Litiquette2

How many Lit playmates have you had?

  • 0

    Votes: 61 21.9%
  • 1 - 2

    Votes: 50 17.9%
  • 3 - 5

    Votes: 70 25.1%
  • 6 - 10

    Votes: 39 14.0%
  • > 10

    Votes: 59 21.1%

  • Total voters
    279
Status
Not open for further replies.
You guys bring up a good point. I was having a conversation the other day about the various things we call the male member. It was interesting to me that she thought cock was a horrible word and preferred the term dick. Whereas I much prefer cock over dick. What makes one better/worse than the other?
Cock.... dick...meaty drill bit... whatever...

As long as it works, I'm good.... :D
 
You guys bring up a good point. I was having a conversation the other day about the various things we call the male member. It was interesting to me that she thought cock was a horrible word and preferred the term dick. Whereas I much prefer cock over dick. What makes one better/worse than the other?

I feel like dick is just a juvenile term. Cock just doesn't feel that way to me. I also don't like saying the word tits, because it seems sort of juvenile. If I want to be taken seriously, I'll say breasts or cock. That's just me, though.
 
You guys bring up a good point. I was having a conversation the other day about the various things we call the male member. It was interesting to me that she thought cock was a horrible word and preferred the term dick. Whereas I much prefer cock over dick. What makes one better/worse than the other?

Not sure. I mean, some just sound better than the other in certain circumstances.

I think vagina has some of the most crazy terms. Cunny is the most ridiculous. It's so laughable.
 
I feel like dick is just a juvenile term. Cock just doesn't feel that way to me. I also don't like saying the word tits, because it seems sort of juvenile. If I want to be taken seriously, I'll say breasts or cock. That's just me, though.

I always go with, "I'm gonna ram my baby arm into your cockwallet." I usually try it in a stellar Australian accent.
 
Sorry ladies (and gents), I'm taken. Rainshine is the one who walks around with a slippery cunny all day, when she hears these things.

But if you girls wanna send your guys to Pmann's charm school, then I'll teach them how to woo you with words like the ones above. And guys, if you want these ladies foaming at the gash, then send me a PM. I'll help. Call it... Community outreach. (Not court mandated)
 
"Foaming at the gash" is still one of my favourite phrases, evah.

I'm still waiting for the opportunity to try it out in person.... :D
 
Nicknames, euphemisms, clinical terms isn't it about what things do rather than what things are called? Anything more than a syllable or two gets in the way and sounds silly when said aloud.

So today's topic: would you rather be good with words which affords you many opportunities of which you aren't quite as good as your words OR would you prefer to be very good in deeds but not present so well which means your opportunities are considerably fewer?

My hunch is that this will split along gender lines with a few males stating a preference of quality of quantity.
 
That is a tough choice, Chained.

I prefer quality over quantity. In words as in deeds. Wordiness is funny sometimes but it gets tedious after a while.

I would prefer giving and getting better quality in deeds over presenting myself well with words.
 
Nicknames, euphemisms, clinical terms isn't it about what things do rather than what things are called? Anything more than a syllable or two gets in the way and sounds silly when said aloud.

So today's topic: would you rather be good with words which affords you many opportunities of which you aren't quite as good as your words OR would you prefer to be very good in deeds but not present so well which means your opportunities are considerably fewer?

My hunch is that this will split along gender lines with a few males stating a preference of quality of quantity.

I've needed to read this aloud twice.
I want quality.. but I don't see why I should only be allowed to have a little bit of quality.
You never see a great steak house offering a tiny piece of chocolate cake.
 
Nicknames, euphemisms, clinical terms isn't it about what things do rather than what things are called? Anything more than a syllable or two gets in the way and sounds silly when said aloud.

So today's topic: would you rather be good with words which affords you many opportunities of which you aren't quite as good as your words OR would you prefer to be very good in deeds but not present so well which means your opportunities are considerably fewer?

My hunch is that this will split along gender lines with a few males stating a preference of quality of quantity.

It depends on when and why I'm using the word. In ever day life I like real words. I need words to make me feel comfortable.
I just had this conversation with my son yesterday. He kept saying some kid 'tried to tag him in the nuts'. And I kept saying....it's not 'nuts'. I said you call and ear an ear....a leg a leg...call it what it is. He said it makes him feel weird.
In work or life beyond kids I still like quality.
And between the sheets ...well.....as long as it's not contrived I like words to act as a trigger....i can handle nicknames more so then.
edit: anyone can make something sound good so I guess I should add being 'good in deeds'...whatever they may be....should be backed up with words.
 
Nicknames, euphemisms, clinical terms isn't it about what things do rather than what things are called? Anything more than a syllable or two gets in the way and sounds silly when said aloud.

So today's topic: would you rather be good with words which affords you many opportunities of which you aren't quite as good as your words OR would you prefer to be very good in deeds but not present so well which means your opportunities are considerably fewer?

My hunch is that this will split along gender lines with a few males stating a preference of quality of quantity.

Hmmm. I’m not sure I really understand what you’re asking, but….

If we’re talking general life, I’m good enough with words that I generally manage to manufacture opportunity. Often more than I can reasonably take advantage of. :rolleyes:

But, I have a horror of behaving dishonorably, so If I have to pick one I’d prefer better quality in my deeds.

If we’re talking sex, then I’m less articulate. Don’t get me wrong, I still talk a LOT! :D Just less clearly in expressing wants and needs. Really quite annoying, all things considered.

But, my horror of behaving dishonorably definitely extends to sexual relations, so I guess I’d still go with deeds.
 
Woman, you change AVs faster than...I don't quite know what.

I like it. :D

I do! I get bored. Actually I'm trying to get one going of my black cat with glowing red eyes for Halloween.

That just reminds me, I took my laptop in to some techie cause it's full of malware or viruses or something. Probably from watching too much porn. Anyway, I have every Av and XXX pic I ever saved on there. Eh, if he looks, he looks. My only thought is, now I'm most likely the one that has to go pick it up.
 
I do! I get bored. Actually I'm trying to get one going of my black cat with glowing red eyes for Halloween.

You make me feel so staid and boring. :eek: It took me over a year to get just one up. And I didn't even find it myself; one of the regulars on a different thread found it for me. :rolleyes:

That just reminds me, I took my laptop in to some techie cause it's full of malware or viruses or something. Probably from watching too much porn. Anyway, I have every Av and XXX pic I ever saved on there. Eh, if he looks, he looks. My only thought is, now I'm most likely the one that has to go pick it up.

Tricky... Perhaps send someone else out?
 
You make me feel so staid and boring. :eek: It took me over a year to get just one up. And I didn't even find it myself; one of the regulars on a different thread found it for me. :rolleyes:



Tricky... Perhaps send someone else out?

No, you are not boring or staid at all. It didn't happen overnight, that's for sure. If the laptop is ready before next Thursday, I will have to be to pick it up. Or I could say..."it'll get picked up Thursday" :D
 
Nicknames, euphemisms, clinical terms isn't it about what things do rather than what things are called? Anything more than a syllable or two gets in the way and sounds silly when said aloud.

So today's topic: would you rather be good with words which affords you many opportunities of which you aren't quite as good as your words OR would you prefer to be very good in deeds but not present so well which means your opportunities are considerably fewer?

My hunch is that this will split along gender lines with a few males stating a preference of quality of quantity.

I would rather be good in deeds but not present so well, which is probably already true for me in most cases.

Actions speak louder than words. Quality over quantity. Both of these things, indeed.
 
"Foaming at the gash" is still one of my favourite phrases, evah.

I'm still waiting for the opportunity to try it out in person.... :D

There's also frothing at the minge. But it doesn't have that je ne sais quoi as foaming at the gash.

Say that amongst a group of the fairer sex and you'll be tits deep in clunge.
 
I don't quite understand what the question du jour is. (Second French reference- I'm classy as shit)
 
Even more confusing is I don't know what the peeps are answering either.

Sie la vie
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top