start being proactive against the cartels, the crime rate, political corruption and dot, dot, dot. Your hatred of Trump, though you refuse to acknowledge it, makes you want to believe the boat was full of innocent fisherman going out at night to catch mackerel instead of 100 kilos. Venezuela is a whole nuther can of fish.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Is it the official MAGA position to blow up boats in the Caribbean without presenting a reason for doing so?

Still waiting for the evidence the 11 Venezuelans were trafficking fentanyl, or anything else for that matter.

You don’t know the evidence. Our military is not going to divulge intelligence or sources and methods.

Perhaps. On the other hand, if you can't prove someone is guilty, then punishing them is . . . Un-American, isn't it?

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
If a prosecutor in a trial says, "The defendant is guilty, take my word for it," but provides no evidence, should the jury convict?

If the President says those people he blew up were bad people, but gives no evidence, why should we believe him? Or do you have boundless trust in your government?

What has any other administration attempted to do about the fentanyl problem? Maybe, just maybe it's time to start being proactive against the cartels, the crime rate, political corruption and dot, dot, dot. Your hatred of Trump, though you refuse to acknowledge it, makes you want to believe the boat was full of innocent fisherman going out at night to catch mackerel instead of 100 kilos. Venezuela is a whole nuther can of fish.

Of course you know fentanyl, if it's not manufactured at home in the USA, mostly comes to your country through overland routes from Mexico, rather than by speedboats making long journeys from Venezuela.

Perhaps they were carrying drugs. But most likely not, and not fentanyl if it was drugs.

But of course we all know President Trump has no evidence at all the boat was transporting drugs. Otherwise he would have splashed it all over social media.

Do you really think "guilty until proven innocent" is a way to handle law enforcement? How Un-American.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Of course you know fentanyl, if it's not manufactured at home in the USA, mostly comes to your country through overland routes from Mexico, rather than by speedboats making long journeys from Venezuela.

Perhaps they were carrying drugs. But most likely not, and not fentanyl if it was drugs.

But of course we all know President Trump has no evidence at all the boat was transporting drugs. Otherwise he would have splashed it all over social media.

Do you really think "guilty until proven innocent" is a way to handle law enforcement? How Un-American.

You're the one proclaiming guilty until innocent.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Of course you know fentanyl, if it's not manufactured at home in the USA, mostly comes to your country through overland routes from Mexico, rather than by speedboats making long journeys from Venezuela.

Perhaps they were carrying drugs. But most likely not, and not fentanyl if it was drugs.

But of course we all know President Trump has no evidence at all the boat was transporting drugs. Otherwise he would have splashed it all over social media.

Do you really think "guilty until proven innocent" is a way to handle law enforcement? How Un-American.

You're the one proclaiming guilty until innocent.

On the contrary, I'm willing to look at any evidence your President might have that the 11 people he blew up might be criminals.

If he has this evidence, then he might explain how it justifies extrajudicial killing, which was always considered Un-American.

 

[Saint_Ann]

On the contrary, I'm willing to look at any evidence your President might have that the 11 people he blew up might be criminals.

If he has this evidence, then he might explain how it justifies extrajudicial killing, which was always considered Un-American.

So until you see the evidence, the military is guilty.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
On the contrary, I'm willing to look at any evidence your President might have that the 11 people he blew up might be criminals.

If he has this evidence, then he might explain how it justifies extrajudicial killing, which was always considered Un-American.

So until you see the evidence, the military is guilty.

Did I say that (checks back over previous posts) No, it seems I didn't!

But make sure you let me know when President Trump presents his evidence, mmmkay?

 

[Saint_Ann]

Did I say that (checks back over previous posts) No, it seems I didn't!

But make sure you let me know when President Trump presents his evidence, mmmkay?

Is the military guilty for blowing up that boat or not? Simple question.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Did I say that (checks back over previous posts) No, it seems I didn't!

But make sure you let me know when President Trump presents his evidence, mmmkay?

Is the military guilty for blowing up that boat or not? Simple question.

According to your President, the military certainly did blow up that boat.

Let's assume there were drugs on the boat, though no evidence has been shown of this and your President would most likely have posted it on social media by now if he had any.

In that case, do you believe blowing up that boat would constitute an extrajudicial killing? Or was it a sentence imposed after a fair trial?