Kamala’s 2024 Presidential Run

I may have been influenced by the Dems throwing an eight year tantrum and saying shit like "Trump wears diapers." If they, including you, want maturity in political discourse, they could start with leading by example.
*Negative, Ghostrider, the pattern is full*
We tried that approach once, way back in 2016.

Remember? A well-intentioned Michelle Obama urged us
"When they go low, we go high".


America got Trump as a result.


As the philosopher imbecile George W. Bush once famously opined
"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice .... (Long pause)...
WE DON'T GET FOOLED AGAIN!"


Fuck cryptofascism, fuck toxic masculinity from aging boomers, fuck Trump, and if you voted for Trump, fuck you and I sincerely hope you run over your family dog in full view of all of your grandkids.
 
There's no guarantee that even a Democratic Congress would be able to stop him if he attempts to abuse executive orders and executive powers to impose martial-law or something like that. The best hope then would be that the Pentagon brass would refuse to follow such an order.

Which would be mutiny.

Good luck with advocating that.
 
Kami-la-la-la can’t even Tell you how she’d vote on prop 47, what makes us think she can make real decisions? She can’t think on her feet, that’s become glaringly obvious!
Let me see. If she voted for it, she angers one part of her voting bloc, and if she voted against it, she'd anger another. This is a broad-based coalition and it needs to be stay a united front until your guy is defeated at last. Besides, it's called a "secret ballot" for a reason. If she gets in office and starts enacting policies related to it, then it might be your business. Until then, it's not, so mind your own.
 
And they always do, but this is an exceptional case, the rise of the new Hitler and Hitler cannot be dealt with civilly and the Nazis that support him are un-American if not just downright criminal.

They have no rights. There is no place for them in civil society.

You can speak to/treat them uncivilly.

You should, in fact.

SAY IT LOUD!
and often
and often
and often


They are deplorable garbage and truth is civil discourse and if you cannot handle it, then you're a Fascist too!

Just like Hitler!

🙄

Um, J.D. Vance worried that DonOld would be “America’s Hitler” and maaaaany members of DonOld’s own cabinet / administration straight up say DonOld is a fascist.

But, sure, it’s the Democrats who are out of line…

😑

👉 JoeSodaPop 🤣

🇺🇸

Side note:

Anyone that votes for the rapey, misogynistic, corrupt orange traitor has self-identified as un-American garbage.

Hope that helps.

👍

🇺🇸
 
You destroy your cred with hypocrisy, hostility, belligerence, and generally everything in a thesaurus that says you're permanently mad at everyone who disagrees with you.

Minority dissent has a vital role in democracy, but it needs to be articulate. Tantrums of shouting, insulting, rioting, etc. won't get public support. The Dems will probably lose, and then they need to do something better than looting and burning again.

🙄

Um, the major looting and burning occurred under DonOld’s administration, and was related to DonOld telling cops to be rough on handcuffed individuals, which resulted in Derek Chauvin (a cop who supported DonOld) murdering George Floyd while he was handcuffed.

😑

Also:

The political affiliations of those who actually rioted and looted are largely unknown, but there are known examples of right wing groups / individuals inciting and participating in the rioting and looting.

Hope that ^ helps.

👍

👉 Sternsot 🤣

🇺🇸
 
You destroy your cred with hypocrisy, hostility, belligerence, and generally everything in a thesaurus that says you're permanently mad at everyone who disagrees with you.

Minority dissent has a vital role in democracy, but it needs to be articulate. Tantrums of shouting, insulting, rioting, etc. won't get public support. The Dems will probably lose, and then they need to do something better than looting and burning again.
Someone's triggered.

What a complete load of tripe.

You aren't and never were nonpartisan. You used it as a disguise. And not a good one.
 
A reminder of what's at stake.
https://i.imgur.com/sZDcy0L.png
I posted this yesterday. The actual AUTHOR of the book "The Handmaid's Tale", Margaret Atwood, was amused that an editorial cartoonist had used her characters to make a political cartoon and retweeted. She was immediately "man-splained" by some fundie dirtbag to tell her that the book was a metaphor for ISLAMIC fundamentalism, NOT Christian fundamentalism. Telling you what you REALLY meant is some Derpy-level garbage.
https://i.imgur.com/JCby7Gr.png
 
Trump deported fewer illegals than Obama. He never built the wall that Mexico was to pay for. He never repealed and replaced Obamacare. He didn't make America "great again." What makes you think he can do any of this time around as an elderly senile convicted felon and adjudicated rapist?
 
I posted this yesterday. The actual AUTHOR of the book "The Handmaid's Tale", Margaret Atwood, was amused that an editorial cartoonist had used her characters to make a political cartoon and retweeted. She was immediately "man-splained" by some fundie dirtbag to tell her that the book was a metaphor for ISLAMIC fundamentalism, NOT Christian fundamentalism. Telling you what you REALLY meant is some Derpy-level garbage.
https://i.imgur.com/JCby7Gr.png
They didn't realize that this was the actual author to whom he spoke? LMAO.
 
They didn't realize that this was the actual author to whom he spoke? LMAO.
This happens so often on Twitter it's almost a trope.
A climate change denialist suggested that a climate scientist read a certain book to find out what climate change was "really" about.
The scientist replied, I am the author of that book, please check it against my user name if you don't believe me, and you've totally mischaracterized my research.
Boom!
 
This happens so often on Twitter it's almost a trope.
A climate change denialist suggested that a climate scientist read a certain book to find out what climate change was "really" about.
The scientist replied, I am the author of that book, please check it against my user name if you don't believe me, and you've totally mischaracterized my research.
Boom!
Wow....pretty crazy.
 
Back
Top