Jurors to view hours of hard-core fetish pornography!

[Guest]

. . . .

 

[jomar]

I can't define it, but I know it when I see it.

I'd rather be a juror for different fetishes, myself.

 

[glynndah]

"literary, scientific or artistic value"

Literary: Compare and contrast the behavior of the Pizza boy in this film with the arrival of the suitor in The Glass Menagerie.

Scientific: Hypothesis: People can get off on just about anything.

Artistic: Note the clever use of lighting, intriguing camera angles and scintillating dialog.

 

[Elianna]

We make sheep jokes all the time to my friends in Scotland, but to be honest, I think it's gross. I think that sex has its own beauty because there is mental, physical and emotional engagement between two people. I don't see that with a sheep.

I know I've rebelled against my Christian upbringing, but I think I'll cling to that little rule; there's just something disgusting to me about bestiality. There are very few things that I find abhorrent, but that's one of them.

 

[rgraham666]

Perhaps we should present The Song of Solomon to the jury.

 

[Just-Legal]

We make sheep jokes all the time to my friends in Scotland, but to be honest, I think it's gross. I think that sex has its own beauty because there is mental, physical and emotional engagement between two people. I don't see that with a sheep.

I know I've rebelled against my Christian upbringing, but I think I'll cling to that little rule; there's just something disgusting to me about bestiality. There are very few things that I find abhorrent, but that's one of them.

Scots?

Its the Welsh you have to watch.

 

[Nirvanadragones]

But if jurors find that any of the four videos at issue in the case have any literary, scientific or artistic value. . .

I'd like to know how they will be measuring this. Literary, scientific or artistic value based on what?

 

[Guest]

. . . .

 

[3113]

You must have posted this about the same time I posted mine. The thing that gets to me is that this Trial is happening because Conservative Christians got President Bush to try and crack down on "smut."

That pisses me off.

 

[Elianna]

Scots?

Its the Welsh you have to watch.

*Grins*

 

[Guest]

. . . .

 

[Nirvanadragones]

That's the very core of this, isn't it?

Whose subjective standards will this be based upon?

And also, how will they validate/ justify their decision? Again, based on what?

 

[shereads]

Perhaps we should present The Song of Solomon to the jury.

The verse where King Solomon has sex with an attractive chicken and then defecates is not a favorite of mine.

When I saw the thread title, I thought, "Cool. It has to be more fun than being a juror in a gruesome murder trial." Then I read on and changed my mind. I think I'd rather look at autopsy photos again than sit through nine hours of bestiality and scat.

 

[shereads]

Jesus Christ on a piece of toast.

ebay!!

 

[3113]

When I saw the thread title, I thought, "Cool. It has to be more fun than being a juror in a gruesome murder trial." Then I read on and changed my mind. I think I'd rather look at autopsy photos again than sit through nine hours of bestiality and scat.

Just remember this next time you're thinking of skipping out on Jury Duty

 

[Nirvanadragones]

When I saw the thread title, I thought, "Cool. It has to be more fun than being a juror in a gruesome murder trial." Then I read on and changed my mind. I think I'd rather look at autopsy photos again than sit through nine hours of bestiality and scat.

For your sake, I hope that Lawrence and Stephanie will not be part of your Jury.

 

[Guest]

. . . .

 

[TheeGoatPig]

Scat is fetish and should be protected by law. It is disgusting to me, and I never want to see any more than I (unfortunately) already have. But that doesn't mean that people should be prosecuted for it.

Bestiality, on the other hand, should be illegal not because it is smut, but because it is mistreatment of animals.

 

[shereads]

Scat is fetish and should be protected by law. It is disgusting to me, and I never want to see any more than I (unfortunately) already have. But that doesn't mean that people should be prosecuted for it.

Bestiality, on the other hand, should be illegal not because it is smut, but because it is mistreatment of animals.

Agreed.

In either case, I'm grateful I don't have to view the evidence.

 

[Guest]

. . . .

 

[shereads]

I envision the prosecution and defense attorneys arguing over which videos to show in court.

Show the anal!

No, the girl on girl!

Show the busty beauties!

No, the hirsute lovers!

A veritable buffet of fetishes.

Slattern.

 

[Guest]

. . . .

 

[3113]

Bestiality, on the other hand, should be illegal not because it is smut, but because it is mistreatment of animals.

Which, if they'd brought this guy in on something like that I'd be all behind. But this is an obscenity charge, and it just pisses me off. I mean, it's not like anyone is being forced to watch these. People are viewing them, presumably, in private in their own homes.

I don't see why any jury or government should have the right to say this against the law. If actors come forward with charges of kidnapping and abuse, fine, charge the guy with that. If animal rights people come forward with cruelty to animal charges, fine, charge him with that. But charging him with proving people with nasty, naughty things that they want to watch?

 

[TE999]

This is ridiculous and a waste of taxpayers money. Try as you might, you cannot legislate morality; drive it underground for a while, but never eliminate it.

Crap eaters, piss drinkers and farm animal fornicators pay taxes and hold down jobs just like everyone else. Their bizarre sexual tastes are their own business.
What's next, 'cleaning up' tv, movies and the internet?

 

[JustaJerk]

Assuming a mixed gender jury, I'm wondering what the deliberations will be like after they've watched all that porn...

Or maybe I should post this over in "Story Ideas"?

Justa Jerk