Just curious.......

VaticanAssassin

God Mod
Joined
Jul 21, 2011
Posts
12,391
Anyone still sticking with the whole “he sexually assaulted women” narrative?

Or have we all moved on to the he drank too much in high school/college and has a bad temperament?
 
Anyone still sticking with the whole “he sexually assaulted women” narrative?

Or have we all moved on to the he drank too much in high school/college and has a bad temperament?

the goal posts have left the building
 
Anyone still sticking with the whole “he sexually assaulted women” narrative?

Or have we all moved on to the he drank too much in high school/college and has a bad temperament?

After calling him a gang raper without evidence they expected him to place his lips on their asses, but instead as a man falsely accused he challenged them to a verbal duel. Lucky for them this isn't the 19th Century.;)
 
After calling him a gang raper without evidence they expected him to place his lips on their asses, but instead as a man falsely accused he challenged them to a verbal duel. Lucky for them this isn't the 19th Century.;)

Why do you lie so much?
 
I'm waiting for the bestiality/animal cruelty allegations. :)

I can see Feinstein and Katz huddled over their next defamation, but they better be careful. I saw the top defamation attorney last night on Fox saying Kavanaugh has viable legal options on the table likely to be successful, despite being a public figure.
 
Its just too bad he cried...lost a lot of credibility there...otherwise, its just more yankee bullshit as us Canadians say
 
I can see Feinstein and Katz huddled over their next defamation, but they better be careful. I saw the top defamation attorney last night on Fox saying Kavanaugh has viable legal options on the table likely to be successful, despite being a public figure.

Whether he decides to take action or not the fact remains that Kavanaugh has been weaponized and the democrats know it hence the desperation in their tactics.
 
Anyone still sticking with the whole “he sexually assaulted women” narrative?

Or have we all moved on to the he drank too much in high school/college and has a bad temperament?

You've admitted to sexually assaulting women in college so it's no wonder you look up to judge rapey.
 
Birds of a feather flock together. And VatAss has shown an inordinate amount on interest in the Kavanaugh situation.
 
The alleged assault needed investigation, the drinking and partying is normal teenage stuff, but a judge lying (or being evasive enough to constitute a lie) under oath is a big deal. It's serious enough when members of the public do it, but from a judge it should be a deal-breaker. Otherwise, what is the point in the oath existing at all?

He's too dumb for the job. If he's dumb enough to play into the enemy's hands by committing such a transparent and unnecessary crime, he's too dumb for the job.
 
The alleged assault needed investigation, the drinking and partying is normal teenage stuff, but a judge lying (or being evasive enough to constitute a lie) under oath is a big deal. It's serious enough when members of the public do it, but from a judge it should be a deal-breaker. Otherwise, what is the point in the oath existing at all?

He's too dumb for the job. If he's dumb enough to play into the enemy's hands by committing such a transparent and unnecessary crime, he's too dumb for the job.

yes ma'am. to be so rattled and easily manipulated along with lying under oath is not very justice like.
 
Last edited:
yes ma'am. too be so rattled and easily manipulated along with lying under oath is not very justice like.

If the trump was any kind of chess player, he would have wrung his hands, said it's a terrible shame that the man he chose because of his glowing CV had let everyone down, said that integrity was important to his government, then picked someone the left found just as unsavoury. Then the left would look petty and disruptive if they tried to block the second choice, and the right could claim the moral high ground.
 
The alleged assault needed investigation, the drinking and partying is normal teenage stuff, but a judge lying (or being evasive enough to constitute a lie) under oath is a big deal. It's serious enough when members of the public do it, but from a judge it should be a deal-breaker. Otherwise, what is the point in the oath existing at all?

He's too dumb for the job. If he's dumb enough to play into the enemy's hands by committing such a transparent and unnecessary crime, he's too dumb for the job.

If what you say is true, why aren't Democrats demanding his prosecution for perjury?
 
He struck me as an entitled douchebag, pretty much like his nominator. That of course does not prevent one’s sitting on the bench, or in the Oval Office.
 
If what you say is true, why aren't Democrats demanding his prosecution for perjury?

Because both sides are too busy being rabidly against anything to do with the opposition to behave rationally.

Perfectly reasonable Americans get incredibly silly as soon as politics is involved. All kneejerk reactions and no common sense.
 
If the trump was any kind of chess player, he would have wrung his hands, said it's a terrible shame that the man he chose because of his glowing CV had let everyone down, said that integrity was important to his government, then picked someone the left found just as unsavoury. Then the left would look petty and disruptive if they tried to block the second choice, and the right could claim the moral high ground.

People her have told me you are, not only beautiful, but a wise and fair woman as well. Hoping that is true I ask the following: Why would you support the destruction of a man's life without any supporting witnesses, evidence, or corroboration, of allegations from his high school years some 35 years ago?

Senator Susan Collins has just came out and said:"This FBI report on Kavanaugh, this 7th investigation, appears to have been very thorough." Senator McConnell has just stated that nothing in this report impugns the testimony Kavanaugh has provided the Senate.
 
Back
Top