Liberals in lockstep

[Busybody]

The Republican Party just ran a presidential candidate who was selling an economic plan that didn't have any numbers in it. And it fucked the working class with its "broadening the base" rhetoric. That's both stupid and evil in equal quantities, right?

yes

making MORE taxpayers

is EVIL

NO ONE SHOULD PAY TAXES

 

[KingOrfeo]

When I see Bronzeage lighting his cigar, I'm reminded of Lassie walking backwards with a turd hanging out of her ass...how about you?

No, actually, my imagination rarely runs in such . . . Just what kind of drugs did you do in the Corps, anyway?!

 

[mercury14]

yes

making MORE taxpayers

is EVIL

NO ONE SHOULD PAY TAXES

Slashing taxes for people who make immense wealth on unearned income funded by tax hikes for people who work for a living and are barely getting by. That doesn't seem terribly ethical to me, nor should it be okay with the party that vowed never to raise taxes for the rest of their lives. It's like there was an asterisk by the pledge that says it doesn't apply to taxes on ordinary people. Taxes on those people are somehow okay to raise - it's actually desirable to do so.

 

[1sickbastard]

The Republican Party just ran a presidential candidate who was selling an economic plan that didn't have any numbers in it. And it fucked the working class with its "broadening the base" rhetoric. That's both stupid and evil in equal quantities, right?

No, just stupid.

 

[Busybody]

^^^MINDLESS




btw, look for the interview with Obama in 08 when he was asked if INCREASING TAXES = INCREASED REVENUE

 

[Busybody]

No, just stupid.

expected from a LIB LOON

 

[mercury14]

No, just stupid.

And conservative voters should bear the blame. They knew it was an election about the economy and they nominated the guy that refused to use numbers. Stupid, yes. Evil? Is it evil to fund tax cuts for the wealthy by taking money from the working poor? It might be a little evil.

 

[1sickbastard]

And conservative voters should bear the blame. They knew it was an election about the economy and they nominated the guy that refused to use numbers. Stupid, yes. Evil? Is it evil to fund tax cuts for the wealthy by taking money from the working poor? It might be a little evil.

Again, nope, just stupid.

 

[about_average]

AJ has decompensated into a full-on bot. Same pastes, same pictures every day regardless of the topic.

I like repetitive image posting. That way I can block them and never see them after the first post.

 

[doctor_insanus]

And conservative voters should bear the blame. They knew it was an election about the economy and they nominated the guy that refused to use numbers. Stupid, yes. Evil? Is it evil to fund tax cuts for the wealthy by taking money from the working poor? It might be a little evil.

At the very least, it's cruel.