Latest Clinton Madness

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
67,792
Hillary blurts from beneath her tent:


Hillary Clinton says Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset' groomed to ensure Trump reelection
by Tim Pearce
October 18, 2019 11:35 AM

Hillary Clinton said that Rep. Tulsi Gabbard is being groomed by Moscow to run as a third-party spoiler candidate in 2020 to help President Trump win reelection.

The former secretary of state pushed the theory on the Campaign HQ podcast hosted by David Plouffe, President Barack Obama’s campaign manager in 2008.

Plouffe and Clinton discussed hurdles the Democratic nominee would face and compared the 2020 race to Clinton’s loss to Trump in 2016. Plouffe asked Clinton about the part third-party candidates, such as Jill Stein of the Green Party, played in 2016, allowing Trump to secure key states.

"They are also going to do third party again," Clinton said. "I'm not making any predictions, but I think they’ve got their eye on somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate," Clinton said, referring to Gabbard, without mentioning the Hawaii representative by name.

"She is a favorite of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far. That's assuming Jill Stein will give it up, which she might not because she is also a Russian asset.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ian-asset-groomed-to-ensure-trump-re-election
 
How many times did Tulsi drop the phrase "regime change wars" (which has obviously never been our policy in Syria) in the debate the other night? I don't know if she was ordered to use that particular bit of Russian phraseology or if it just comes naturally to her at this point, but it's telling nonetheless. And then there's her frequent appearances on Fox News, where she goes after not individual candidates but the party as a whole. That's not something one does if they're serious about the nomination, so what else could her endgame be?

After all this time, her various antics have finally bought her some serious primary competition back in Hawaii, so she might assume there's not much incentive to not go third party.
 
How many times did Tulsi drop the phrase "regime change wars" (which has obviously never been our policy in Syria) in the debate the other night? I don't know if she was ordered to use that particular bit of Russian phraseology or if it just comes naturally to her at this point, but it's telling nonetheless. And then there's her frequent appearances on Fox News, where she goes after not individual candidates but the party as a whole. That's not something one does if they're serious about the nomination, so what else could her endgame be?

After all this time, her various antics have finally bought her some serious primary competition back in Hawaii, so she might assume there's not much incentive to not go third party.

^^^IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Obama finally calls for regime change in Syria

https://therightscoop.com/obama-finally-calls-for-regime-change-in-syria/
 
How many times did Tulsi drop the phrase "regime change wars" (which has obviously never been our policy in Syria) in the debate the other night? I don't know if she was ordered to use that particular bit of Russian phraseology or if it just comes naturally to her at this point, but it's telling nonetheless. And then there's her frequent appearances on Fox News, where she goes after not individual candidates but the party as a whole. That's not something one does if they're serious about the nomination, so what else could her endgame be?

After all this time, her various antics have finally bought her some serious primary competition back in Hawaii, so she might assume there's not much incentive to not go third party.

a serious candidate talks to all sides

not just one side
 
How many times did Tulsi drop the phrase "regime change wars" (which has obviously never been our policy in Syria) in the debate the other night? I don't know if she was ordered to use that particular bit of Russian phraseology or if it just comes naturally to her at this point, but it's telling nonetheless. And then there's her frequent appearances on Fox News, where she goes after not individual candidates but the party as a whole. That's not something one does if they're serious about the nomination, so what else could her endgame be?

After all this time, her various antics have finally bought her some serious primary competition back in Hawaii, so she might assume there's not much incentive to not go third party.

mindless post
 
Well, I have not looked specifically recently, but Tulsi did receive support from what seemed like textbook cases of troll farm posters when I did. It doesn't necessarily mean she's in any collusion with them though, but some of her antics are strange too. I do like her nevertheless, and she have zero chances anyway, but there's certainly some interesting anomalies.
 
Well, I have not looked specifically recently, but Tulsi did receive support from what seemed like textbook cases of troll farm posters when I did. It doesn't necessarily mean she's in any collusion with them though, but some of her antics are strange too. I do like her nevertheless, and she have zero chances anyway, but there's certainly some interesting anomalies.

what antics?
 
Hey, If the US can interfere in other countries elections why shouldn't others interfere in US elections
 
Obama: "Tell Vlad I'll have more flexibility after the election." :D




Isn't that interfering in an election, prompting a foreign asset to dig up dirt on Romney. Quid Pro Quo, help me get rid of Romney and I'll get rid of those missiles for you.
 
whats with the meddling shit anyway?

twiiter ads?

fb ads?

really?

its BS
 
Back
Top