Brains_N_Boobs
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2006
- Posts
- 35,328
subtle, but good.
what about ben johson ? (NOT the writer)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sf5akO2ThE4
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
subtle, but good.
what about ben johson ? (NOT the writer)
Ha! Oh yeah, now I remember. It was a topical ointment for dermatitis *points at picture from somewhere* so as you can see so no illegal injection. I’ll have a word with the veterinarian who prescribed it, but it’s clearly all a big misunderstanding. We feel vindicated and have high hopes for the Preakness.
Doesn't matter. Zero tolerance is zero tolerance. Revoke the win...give a 5 year ban to Baffert. We all know it is a lie, but the message is the same
Has there ever been a race of any kind where someone wasn't cheating?
So if the race result is nullified, what happens to all the betting wagers that were "losers" after the day of the race? Do the punters get their money back?![]()
If the second test comes back dirty...
Odds are the owners will sue him. I doubt the owners knew anything.
I doubt there will much demand for this horse as a stud. Sure...he ran a good race dirty. Clean...the horse had no legs in the shortest race of the Crown. It shows the legs are weak. Watch the race...it was as if you could watch the horse get stiff around the final turn. They knew this ( the horse had weak legs) and that is why they cheated
Two year ban is better than nothing...but I still stand by my belief 5 was fair.
Whoa Nellie!!!!
NEW YORK (AP) — A New York federal judge on Wednesday nullified the suspension of horse trainer Bob Baffert, finding that the New York Racing Association acted unconstitutionally by failing to let him adequately respond to claims made against him after Kentucky Derby winner Medina Spirit failed a postrace drug test.
In her written ruling, Brooklyn Judge Carol Bagley Amon said a prompt post-suspension hearing where Baffert could refute the claims was required to meet constitutional muster.
But she said the racing association “had held no hearing — let alone a prompt one.”
https://apnews.com/853101b7c4980ffbdeecc653e1681a6b
Always bet on old money. Wow.