Just shoot me now!

[JackLuis]

Oh shit, I agree with Michale Steel!

How could this happen you ask?

The Steel man gets yelled at for using the term "Honest Injun" while talking to Hannity.

WTF Native Americans are upset about his use of a common term that alludes to the honesty of Native Americans?

Oh if that's all they can come up with to flog Steel about, they haven't been listening to his "No's."

Get a life.

 

[Lisa Summers]

You'd think a black man would be a little more conscious of such things.

 

[Guest]

Oh shit, I agree with Michale Steel!

How could this happen you ask?

The Steel man gets yelled at for using the term "Honest Injun" while talking to Hannity.

WTF Native Americans are upset about his use of a common term that alludes to the honesty of Native Americans?

Oh if that's all they can come up with to flog Steel about, they haven't been listening to his "No's."

Get a life.

It speaks of a far greater issue that Steele isn't even aware of how offensive that term is, don't you think?

Maybe he'll get around to an apology when he finishes his book tour.

 

[Stella_Omega]

The rest of the RNC is not real happy with him;
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/08/steele-trapped-rnc-chair_n_416919.html

22% approval rating. Not real great.

 

[TE999]

Oh shit, I agree with Michale Steel!

How could this happen you ask?

The Steel man gets yelled at for using the term "Honest Injun" while talking to Hannity.

WTF Native Americans are upset about his use of a common term that alludes to the honesty of Native Americans?

Oh if that's all they can come up with to flog Steel about, they haven't been listening to his "No's."

Get a life.

It's not as much what was said, it's who said it. A Black Republican! Ewwww.

Who remembers Jesse Jackson's crack about NYC being 'Hymietown'. He got a pass on that one because he's on the politically correct side. Rev. Al, JJ Jr. and some others have made PC offensive remarks about other races and they got a pass too.

There was some bitching a while back about High School, College and Major League Baseball Native American mascot names too. Some changed, a lot didn't. We still have the Cleveland 'Indians' and the Atlanta 'Braves' last time I checked.

 

[Stella_Omega]

Except Steele is not getting a pass. And Jackson did not get a pass from the Anti-defamation league, either.

 

[Huckleman2000]

Who gave Jesse Jackson a pass on "Hymietown"?
Certainly, old white conservative crackers bring it up any chance they get.
Especially ones that aren't Jewish, and probably say "Hymietown" themselves. It's the racist ones that love, love, lurve when a minority person uses a racist term.

Wink on that, asshat.

 

[Stella_Omega]

It's the racist ones that love, love, lurve when a minority person uses a racist term.

yep-- because it proves that minorities are horrible people that don't deserve any respect.

 

[JackLuis]

Mr. Steel can not be a racist, well yes he could be but I don't think he is. He is the Chief Repugnican though and if we just point out the stupid Repugnican stuff he says that is important, maybe, just maybe the country will realize that he is a "Carmel colored" Shill for the party of NO!

I thought it funny when it looked like Obama was going to pick Hillary for his running mate, McCain picks Pailen, then after Obama is picked as the candidate the RNC goes black?

Then they put up Bobby Jindel as a fresh new rising star of the party. Notice the trend?

Now the Party of No! is complaining that they have let "those" people in.

But it gets better. The right wing comes up with the "Tea Party" and when it looks like a tax protest is underway and money starts to be collected in Millions, then the RNC tries to co-opt the Tea Party movement and horn in on the money, despite the fact that our economic problems are rooted in the budgets of the last eight years that passed with the very same people who are complaining about debt and losses that mean that we can't afford another war.

SO Native Americans whine about the words people use, but don't you dare raise an issue that means life or death to our Armed Forces, never complain that a war over Iraq oil is about oil.

Oh no it about "Freedom", "Hope" and all the other immeasurable catch phrases that politicians use to mask the reality that they are out for number one and the American people are just there to support the uber rich.

I'm going to figure out how to do a gerbil.

 

[Guest]

What?

 

[Stella_Omega]

yes, a person of color can be racially prejudiced even though they might also be affected by racism. Some black people are racially prejudiced against blacks, in fact. Who'da thunk!

SO Native Americans whine about the words people use, but don't you dare raise an issue that means life or death to our Armed Forces, never complain that a war over Iraq oil is about oil.

We dare to raise that issue all the time. Not a day goes by that someone here doesn't mention that the Oil war is about oil.

AND we can complain, at the very same time, about ignorant and prejudiced speech on the part of people who should know better.

at the very same time!

 

[TE999]

Who gave Jesse Jackson a pass on "Hymietown"?
Certainly, old white conservative crackers bring it up any chance they get.
Especially ones that aren't Jewish, and probably say "Hymietown" themselves. It's the racist ones that love, love, lurve when a minority person uses a racist term.

Wink on that, asshat.

My my...hit a nerve did we?

I suppose 'old white conservative crackers' isn't insulting in your world? What a brain-dead hypocrite you are. Of course everyone's a racist in your world that disagrees with you and your PC bullpucky.

Since you like these so much, here's a few more.

 

[Guest]

What is a bullpucky?

 

[Stella_Omega]

My my...hit a nerve did we?

I suppose 'old white conservative crackers' isn't insulting in your world? What a brain-dead hypocrite you are. Of course everyone's a racist in your world that disagrees with you and your PC bullpucky.

Since you like these so much, here's a few more.

yeah, TE99 got it right; everyone who thinks racist speech is okay-- is racist. That's a big part of the definition of "racist," the assumption that one person can be described by sweeping, all-inclusive descriptors. Only the powerful have the right to be individuals. the rest of us are our race or sex or whatever-- just one more example of the broad crowd.

Which is why old white conservatives who love to call names hate being generalised so very much-- don't call them "crackers," call them "old white conservatives." That's dismissive enough, and they can't call you a hypocrite for reacting to their insults in kind.

Of course they will anyway, because if they can't win on logic, or bully you into silence, they can always complain about your tone of voice.

 

[JackLuis]

So in theory I could call Steel a "Running dog for the Neo-Con conspiracy," but it would be wrong to call him "a Black running dog?"

Why do I care if he is black? or an oreo or an Uncle Tom? He is doing the devils work!

This is a man who apologizes to the Rush Limbaugh and agrees with him.

I'll bet he is good, down home at the evangelical picnics, although I understand they keep a close eye on him around the watermelons.

 

[Stella_Omega]

doublepost

 

[Stella_Omega]

So in theory I could call Steel a "Running dog for the Neo-Con conspiracy," but it would be wrong to call him "a Black running dog?"

Why do I care if he is black? or an oreo or an Uncle Tom? He is doing the devils work!

This is a man who apologizes to the Rush Limbaugh and agrees with him.

I'll bet he is good, down home at the evangelical picnics, although I understand they keep a close eye on him around the watermelons.

If he were white, would that be important enough to include in his description?

You wouldn't call someone else a "White Running Dog" would you? He'd be a running dog, pure and simple.

Although, since the neo-con cnospiracy is so incredibly racist by nature, the fact that a man on their leash is black-- is worth mentioning because of the context. Because you'd think the fool would know better. It's not like his colleagues even try to hide it.

 

[TE999]

What is a bullpucky?

It's a nice way of saying 'bullshit'.

 

[Guest]

It's a nice way of saying 'bullshit'.

Thank you -

 

[JackLuis]

If he were white, would that be important enough to include in his description?

You wouldn't call someone else a "White Running Dog" would you? He'd be a running dog, pure and simple.

Although, since the neo-con cnospiracy is so incredibly racist by nature, the fact that a man on their leash is black-- is worth mentioning because of the context. Because you'd think the fool would know better. It's not like his colleagues even try to hide it.

Thank you Stella for making a clear distinction between a White Racist running dog and a Black racist running dog. It is a fine line that you draw, as you should as a word smith.

So if we consider the context of the "normal" society, it is significant that the head of the RNC and the President are both black, well negro, I use this term to allow for the coffee colored gentlemen in question. White I find offensive, Caucasian if you want to be PC is the correct term.

So Michale Steel is the negro running dog of the Caucasian racist, money grubbing, overlords and Barrack Obama is a Black man with all their shit to clean up.

Not sure if the context of a man servant is appropriate, but it fits the stereotype of the Caucasian southern slave owner letting the Negros clean up the mess.

 

[TE999]

If he were white, would that be important enough to include in his description?

You wouldn't call someone else a "White Running Dog" would you? He'd be a running dog, pure and simple.

Although, since the neo-con conspiracy is so incredibly racist by nature, the fact that a man on their leash is black-- is worth mentioning because of the context. Because you'd think the fool would know better. It's not like his colleagues even try to hide it.

For someone who's always squawking about generalizing folks, that's a dandy.

A conspiracy? Ohhh yeahhh...that Vast Right Wing one Hillary warned us about.

In case you've forgotten, a lot of racism comes from Southern Democrats and a whole crowd of Yankee Democrats too...not to mention politicians who pander to minorities and oh so gently oppress them with government handouts instead of giving then a hand up.

Steele's on a leash is he? I guess hes a hanky head, do rag, house nigger, Uncle Tom too, huh? He's no fool, he just has conservative principles guiding him not bleeding heart poverty pimp hypocrisy.

 

[Boxlicker101]

yeah, TE99 got it right; everyone who thinks racist speech is okay-- is racist. That's a big part of the definition of "racist," the assumption that one person can be described by sweeping, all-inclusive descriptors. Only the powerful have the right to be individuals. the rest of us are our race or sex or whatever-- just one more example of the broad crowd.

Which is why old white conservatives who love to call names hate being generalised so very much-- don't call them "crackers," call them "old white conservatives." That's dismissive enough, and they can't call you a hypocrite for reacting to their insults in kind.

Of course they will anyway, because if they can't win on logic, or bully you into silence, they can always complain about your tone of voice.

Actually, it's just the opposite. Conservatives tend to think of people as individuals and Libs. think of therm as being members of a particular race, gender, etc. For example: Two of the biggest Liberal shibboleths are School Busing and Affirmative Action, which usually degenerates into quotas. Liberals say: "Take 100 students of one race from Area A and bus them every day to School B. Take 100 students from another race and bus them every day from Area B to School A." The only criteria used by Libs is race. Conservatives say: "Let the students attend the school that is the most convenient to them."

Liberals look at the racial makeup of an area and say: "X percent of the people in this area are members of Race A. Therefore, the hiring and promoting of all large employers in that area must be at least X percent." Conservatives say: "Hire and promote the most qualified.

Given time,k I could probably think of other ways in which Liberals think of people as being members of certain groups rather than individuals, and Conservatives think the opposite.

 

[Stella_Omega]

Actually, it's just the opposite. Conservatives tend to think of people as individuals and Libs. think of therm as being members of a particular race, gender, etc. For example: Two of the biggest Liberal shibboleths are School Busing and Affirmative Action, which usually degenerates into quotas. Liberals say: "Take 100 students of one race from Area A and bus them every day to School B. Take 100 students from another race and bus them every day from Area B to School A." The only criteria used by Libs is race. Conservatives say: "Let the students attend the school that is the most convenient to them."

and the schools conveneint to the conservatives are well-built and staffed, and the ghetto schools are falling apart and have minimal staff. The theory goes that putting the children of conservatives into a shit shcool will encourage the cons, who care about themselves at least, to try to improve that district because their children must go there.

Liberals look at the racial makeup of an area and say: "X percent of the people in this area are members of Race A. Therefore, the hiring and promoting of all large employers in that area must be at least X percent." Conservatives say: "Hire and promote the most qualified.

and of course, the "most Qualified" means whatever the con wants it to mean. And that means that very few people from that other race is qualified-- only white people are qualified. This is why the job quotas were put in place in the first place.

Remember?

Given time,k I could probably think of other ways in which Liberals think of people as being members of certain groups rather than individuals, and Conservatives think the opposite. : (

You mean, ways in which conservatives give lip service to the principle of individualism, as long as it doesn't inconvenience them too much.

If liberals have enforced racial quotas, it's because they, at least, acknowledge the damage that conservative lie has done to our minorities.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Actually, it's just the opposite. Conservatives tend to think of people as individuals and Libs. think of therm as being members of a particular race, gender, etc. For example: Two of the biggest Liberal shibboleths are School Busing and Affirmative Action, which usually degenerates into quotas. Liberals say: "Take 100 students of one race from Area A and bus them every day to School B. Take 100 students from another race and bus them every day from Area B to School A." The only criteria used by Libs is race. Conservatives say: "Let the students attend the school that is the most convenient to them."

Liberals look at the racial makeup of an area and say: "X percent of the people in this area are members of Race A. Therefore, the hiring and promoting of all large employers in that area must be at least X percent." Conservatives say: "Hire and promote the most qualified.

Given time,k I could probably think of other ways in which Liberals think of people as being members of certain groups rather than individuals, and Conservatives think the opposite.

and the schools conveneint to the conservatives are well-built and staffed, and the ghetto schools are falling apart and have minimal staff. The theory goes that putting the children of conservatives into a shit shcool will encourage the cons, who care about themselves at least, to try to improve that district because their children must go there. and of course, the "most Qualified" means whatever the con wants it to mean. And that means that very few people from that other race is qualified-- only white people are qualified. This is why the job quotas were put in place in the first place.

Remember?You mean, ways in which conservatives give lip service to the principle of individualism, as long as it doesn't inconvenience them too much.

If liberals have enforced racial quotas, it's because they, at least, acknowledge the damage that conservative lie has done to our minorities.

It's quite gratifying to see that you agree with what I said about Libs being obsessed by race and similar factors.

Speaking of doing damage to minorities, Welfare as a way of life, also a Lib. shibboleth, probably does more damage to a group of people than just about anything else.

 

[Stella_Omega]

It's quite gratifying to see that you agree with what I said about Libs being obsessed by race and similar factors.

Speaking of doing damage to minorities, Welfare as a way of life, also a Lib. shibboleth, probably does more damage to a group of people than just about anything else.

Welfare as a way of life, ooookay.