Keystone -Make a decision

Dazzle1

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Posts
2,042
Well there is now another delay on Keystone

Even though it will not effect the environment (if we don't use it, the Chinese will) and pipelines crisscross the country, Obama can't
say yea or nay.

Its a shame that crackpots like 350.org are even being listened too

Once again Obama lets down working people for the so called beautiful people.
 
IrezumiKiss
This message is hidden because IrezumiKiss is on your ignore list.


behead yourself, NIGGER
 
Why do they need the pipelines? Why not build a refinery closer to the source?

There's plenty of railways.
 
Why do they need the pipelines? Why not build a refinery closer to the source?

There's plenty of railways.
As far as the Refinery , good question.

you do know the carbon foot print is larger for railways than a pipeline.
 
What do supermodels of Nordic heritage have to do with Keystone? :confused:

I don't know what you're talking about. We clearly need some examples of the aforementioned in this here thread.
 
As far as the Refinery , good question.

you do know the carbon foot print is larger for railways than a pipeline.

True for volume per mile transported. But a railway is multi purpose. I'd like to see you ship lumber and tourists via pipeline. :cool:
 
The Gutless Fraud won't make a decision until after the election.
 
The Gutless Fraud won't make a decision until after the election.
It really is a remarkable phenomenon. They are so afraid. They tell us their policies are so wonderful, yet they refuse to own them. Plus they cheat by protecting their candidates.
The message I take from all of this (pipeline, employer mandate) is that the actual implementation is going to be a disaster.
 
He has made a decision.


It is not going to be approved while he is President. He's made that perfectly clear.
 
Why do they need the pipelines? Why not build a refinery closer to the source?

There's plenty of railways.

As far as the Refinery , good question.

you do know the carbon foot print is larger for railways than a pipeline.

Didn't the rail road pipeline recently blow up a town in Canada?

Meanwhile, the Popcorn Caribou are thriving; the pipeline keeps them warm at night...

;) ;)

And once it's refined...

Does it just stay there? Or do they need to ship it somewhere?

Warren Buffet, as I pointed out a year or two ago, went heavy into rail, so he sure as hell doesn't want to see a pipeline...
 
I think it is more like

Party with JZ and Beyonce first, then legacy, then Party, but only when they get restless and he feels that the aforementioned might be in some small danger of a slight tarnish...



Country and Jobs do not even make the list, everyone he cares about is employed.

I always tell Malia and Sasha, look, you guys, I don't worry about you. I mean, I worry the way parents worry, but they’re on a path that is going to be successful, even if the country as a whole is not successful.”
President Barack Obama, November 2011
 
Canadian oil+Chinese demand+?= American jobs!

Canadian oil+Chinese demand+American grain+American Consumer+American refineries= American jobs!

However, the Chinese miracle was all smoke and mirrors and their economy is in a state of slow collapse; central planning has made few Great Leaps Forward, a pale shade of the newly adopted spirit of Capitalism (they can march now in the parade of heroes, but they are on a tight leash, the sort of leash some here in the states would love to 'employ').
 
Why do they need the pipelines? Why not build a refinery closer to the source?

There's plenty of railways.

As far as the Refinery , good question.

you do know the carbon foot print is larger for railways than a pipeline.

There are less EPA hurdles involved with building a pipeline than building a refinery. That's why there are no refineries in the Dakota's.

Ishmael
 
The pipeline won't effect the environment. It's scary there are people stupid enough to believe that.
 
The pipeline won't effect the environment. It's scary there are people stupid enough to believe that.

I don't think anyone is claiming that the pipeline, per se, is going to effect the environment, although some have raised the prospect of nasty spillage in case of a breach. The environmental argument is that building the pipeline would enable more exploitation of the tar sands, which is I arguably bad for the environment.
 
Kriss Kross will make ya.....

Well there is now another delay on Keystone

Even though it will not effect the environment (if we don't use it, the Chinese will) and pipelines crisscross the country, Obama can't
say yea or nay.

Its a shame that crackpots like 350.org are even being listened too

Once again Obama lets down working people for the so called beautiful people.

http://img2.timeinc.net/ew/i/2013/01/16/KRISS-KROSS_510x380.jpg
 
You're right. It's good for America and puts people to work. We can't have any of that.

Going forward would create so much momentum what with housing correcting, and other good economic news. I was really disappointed when I read he delayed...its such a cop-out. But from any of our leaders really.....
 
Back
Top