Liberals are actually suddenly talking about "women" again after saying there's no such thing as biological sex

[renard_ruse]

Hypocrisy is not even close to the word for it at this point.

They have literally just got done telling everyone that there are "pregnant people" not "pregnant women" yet when a "pregnant person" wants to kill their offspring suddenly its justified because of "woman rights."

Clown World doesn't cover the level of total absurdity anymore.

 

[renard_ruse]

The mainstream media is not even noticing the contradiction of course.

 

[icanhelp1]

Hypocrisy is not even close to the word for it at this point.

They have literally just got done telling everyone that there are "pregnant people" not "pregnant women" yet when a "pregnant person" wants to kill their offspring suddenly its justified because of "woman rights."

Clown World doesn't cover the level of total absurdity anymore.

Does it mean that Mother's Day is back on!!

 

[PaxNurgle]

Why don't you do something more productive like sign up for the army and go fight some Ukraninans.

Or did you fail your physical and that's why Putin assigned you to this job?

 

[pecksniff]

The mainstream media is not even noticing the contradiction of course.

Because it does not exist. Liberals are not denying the existence of biological sex -- the picture is a lot more complicated than that, and therefore not material for mainstream media.

 

[YDB95]

No one ever denied the existence of biological sex. What you are referring to is recognition that it doesn't always match a person's true identity. That is completely different.

 

[HisArpy]

No one ever denied the existence of biological sex. What you are referring to is recognition that it doesn't always match a person's true identity. That is completely different.

Are you trying to say that biological sex can be used like a ficticious business name for some people? Or as an "AKA"?

Here's a novel idea: Let's define "gender" AND "biological sex" as; determined by being born with either ovaries or testicles.

 

[GeorgeSoros]

Rapey the simpleton checking in.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

Rapey the simpleton checking in.

His ovaries are acting up.

 

[YDB95]

Are you trying to say that biological sex can be used like a ficticious business name for some people? Or as an "AKA"?

No. If I had meant that, I would have said that, and I didn't. Even you can see that.

Here's a novel idea: Let's define "gender" AND "biological sex" as; determined by being born with either ovaries or testicles.

Novel but wrong. Gender and sex are two different things.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Novel but wrong. Gender and sex are two different things.

Much like carbon and water.

 

[HisArpy]

No. If I had meant that, I would have said that, and I didn't. Even you can see that.

Well, if you're that confused, then why don't you just come out and say what you mean.

Novel but wrong. Gender and sex are two different things.

Except, science...

 

[HisArpy]

Much like carbon and water.

And another one just can't handle that he got punked in public. Poor baby...

 

[GeorgeSoros]

Except, science...

…makes meaningful and significant distinctions between gender and sex. Take the L and move on.

 

[HisArpy]

…makes meaningful and significant distinctions between gender and sex. Take the L and move on.

Lol, says you...

Sex refers to “the different biological and physiological characteristics of males and females, such as reproductive organs, chromosomes, hormones, etc.” Gender refers to "the socially constructed characteristics of women and men – such as norms, roles and relationships of and between groups of women and men.

Basically, men and women are biological entities based on reproductive characteristics. Gender roles traditionally allow men do men things and women do women things because those things are linked to their reproductive characteristics.

Today's fucked up society thinks that those who believe they're of the opposite sex, in order to do the things the opposite sex does, are somehow not the biological entity their reproductive characteristics say they are. They believe this in order to allow them to act like the other biological entities as if its nothing more than performance art. They've even made stupid claims that both male and female humans can become pregnant despite the medical and biological science which disproves such statements and thereby indicate that those who profess to be able to be one gender opposite their biological characteristics aren't anything more than fucking crazy.

But you know better. Like all those fucking crazies out there who believe that men can become pregnant and menstruate.

Meanwhile history is replete with stories about how individuals have managed to be their actual gender/biological entity and still figured out how to be the person they want to be without faking it or needing the world to invent lies for them.

Joan of Arc for example. Artemesia of Caria for another. Catherine the Great for a third. All of them, and many many many more, were able to be the person they sought to be without LYING about who they were or what their gender was.

Nor did they need a sycophantic press to pave the way to personal and societal ruin while they did it.

Today's gender fluid loooozers don't have the brains or the fortitude of their ancestors. Which garners them no respect from my corner of the world.

 

[icanhelp1]

No. If I had meant that, I would have said that, and I didn't. Even you can see that.

Novel but wrong. Gender and sex are two different things.

Gender = either of the two sexes

Whether social construct or biological construction *sex* is the operative word.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

Poor RAPEY. I mean, because he's poor.

 

[GeorgeSoros]

Lol, says you...



Basically, men and women are biological entities based on reproductive characteristics. Gender roles traditionally allow men do men things and women do women things because those things are linked to their reproductive characteristics.

The page you quoted supports exactly my statement. That science, including biology and behavioral science, make meaningful and significant distinctions between gender and sex.

 

[YDB95]

Well, if you're that confused, then why don't you just come out and say what you mean.

Confused? You're the one who asked me if I meant something completely different from what I said.

Except, science...

Except, science says I'm right. Gender and sex are two different things.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Are you trying to say that biological sex can be used like a ficticious business name for some people? Or as an "AKA"?

Here's a novel idea: Let's define "gender" AND "biological sex" as; determined by being born with either ovaries or testicles.

Are you saying you're a big dipshit?

Fine, so be it. You are rapey the dipshit.

 

[pecksniff]

Except, science...

Science recognizes a distinction between biological sex and psychological gender.

 

[pecksniff]

Today's gender fluid loooozers don't have the brains or the fortitude of their ancestors.

You have no reason whatsoever to believe that.

 

[HisArpy]

Confused? You're the one who asked me if I meant something completely different from what I said.

Except, science says I'm right. Gender and sex are two different things.

Actually, they're two LINKED things. About which "science" says certain behavioral characteristics are linked to certain sex organs.

The fact is, you don't understand "science" means "more than medical knowledge." In this case "behavioral science" tells us that "gender" is a term used to describe actions by certain members of society which are linked to each of the 2 sexes. Those 2 sexes are determined by "biological and medical science" as being male and female.

So, exactly what "science" are you following which refutes that?

 

[YDB95]

Here's a good place to start, if you really do want to learn anything that conflicts with your own bigotries:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_gender_incongruence

 

[pecksniff]

Actually, they're two LINKED things. About which "science" says certain behavioral characteristics are linked to certain sex organs.

The fact is, you don't understand "science" means "more than medical knowledge." In this case "behavioral science" tells us that "gender" is a term used to describe actions by certain members of society which are linked to each of the 2 sexes. Those 2 sexes are determined by "biological and medical science" as being male and female.

So, exactly what "science" are you following which refutes that?

It does not need refutation. What you have said is completely irrelevant to the question of whether transgenderism is a real thing rather than a form of self-delusion.