ImiGirrst
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2012
- Posts
- 650
Dobbs v JWHO isn't really about abortion rights. Oh, a large majority of people in the US think it is, and everyone is stirred up about it. But it's really a Trojan Horse holding a power grab that is being hidden in plain sight.
Let's remember WHAT RIGHT allowed women to have abortions. It was a RIGHT TO PRIVACY. That means SCOTUS didn't overturn an abortion law. Sure, the concept was the catalyst, and a lighting rod at that. But what Roe v Wade really did was uphold our individual right to non-disclosure. It is about your right to tell busybodies to get their nose the hell out of your business.
Practically, in today's world, we sign away the right all the time. If we want to have an insurance company pay for medical reimbursement, we have to explicitly give them permission to see our medical records. We had a RIGHT TO PRIVACY. Granted, the words were really tiny and very lawyerly and when we're in an ER, we'll sign almost anything to get our issues dealt with fast. So we sign away our right. It's pro forma. BUT it has to be done. WE have to give permission.
Same goes with playing that game on FaceBook. You have to agree to give Zuckerberg or the creator of the game access. Sometimes it's a little and sometimes it's a lot, but no one develops a product and gives it away for free. You agree to give them a valuable commodity otherwise you don't get to play. And companies like Cambridge Analytica were very smart in giving you a little bit, because they knew you weren't going to read the fine print - and you agreed to give them access to a LOT of information that they used for all kinds of things. Completely legal and very smart. But they can't get information on you without your consent - your right to privacy protects you, even on the online platform.
How many people here hide being here? And you can within the terms Laurel and company had you agree to when you got a login.
Same thing why law enforcement has to prove probable cause. They don't get to search your trunk on a traffic stop if they can't prove they have a reason to. They ASK if they can see your trunk. Technically, you're allowed to push back. You can ask why, you can ask why it's germane to a traffic stop, you can say no. They're really good at intimidation and making you think you're in the wrong for not giving them what they ask for. But next time, be aware - will they ask you? or Will they tell you? Three months ago, they would have had to ask. Now? they may not have to...
Because now, SCOTUS has determined that any right not expressly contained in the Constitution does not exist. A law must be expressly written to give you that right.
So this whole lightning rod issue of Abortion Rights is only a cover for allowing whoever is in power in whatever government has jurisdiction where you live to enter your life without your consent.
So if there is no law that expressly says you have a right to keep law enforcement out of your house, out of your computer, out of your medical records – Tough darts. SCOTUS has ruled that your Right to Privacy does not exist.
And that's for everyone.
Chew on that for a while why you wonder why women hate babies. It’s not really about babies at all.
Let's remember WHAT RIGHT allowed women to have abortions. It was a RIGHT TO PRIVACY. That means SCOTUS didn't overturn an abortion law. Sure, the concept was the catalyst, and a lighting rod at that. But what Roe v Wade really did was uphold our individual right to non-disclosure. It is about your right to tell busybodies to get their nose the hell out of your business.
Practically, in today's world, we sign away the right all the time. If we want to have an insurance company pay for medical reimbursement, we have to explicitly give them permission to see our medical records. We had a RIGHT TO PRIVACY. Granted, the words were really tiny and very lawyerly and when we're in an ER, we'll sign almost anything to get our issues dealt with fast. So we sign away our right. It's pro forma. BUT it has to be done. WE have to give permission.
Same goes with playing that game on FaceBook. You have to agree to give Zuckerberg or the creator of the game access. Sometimes it's a little and sometimes it's a lot, but no one develops a product and gives it away for free. You agree to give them a valuable commodity otherwise you don't get to play. And companies like Cambridge Analytica were very smart in giving you a little bit, because they knew you weren't going to read the fine print - and you agreed to give them access to a LOT of information that they used for all kinds of things. Completely legal and very smart. But they can't get information on you without your consent - your right to privacy protects you, even on the online platform.
How many people here hide being here? And you can within the terms Laurel and company had you agree to when you got a login.
Same thing why law enforcement has to prove probable cause. They don't get to search your trunk on a traffic stop if they can't prove they have a reason to. They ASK if they can see your trunk. Technically, you're allowed to push back. You can ask why, you can ask why it's germane to a traffic stop, you can say no. They're really good at intimidation and making you think you're in the wrong for not giving them what they ask for. But next time, be aware - will they ask you? or Will they tell you? Three months ago, they would have had to ask. Now? they may not have to...
Because now, SCOTUS has determined that any right not expressly contained in the Constitution does not exist. A law must be expressly written to give you that right.
So this whole lightning rod issue of Abortion Rights is only a cover for allowing whoever is in power in whatever government has jurisdiction where you live to enter your life without your consent.
So if there is no law that expressly says you have a right to keep law enforcement out of your house, out of your computer, out of your medical records – Tough darts. SCOTUS has ruled that your Right to Privacy does not exist.
And that's for everyone.
Chew on that for a while why you wonder why women hate babies. It’s not really about babies at all.
Last edited:
