MAGA, time for a new leader of MAGA

[KingDJT]

I'm sorry, King. I think you have things reversed. It is the MAGA movement that is criminal and communist. I don't know what news you follow and I don't really care as you seem to be guzzling the high-octane Kool-aide that is distributed by the MAGA conspiracy theorists. I'm just a flash in the pan here as I don't follow your rants from morning until night nor do I plan to in the future. Here's the reality TV: you are following a leader that has a felony which, I'm sure you know and understand, would eliminate almost anyone and everyone in this country from a call back in an interview for a job, including the most possibly attractive of those. Your rabbit hole is deep and wide. The table is set for a tyrant to rule and you are his fool. Thanks for your input, comrade but you are not really welcome here so please go away. My last recognition of your foolish bs posts. Be well.

I don't care what you think! The real story on 911 will be out spon as will ....well the reason we voted for Trump is because he's taking the communist party of perverts out completely and with the arrests coming, there won't be anyone left in your party to run for anything! TRUTH

 

[Politruk]

The real story on 911 will be out spon as will

Up to now, 9/11 Truthers were leftists who blamed W for setting up a false-flag attack as a pretext for war.

What is the RW version?

 

[PaxNurgle]

There has long been this RW populist-nationalist current in American politics. In the 1990s, it took the form of Ross Perot and the Reform Party. In the Obama years it was reborn as the Tea Party. And then Trump simply placed himself at the head of it. There is no reason why after he passes from the scene, the movement will not survive, just waiting for a new leader.

The thing is, Perot's policies were actually sensible, as were those of Ron Paul during the 2012 election cycle. I would actually have VOTED for Ron Paul had he been the nominee (and I did support him in the primary, though I was leery of Romney and hence ended up voting for Obama.) Neither of them embraced the white-nationalist, totalitarian, anti-Constitution/pro-dictatorship policies that Trump and his minions did. I didn't agree with everything that either of them stood for, but they were rational and above all, sane. I could see these guys attracting the more rational/reasonable Trump voters, and pursuing both domestic (economic and social) and foreign policies that are far more acceptable both to the mainstream and the mainstream-right voting bloc than Trump.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Ohhhh you communist leftists are in for a treat!!! A HUGE one at that! That's a BIG PROMISE! And the best part, you will never have the chance again! TRUTH

I have known and liked members of the American Communist Party. We disagreed on most issues. Unlike some posters here, they disagreed with me and remained agreeable. There are too few Communists for you to worry about, KingDJT. Go back to worrying about the bogy man.

 

[Chernosoth]

He will probably die or retire of old age and diet before his term ends, maybe after one last product endorsement, such as for Orange Crush.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

If only the Democrats had put forward a viable candidate.

 

[Wylie3]

MAGA will be even bigger after Trump goes as he will have trashed the place so badly it will need a complete rebuild.

 

[Politruk]

If only the Democrats had put forward a viable candidate.

They had a candidate who would have made a much, much better president than Trump -- what more could they do?

 

[Politruk]

MAGA will be even bigger after Trump goes as he will have trashed the place so badly it will need a complete rebuild.

But MAGA will still not be fit to build or rebuild anything.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

They had a candidate who would have made a much, much better president -- what more could they do?

LoL. She couldn’t even win a primary in 2020.

 

[Bray123]

LoL. She couldn’t even win a primary in 2020.

All those white folkkks calling themselves 'Christians' will never vote for a black woman.

 

[HisArpy]

All those white folkkks calling themselves 'Christians' will never vote for a black woman.

dudly, only 3 percent of Californians voted for her and she's from California.

California is currently made up of:

40% Hispanic/Latino
16% Asian
6% African American
1% Native American
34% White

So you've got me wondering how only 34% of the "white folkkks" somehow managed to become 97% of the voters and leaving only 3% of "Brown People" to vote for Harris.



Basically, your post is yet another shining example of the stupidity the Left displays here on Lit. It has zero substance and lots of dum already half-baked in before you manage to ask Chat GPT to type and post it for you.

 

[Politruk]

LoL. She couldn’t even win a primary in 2020.

There is no reason to think she could not have, and there was nothing irregular about Harris' nomination. If at the same point in the process Biden, having won the primaries, had simply died, no one would have suggested another round of primaries was necessary -- it would only have meant the delegates bound to vote for Biden at the convention were no longer so bound and would have to agree on somebody else -- which is exactly what happened.

 

[HisArpy]

There is no reason to think she could not have, and there was nothing irregular about Harris' nomination. If at the same point in the process Biden, having won the primaries, had simply died, no one would have suggested another round of primaries was necessary -- it would only have meant the delegates bound to vote for Biden at the convention were no longer so bound and would have to agree on somebody else -- which is exactly what happened.

Except she couldn't win her primary in 2020 because she could only rally 3% of the vote.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Except she couldn't win her primary in 2020 because she could only rally 3% of the vote.

So what? Trump couldn't win the 2020 election, but here he is President.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

There is no reason to think she could not have, and there was nothing irregular about Harris' nomination. If at the same point in the process Biden, having won the primaries, had simply died, no one would have suggested another round of primaries was necessary -- it would only have meant the delegates bound to vote for Biden at the convention were no longer so bound and would have to agree on somebody else -- which is exactly what happened.

She ran in 2020 and had to drop out without winning a single primary. Terrible candidate.

 

[Bray123]

dudly, only 3 percent of Californians voted for her and she's from California.

California is currently made up of:

40% Hispanic/Latino
16% Asian
6% African American
1% Native American
34% White

So you've got me wondering how only 34% of the "white folkkks" somehow managed to become 97% of the voters and leaving only 3% of "Brown People" to vote for Harris.



Basically, your post is yet another shining example of the stupidity the Left displays here on Lit. It has zero substance and lots of dum already half-baked in before you manage to ask Chat GPT to type and post it for you.

You can't work out how a third-party chat app that deletes texts isn't suitable for official government business so not many people will heed your opinion on 'dum'.

 

[Politruk]

Trump is 78 now. No matter what happens politically, he can't last much longer. MAGA will need a new leader. You need to start thinking about who is suitable. Vance? DeSantis?

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Trump is 78 now. No matter what happens politically, he can't last much longer. MAGA will need a new leader. You need to start thinking about who is suitable. Vance? DeSantis?

MAGA will die with Trump, like the NAZI's died with Hitler.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

If only the Democrats had put forward a viable candidate.

I heard Lisa Simpson's planning to run next time....*chuckles*

 

[Politruk]

MAGA will die with Trump, like the NAZI's died with Hitler.

But MAGA did not start with Trump. This RW populist-nationalist strain in American politics has existed for a long time. In the 1990s it manifested with Ross Perot and the Reform Party. In the Obama years it was reborn as the Tea Party. And Trump merely placed himself at the head of it. Why would it not survive him?

 

[Fuzzy1975]

But MAGA did not start with Trump. This RW populist-nationalist strain in American politics has existed for a long time. In the 1990s it manifested with Ross Perot and the Reform Party. In the Obama years it was reborn as the Tea Party. And Trump merely placed himself at the head of it.

The far right has existed in the fringe for a longtime. Trump just managed to bind all the factions together under one banner.

Why would it not survive him?

Who else can keep all the right wing outliers focused on one goal?

 

[Politruk]

Who else can keep all the right wing outliers focused on one goal?

No doubt both Vance and DeSantis are laying plans to step into Trump's shoes -- and they're both a lot smarter than he is.

It is certainly not Trump's personal charisma that accounts for his success -- he has the charisma of a rotting dog carcass and he is just barely capable of human speech. It is only that he was savvy enough -- and it did not take much savvy -- to spot the importance and potential of populist nationalism and climb aboard.