Lowering the LIT standard

[Tryharder62]

They will probably lower it. I think it should be but that's just me.
The death penalty might also help.

 

[Wrong Element]

They will probably lower it. I think it should be but that's just me.
The death penalty might also help.

Death penalty for certain Litsters?

Now you have my attention.

 

[remy_lebeau8]

They will probably lower it. I think it should be but that's just me.
The death penalty might also help.

Is lowering the lit standard even possible?

 

[pointless]

sadly,yes, it is possible.

 

[neci]

only murders, suicides and resurrections round these parts.

 

[pointless]

and lots of mindless zombies.

 

[remy_lebeau8]

sadly,yes, it is possible.

I'm scared...

 

[pointless]

it gets worse every day.

 

[neci]

porn peddlers and succubi

 

[Tryharder62]

I wonder who would be the judge?

 

[pointless]

probably some kissass.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Pretty much pedo and beastiality are the only things off limits, and maybe not beastiality. Can the standard be lowered or am I missing something?

 

[Tryharder62]

I think the judge would have to be someone that has posted their bits at one point or another.

 

[evesdream]

it gets worse every day.

It goes up and down. Last summer was the pits. It's like you guys have forgotten blobfish spamming all the threads and a front page full of relentless warrior queen drama.

 

[pointless]

blobfish wasn't that long ago. i have not forgotten.

and how could i forget the warrior queen stuff? it just isn't possible.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Is lowering the lit standard even possible?

Well, we could make it a kiddie-snuff-porn specialty board . . . then our standards would be . . .

No. No, it is not possible.

 

[evesdream]

I'll take 64 pages of tits & bits and the relative absence of Ishmael that we enjoy today, over that other stuff any day of the week, yes sir.

Speaking of Ishmael, that miserable thread about whether Trayvon Martin "deserved it" is no longer on the front page, and even the Cades seem to have settled down considerably.

 

[pointless]

that's all great, but there have been times when i posted a dud thread that no one posted in and then went away for like six hours and came back to see it still on the front page. that didn't used to happen here.

eta: okay, by times i really mean that one time i noticed it, but, seriously, the joint has slowed way the fuck down.

 

[kbate]

I was in agreement until I realised it didn't say, "LT standard".

but meh. . .

 

[lovetoread]

I'd be the judge.

For the men: No penis pics then no posting anything political.

For the women: prove you are a female, then you are a shoo in to post crappy stuff.

 

[neci]

i had a vision of a dancing political penis pop. it was happy.

 

[richard_daily]

I'd be the judge.

For the men: No penis pics then no posting anything political.

For the women: prove you are a female, then you are a shoo in to post crappy stuff.

Lovetoread, I want to Benghazi you.

I was going to post a cock shot, but I don't have a recent one. Sorry!

 

[evesdream]

that's all great, but there have been times when i posted a dud thread that no one posted in and then went away for like six hours and came back to see it still on the front page. that didn't used to happen here.

eta: okay, by times i really mean that one time i noticed it, but, seriously, the joint has slowed way the fuck down.

Alright. I see what you mean now.

 

[lovetoread]

Lovetoread, I want to Benghazi you.

I was going to post a cock shot, but I don't have a recent one. Sorry!

I didn't see this before, but surely by now you've had time to take another pic?

 

[run_silent]

I am willing to be judge. Although I think several that can reach a consensus.

1. Will ban all posters that no matter what the subject is they hijack into their political beliefs.

2. Ban all posters that can not come up with a logical response to a disagreement and just start name calling.

3. Silly threads are just silly and deserve to be here

More to come.