Los Angeles stands up to ICE

[stxjimmy]

My point is (which you might not grasp so I'll spell it out for you...) You kept insisting that Trump rightfully "Won" the 2020 election even after not one, but MANY thorough, unbiased and deep investigations proved otherwise. You kept insisting this after it was thoroughly debunked multiple times.

The 2024 election on the other hand, was never investigated at all. My claims (Which I admit are dubious) have NEVER been debunked- unlike yours about 2020. So, this is really a taste of your own medicine, is it not, Rebbelfive?

Does his intransigence over 2020 make him a complete fool or just a tiresome bore?

 

[butters]

He did not. Kamala Harris rightfully won the popular vote, AND the electoral vote, by several million. Only problem is, several million of Harris's votes were counted as going to Trump. And, unlike in 2020, when claims of fraud were repeatedly debunked, this fact still has merit- it has neither been investigated nor debunked.

So no. Trump did not win the popular vote in 2024. Harris did. can you prove otherwise? I didn't think so.

there is a call for an investigation into 2024 results but it doesn't appear to address the subject you are quoting . I may be mistaken but from what I read here it doesn't. The request is about the mixing up of counted and uncounted ballots. Is there any reality to the claims from an unnamed source? No idea.

He requested that the DOJ investigate the circumstances surrounding the mixing of the ballots at the warehouse, security measures that were in place to prevent such incidents and whether they were followed and the potential impact on the accuracy of election results in Arizona's Maricopa County and elsewhere.

Representative Abe Hamadeh, in a statement: "This alarming situation raises serious questions about the security and integrity of the election process in Maricopa County and potentially beyond.

"The comingling of blank ballots with live ballots poses a significant risk to the accuracy and fairness of election results. It is crucial that we have confidence in the integrity of our elections, and any potential mishandling of ballots must be investigated to ensure that the will of the voters is accurately reflected."

 

[PaxNurgle]

Does his intransigence over 2020 make him a complete fool or just a tiresome bore?

BOTH.

And that is my point. I actually have no valid reason to believe there was anything irregular about the 2024 election (though I have no valid reason to believe there isn't!) But I'm just sick of the childish, stubborn mentality on display by him insisting, despite overwhelming evidence, that 2020 was stolen. Even after it had been proven a million times that it was not.

We all got sick of it long ago. He's like a grown man screaming that "The Easter Bunny is Real" because he's afraid of not getting any candy for Easter. You cannot have a rational discussion with such a man-child.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

ICE just requested access to Dodger Stadium parking lot. The Dodgers said "no" and LAPD sided with the Dodgers to run ICE off.

 

[Politruk]

ICE just requested access to Dodger Stadium parking lot. The Dodgers said "no" and LAPD sided with the Dodgers to run ICE off.

Artful!

 

[butters]

democrats who joined republicans to vote noem in now expressing regrets

yeah....

like it wasn't obvious what she would be like. Sounds to me they voted for her to help them keep their own jobs in divided states and, now she's in and they can't do anything about it, are buttering the bread on the other side.

"I'm very disappointed. I'm very disappointed in her," Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) told NBC. If I were voting on her today, I definitely wouldn't vote for her," he added.

Sen. Andy Kim (D-N.J.) echoed this sentiment.
"She's weaponizing the Department of Homeland Security. She is taking so many actions right now that are making us less safe and going against a lot of the things that she said that she was going to focus on," Kim said Wednesday. "So I have no confidence in her leadership right now," he said, per the NBC report.

Slotkin defended her vote by noting that Michigan has “major equities with the Department of Homeland Security” and is about to open “a huge new bridge” to Canada.

But she criticized Noem’s approach, telling NBC, “She has, frankly, not been in much control of policy. I see her more as a bystander, often, to policy — especially what's going on right now. And you know, we've been urging our committee to take more accountability on her.”

weak words

others who voted her in were: Senators Fetterman (Pa), Gary Peters (D‑Mich.), Maggie Hassan (D‑N.H.), and Jeanne Shaheen (D‑N.H.)

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=063dc2803ab54cbd9a6c4c3003620674&ei=88

 

[heathrowinneo]

democrats who joined republicans to vote noem in now expressing regrets

yeah....

like it wasn't obvious what she would be like. Sounds to me they voted for her to help them keep their own jobs in divided states and, now she's in and they can't do anything about it, are buttering the bread on the other side.






weak words

others who voted her in were: Senators Fetterman (Pa), Gary Peters (D‑Mich.), Maggie Hassan (D‑N.H.), and Jeanne Shaheen (D‑N.H.)

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=063dc2803ab54cbd9a6c4c3003620674&ei=88

There is a thin line between politics and the world's oldest profession and these yo-yo's exemplify both. They sell themselves to keep their jobs.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

The 9th district court of appeals delivered good news for Californians last night.

 

[ll74]

The 9th district court of appeals delivered good news for Californians last night.

Because dip shit can't provide sources
https://www.latimes.com/california/...eals-rules-on-los-angeles-military-deployment

 

[icanhelp1]

BOTH.

And that is my point. I actually have no valid reason to believe there was anything irregular about the 2024 election (though I have no valid reason to believe there isn't!) But I'm just sick of the childish, stubborn mentality on display by him insisting, despite overwhelming evidence, that 2020 was stolen. Even after it had been proven a million times that it was not.

We all got sick of it long ago. He's like a grown man screaming that "The Easter Bunny is Real" because he's afraid of not getting any candy for Easter. You cannot have a rational discussion with such a man-child.

Are you capable of reading for comprehension? My comment has nothing to do with the verity of any elections; you fool. Let me explain it so you can understand. Trump won the election both electorally and popular. One of the key issues he ran on was the out of control migrant issues. My point is that he won and should be allowed to conduct his policy without riots in the streets. Has nothing to do with any election process. You're living in the past. Try to stay on topic.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Are you capable of reading for comprehension? My comment has nothing to do with the verity of any elections; you fool. Let me explain it so you can understand. Trump won the election both electorally and popular. One of the key issues he ran on was the out of control migrant issues. My point is that he won and should be allowed to conduct his policy without riots in the streets. Has nothing to do with any election process. You're living in the past. Try to stay on topic.

It looks like you don’t know what reading is.

Trump ran on a platform that first he would remove immigrants who were violent criminals, he didn’t run on a platform of raiding Home Depot’s, factories, and retaliate against the Dodgers.

Trump’s failure to keep any of his campaign promises is probably why he has incredibly low approval ratings.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

It looks like you don’t know what reading is.

Trump ran on a platform that first he would remove immigrants who were violent criminals, he didn’t run on a platform of raiding Home Depot’s, factories, and retaliate against the Dodgers.

Trump’s failure to keep any of his campaign promises is probably why he has incredibly low approval ratings.

He ran on a promise to implement the largest deportation in American history. If you thought that meant only deporting violent criminals, you were not paying attention.

 

[domroger]

I am wondering if the reason ICE wear masks is if they are J6 protesters or other convicted criminals,or they are afraid of their neighbours or family identifying them.

 

[heathrowinneo]

I am wondering if the reason ICE wear masks is if they are J6 protesters or other convicted criminals,or they are afraid of their neighbours or family identifying them.

wondering if they are also concerned about covid, ya know how the maga faithful are about health concerns (of others)

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

He ran on a promise to implement the largest deportation in American history. If you thought that meant only deporting violent criminals, you were not paying attention.

Ok, you’re another who doesn’t read well.

He said he would remove the violent immigrants FIRST. He’s not doing that. Why is it OK for violent immigrants to stay but those who aren’t doing anything illegal get sent out?

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Ok, you’re another who doesn’t read well.

He said he would remove the violent immigrants FIRST. He’s not doing that. Why is it OK for violent immigrants to stay but those who aren’t doing anything illegal get sent out?

Wrong. There were no caveats in his campaign pledge to implement the largest deportation program in American history.

If you thought you heard him say that only violent criminals would be deported, or that undocumenteds without violent criminal histories would be spared from deportation until after the violent criminals were deported, you were not listening.

 

[Politruk]

ICE agents have been arresting immigrants showing up for their scheduled hearings in immigration court.

That is not defensible.

 

[Politruk]

Wrong. There were no caveats in his campaign pledge to implement the largest deportation program in American history.

If you thought you heard him say that only violent criminals would be deported, or that undocumenteds without violent criminal histories would be spared from deportation until after the violent criminals were deported, you were not listening.

If you were listening, you heard him inflate the presence of violent criminal immigrants far beyond anything grounded in reason or reality. You certainly never heard him say the truth, which is that immigrants, including illegals, are statistically more law-abiding than citizens.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

If you were listening, you heard him inflate the presence of violent criminal immigrants far beyond anything grounded in reason or reality. You ceertainly never heard him say the truth, which is that immigrants, including illegals, are statistically more law-abiding than citizens.

I heard him promise the largest deportation in American history. Anyone in the US illegally is subject to deportation. If you thought otherwise, you’re misinformed.

 

[icanhelp1]

It looks like you don’t know what reading is.

Trump ran on a platform that first he would remove immigrants who were violent criminals, he didn’t run on a platform of raiding Home Depot’s, factories, and retaliate against the Dodgers.

Trump’s failure to keep any of his campaign promises is probably why he has incredibly low approval ratings.

https://www.dw.com/en/trump-threatens-mass-deportations-at-rally-in-new-york-city/video-70617302

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Wrong. There were no caveats in his campaign pledge to implement the largest deportation program in American history.

If you thought you heard him say that only violent criminals would be deported, or that undocumenteds without violent criminal histories would be spared from deportation until after the violent criminals were deported, you were not listening.

Yeah, you’re still wrong and still having a hard time with the English language. If English is not your first language I can translate for you.

No one ever claimed that Trump said he would only deport violent immigrants, again, Trump said multiple times, he would deport them FIRST. He’s not doing tha.

So again, I’m asking why you are OK with violent immigrants getting a pass from Trump while he goes after people who are not violent?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

https://www.dw.com/en/trump-threatens-mass-deportations-at-rally-in-new-york-city/video-70617302

You’re not addressing what I wrote.

 

[Lance_Castro]

You’re not address what I wrote.

Speak engrish!
Lol

 

[icanhelp1]

He ran on a promise to implement the largest deportation in American history. If you thought that meant only deporting violent criminals, you were not paying attention.

PVT dumbfuck loves to play word games. I even provided a video, I believe taken 5 days before election day, that shows Trump reiteration his mass deportation campaign promise and pvt1 still argues. Deporting violent criminals and those that have deportation orders is the common sense way to start.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

PVT dumbfuck loves to play word games. I even provided a video, I believe taken 5 days before election day, that shows Trump reiteration his mass deportation campaign promise and pvt1 still argues. Deporting violent criminals and those that have deportation orders is the common sense way to start.

So again, why isn’t Trump keeping his campaign promise and as you said why is he not using the common sense way and deporting violent immigrants first? Why are you OK with letting Trump let violent members of a Venezuelan gang stay in the country?

If English is not your first language I can translate it for you.