sr71plt
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2006
- Posts
- 51,872
Dictionaries can only retroactively describe language change which is already underway. Linguistically, the acceptability of language change is determined by usage, with dictionaries playing catch-up. That's one of the nice things about the linked article, how it demonstrates that certain style battles (could care less) have already been lost.
I specified what the U.S. publishing industry does--the one that will edit your work if you are published in the mainstream. Again, I think many writers cause themselves too much headache and throw too many cooks in the kitchen on this not just to accept what the industry is going to do with their work if they publish it.
Some writers want to spend too much of their time being high brow and wandering around in some literary forest about this. Why they can't simply take the simplification the industry gives them as a gift allowing them to concentrate more on their writing is beyond me.
Incidentally, although Webster's International/Collegiate comes out with numbered editions in long time delays, it actually updates with each new printing--every three or four months for the Collegiate, less often for the International.